998-TT test mule already on the road
#33
You might be correct. Remember about a year ago for a short time there was a lot of talk on the net about a new supercar to replace the Carrera GT? Then it died out as quickly as it started. Maybe this is it.
#34
The wheels on this car are not far enough back, or close enough to the rear of the car to be mid engine with that size of a wheelbase.
I dont think it's the GT1, but I wouldnt be mad if I were wrong.
I dont think it's the GT1, but I wouldnt be mad if I were wrong.
#36
Or, could be the elongated tail is throwing our perception off. If you put your hand over the tail, it sure looks like a larger gap than is on the 997TT. It just stood out to me because it looks to be about the same gap as on my Cayman. Just did a side by side comparison of a pic of a 997TT and this mule and there is much more space between where the intercooler intake decal ends and the rear wheel cutout begins. Just speculation, however.
Last edited by USCCayman; 11-25-2008 at 09:23 PM.
#37
nahh, a new mid-engined carrera GT successor test mule would look different, roofline etc. it´s the next 911TT no doubt, a bit longer, flatter, with a new extendable front-lip and a new rear-wing design. The 997TT-MK II is ready to hit the market which is a starting signal for the next 911TT. it was the same scenario with the 996TT and development of the 997TT years ago. but let´s see, we will have some more information soon, i am pretty sure.
Last edited by catchmyshadow; 11-26-2008 at 08:16 AM.
#38
In response to another post, I would gladly pay a premium to burn a higher octane "special & more environmentally friendly" fuel in a supercar of the future in order to keep performance cars around. Problem is, is that most "greenies" argue the fact that anytime you have to "burn" any kind of fuel you are creating CO2 or other greenhouse gases that are negatively impacting the environment.
As for the next-gen 911, am I the only one who thinks that having rear seats in the 911 series is about as usefull as a politician? There are so many good choices out there if you need 4 seats, why engineer them into this car?
I doubt this is a test mule for the GT1, although I would also love to be proven wrong... I doubt it will be the 950 hp mid-engined replacement to the CGT, but one could hope.
Last edited by Zeus; 11-26-2008 at 09:25 AM.
#40
Man...I hope you're right about that one.
In response to another post, I would gladly pay a premium to burn a higher octane "special & more environmentally friendly" fuel in a supercar of the future in order to keep performance cars around. Problem is, is that most "greenies" argue the fact that anytime you have to "burn" any kind of fuel you are creating CO2 or other greenhouse gases that are negatively impacting the environment.
As for the next-gen 911, am I the only one who thinks that having rear seats in the 911 series is about as usefull as a politician? There are so many good choices out there if you need 4 seats, why engineer them into this car?
I doubt this is a test mule for the GT1, although I would also love to be proven wrong... I doubt it will be the 950 hp mid-engined replacement to the CGT, but one could hope.
In response to another post, I would gladly pay a premium to burn a higher octane "special & more environmentally friendly" fuel in a supercar of the future in order to keep performance cars around. Problem is, is that most "greenies" argue the fact that anytime you have to "burn" any kind of fuel you are creating CO2 or other greenhouse gases that are negatively impacting the environment.
As for the next-gen 911, am I the only one who thinks that having rear seats in the 911 series is about as usefull as a politician? There are so many good choices out there if you need 4 seats, why engineer them into this car?
I doubt this is a test mule for the GT1, although I would also love to be proven wrong... I doubt it will be the 950 hp mid-engined replacement to the CGT, but one could hope.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post