Coil over linear spring rates
#3
I believe the 997 GT2 uses linear front, and progressive rear. Not sure about the 997 GT3, but the 996 GT3 did the the same combo also.
Last edited by bbywu; 01-19-2009 at 11:07 AM.
#5
Stock systems consist of a SINGLE spring that could be linear or progressive. In the case of the 996 GT3 for example, the front is linear, rear progressive. Progressive meaning of course the spring starts out with one rate and ends up with a second, stiffer, rate. I believe -- not confirmed -- that 997 uses progressive rear spring for all the different versions (Turbo, GT3, etc.).
As far as I know (I am only an amateur whose knowledge comes mostly from wikipedia , anyone please correct me as needed.), most if not all after-market coilovers for the Turbo are stacked springs setup: a linear main spring (a), and a linear second spring (b) called either tender or helper spring, one on top of the other.
A. If the second spring is fully compressed when loaded (with the weight of the car on the coilover), it is called a tender spring and this tender spring does NOT contribute to the overall spring rate. It's there, again AFAIK, to keep the main spring in place during full extension and reduce potential spring noise. The rate of the system equals that of the main spring a. Tender spring rate is very small.
B. If the second spring is not fully compressed when loaded, it is called the helper spring, I think , and the spring rate of the system is b(a/(a+b)) initially, until that second spring becomes fully compressed. Someone checks the math for me. LOL. Once the second spring b becomes fully compressed in a dynamic situation, the system then has spring rate of the main spring, a. You probably could guess already that this system behaves like a progressive single spring system. Helper spring rate is higher than tender's.
I know that Bilstein, KW Variant 3, JRZ, and the Moton all have stacked spring setup. I know that Bilstein system uses a tender spring -- it's fully compressed and does not contribute to the overall rate. I believe (not sure) that none of the after-market coilovers uses progressive spring for either of the 2 stacked springs.
As far as I know (I am only an amateur whose knowledge comes mostly from wikipedia , anyone please correct me as needed.), most if not all after-market coilovers for the Turbo are stacked springs setup: a linear main spring (a), and a linear second spring (b) called either tender or helper spring, one on top of the other.
A. If the second spring is fully compressed when loaded (with the weight of the car on the coilover), it is called a tender spring and this tender spring does NOT contribute to the overall spring rate. It's there, again AFAIK, to keep the main spring in place during full extension and reduce potential spring noise. The rate of the system equals that of the main spring a. Tender spring rate is very small.
B. If the second spring is not fully compressed when loaded, it is called the helper spring, I think , and the spring rate of the system is b(a/(a+b)) initially, until that second spring becomes fully compressed. Someone checks the math for me. LOL. Once the second spring b becomes fully compressed in a dynamic situation, the system then has spring rate of the main spring, a. You probably could guess already that this system behaves like a progressive single spring system. Helper spring rate is higher than tender's.
I know that Bilstein, KW Variant 3, JRZ, and the Moton all have stacked spring setup. I know that Bilstein system uses a tender spring -- it's fully compressed and does not contribute to the overall rate. I believe (not sure) that none of the after-market coilovers uses progressive spring for either of the 2 stacked springs.
Last edited by cannga; 01-19-2009 at 06:27 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ModBargains
997 Turbo Vendor Classifieds
1
10-13-2015 04:55 PM
ModBargains
997 Vendor Classifieds
1
10-13-2015 04:53 PM