997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Bears Transport

IPD or Agency Power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 12-31-2009, 01:29 PM
vividracing's Avatar
Former Vendor
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 17,437
Rep Power: 0
vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !
78mm plenum with a stock throttle body, correct?
 
  #17  
Old 12-31-2009, 01:51 PM
997FL's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 593
Rep Power: 149
997FL Is a GOD !997FL Is a GOD !997FL Is a GOD !997FL Is a GOD !997FL Is a GOD !997FL Is a GOD !997FL Is a GOD !997FL Is a GOD !997FL Is a GOD !997FL Is a GOD !997FL Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by vividracing
78mm plenum with a stock throttle body, correct?
That is correct for all of the photos above.


I will have 82MM Plenum with enlarged ( GT3 ) TB dyno shortly.
 
  #18  
Old 12-31-2009, 01:59 PM
FLT6SPD's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Livermore>Fremont, CA
Posts: 781
Rep Power: 203
FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !
The design of an intake air system is major factor in volumetric-efficiency of the engine. Any abrupt changes causes pressure drops resulting in less air entering the combustion chamber. The intake air path should always have smooth transitions nothing abrupt to cause turbulence, same principles hold true for the exhaust.

If your theory where true we would not need multi-angle valve jobs or specially designed intake plenums since those are past the throttle body.

A quick study on fluid dynamics might enlighten you a bit.


Originally Posted by vividracing
The engine works off pulses, so once it is behind the throttle body, does not matter if it is a T or a Y. Does not matter to me really, we have our design with proven results, and others have theirs.
 
  #19  
Old 12-31-2009, 02:13 PM
vividracing's Avatar
Former Vendor
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 17,437
Rep Power: 0
vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !vividracing Is a GOD !
Thanks for your input ISIS. Unlike a Supra, how the Porsche engine works at this component is different. If the Y or T was such a big factor, then the results on both our 996TT and 997TT plenum would not be where they are.

Rennsport - The plenum is 78mm but the throttlebody is not which is the restriction on that part, that is why we built ours to use a larger throttle body. Whatever the smallest diameter is at any point of the system is the restriction. I have dynoed the 78mm one as well here on our own dyno. I have seen your dyno sheets before, have you dynoed it independently yourself?

Best of luck to the OP and the others trying to make a point. I am out.
 
  #20  
Old 12-31-2009, 03:55 PM
Softronic's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 563
Rep Power: 101
Softronic Is a GOD !Softronic Is a GOD !Softronic Is a GOD !Softronic Is a GOD !Softronic Is a GOD !Softronic Is a GOD !Softronic Is a GOD !Softronic Is a GOD !Softronic Is a GOD !Softronic Is a GOD !Softronic Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by yllwturbo
Not trying to step on anyones toes but it's hard for me to believe that a T plenum will flow equally with the y plenum. We can use h2o for example and pore it down the T pipe then do the same with the Y pipe. The water would eventually be stopped when it hits the dead end of a T. As more water is being pored into the T it will eventually start moving again. IT'S COMMON SENSE . If the theory works why would porsche make a y pipe instead of a T pipe?? just look at your y pipe where it joins together before the throttle body. a T would be be easier to joint saving time n $$$.I think the Y shape would explain itself.
I would have posted this as PCA Technical however this site requires me to post under Softronic.

The Boxer engine operates in pulses from bank to bank in which is why Porsche has used what we are calling a T design. This pulsation creates a frequency or resonance and is why the NA engines use a Resonance flap also. This design has been used since the 1983 L jetronic Carrerra for the plenum. The resonance flap has been used in the NA cars since the 964 introduction. The Porsche designed intake also is made this way so that the pulses are absorbed in the intake rather than them being redirected upstream towards the TB in which would create turbulence. Porsche has had many years to make changes if they wanted to the design if they thought it would benefit it. The cost would not be the issue as the Cup cars use the same design .





Best ,
Scott Slauson
 

Last edited by Softronic; 12-31-2009 at 08:14 PM. Reason: Text
  #21  
Old 01-01-2010, 03:22 AM
997 GT3 RS/TT's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Warsaw
Posts: 1,041
Rep Power: 91
997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute
Guys, so what is the verdict?

bigger throttle with T pipe?
 
  #22  
Old 01-01-2010, 10:01 AM
WilliamP997's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 30
WilliamP997 has much to be proud ofWilliamP997 has much to be proud ofWilliamP997 has much to be proud ofWilliamP997 has much to be proud ofWilliamP997 has much to be proud ofWilliamP997 has much to be proud ofWilliamP997 has much to be proud ofWilliamP997 has much to be proud ofWilliamP997 has much to be proud ofWilliamP997 has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by vividracing
Sure thing, you can also view the link here - http://www.vividracing.com/catalog/a...9-p-79632.html

Since the engine works off pulses, once through the throttle body, it really does not matter if it is a Y or a T shape. Everything leading up to your throttle body and the diameter of the throttle body itself is your restriction.

What makes you think that adding a slightly larger throttle body will make 45 more HP and 60 more TQ? Its not possible. What could be possible is that your dyno testing is SKEWED and you can make your product measure whatever gains you want. Porsche engineers must be Friggin STUPID leaving this power on the table !!!! A few more millimeters with a simple throttle body upgrade that could add an extra 60 TQ. Also, why no power gains on top?

I have owned and modified a few Porsches and I have a new 2010 turbo on the way. I don't post often but I read the forums regularly. I have modified my cars with companies that offer real results and not BS hype like this. I just can’t fathom how people reading this can believe that this mod can add 45 hp and 60 tq. From what I can ascertain from other mods like this, 15 more HP and TQ is realistic. Also, if you are going to advertise the best gains for your upgrade, why not point out that at 4380 RPMS on your graph the HP and TQ gains are a staggering increase of 70 HP and 80 TQ <O</O
 
  #23  
Old 01-01-2010, 11:12 AM
cannga's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Palos Verdes
Posts: 3,116
Rep Power: 254
cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !
Hi 993rscs, nice peaceful first post on the forum! Just kidding.
If I were you I would NOT do anything at the moment. I assume by the "whole works," you are doing extensive modification to the ECU/turbo? If so it's best to stay with one tuner company and follow the package offered by that one company alone (each tuner offers different packages -- the "stages"-- depending on how much power you want). This is important because the software is tuned according to the hardware; you don't necessarily want to mix a software with a hardware that it was NOT designed with, wrong header for example.

So first, do some research and pick out the tuner that you are comfortable with. Some of the more established ones, and the ones I would choose from, are, in alphabetical orders , EVOMS, GIAC/AWE Tuning, Protomotive, and Switzer. They are all sponsors here (except maybe Protomotive?) and could be contacted easily. Once you have chosen a package from a tuner, call him and ask for guideline as to what to to. Do not just get a plenum now.
The plenum is a "controversial" upgrade, and I would bet if you were to ask 10 good Porsche vendors, 9.5 would tell you it is NOT necessarily the first step towards more power. A stage 2 -- exhaust and ECU upgrade -- is. (And remember to fire the 0.5 vendor who tells you to start with the plenum.) Plenum, throttle body, header, etc., are usually saved for later stages, they have trade-offs (loss of power down low as mentioned here with too large throttle body, and same risk with header), and not the first upgrade that comes to mind in a stock car.

For the record, anyone please correct me if I am wrong, but there has not been an independent dyno (i.e. one NOT done by vendor, with proper before and after runs) that shows a reliable increase in horse power with plenum, let alone 45 hp. Happy New Year. Hope this helps & good luck and have fun!

Originally Posted by 993rscs
Hello everyone, I'm new to the forum, but I've been searching around here for quite a while. Anyways, I have a question hopefully some of you guys can answer.

I have a 2007 Porsche Turbo and I want to do a plenum/tb upgrade. I'm going to be doing larger turbos, intercoolers, the whole works in a couple of months as well. As for the plenum/tb, I've heard great things about the Agency Power setup as well as the IPD. IPD claims around 28+ hp and 30+ torque on a stock turbo, and agency power is claming 46+ hp and 60+ torque on a turbo with turbos, intercoolers, flash tune, etc.

If anyone can give me any input to help me with my decision I would appreciate it. Thank you!
 

Last edited by cannga; 01-01-2010 at 02:32 PM.
  #24  
Old 01-01-2010, 04:17 PM
FLT6SPD's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Livermore>Fremont, CA
Posts: 781
Rep Power: 203
FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !FLT6SPD Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by vividracing
Thanks for your input ISIS. Unlike a Supra, how the Porsche engine works at this component is different. If the Y or T was such a big factor, then the results on both our 996TT and 997TT plenum would not be where they are.

Best of luck to the OP and the others trying to make a point. I am out.

The only point I am trying to make is that you cannot change the basic laws of physics, or at this level common sense. You say it does not matter if it is a Y or a T. An abrupt 90 tee will not flow as smooth as a Y. Below is a picture of a velocity profile for a typical tee albeit it is only showing flow to one side but you see what is happening.

The blue area is lower velocity and the red is higher.



Can you explain to me why basic laws of physics do not apply to your part?
 

Last edited by FLT6SPD; 01-01-2010 at 05:41 PM. Reason: spelling
  #25  
Old 01-02-2010, 04:45 AM
997 GT3 RS/TT's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Warsaw
Posts: 1,041
Rep Power: 91
997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute997 GT3 RS/TT has a reputation beyond repute
Guys, Y plenum will produce less back pressure, that's the only difference.
Think about cooler end tanks, you may have cooler with nice shape end tank or not, both are working somehow.
My free lancer tuner test ipd for Korean friend, didn't find any difference, later he used gt2 intake.
but I think kit like this will add some power on highly modified car and no diferenc would be if it's Y or T.
I'm only not sure if 2mm difference (cayenne versus TT) is big enough?
What do you think?
 
  #26  
Old 01-02-2010, 06:24 AM
911TurboS2's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 41
911TurboS2 has a spectacular aura about911TurboS2 has a spectacular aura about911TurboS2 has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by cannga
Hi 993rscs, nice peaceful first post on the forum! Just kidding.
If I were you I would NOT do anything at the moment. I assume by the "whole works," you are doing extensive modification to the ECU/turbo? If so it's best to stay with one tuner company and follow the package offered by that one company alone (each tuner offers different packages -- the "stages"-- depending on how much power you want). This is important because the software is tuned according to the hardware; you don't necessarily want to mix a software with a hardware that it was NOT designed with, wrong header for example.

So first, do some research and pick out the tuner that you are comfortable with. Some of the more established ones, and the ones I would choose from, are, in alphabetical orders , EVOMS, GIAC/AWE Tuning, Protomotive, and Switzer. They are all sponsors here (except maybe Protomotive?) and could be contacted easily. Once you have chosen a package from a tuner, call him and ask for guideline as to what to to. Do not just get a plenum now.
The plenum is a "controversial" upgrade, and I would bet if you were to ask 10 good Porsche vendors, 9.5 would tell you it is NOT necessarily the first step towards more power. A stage 2 -- exhaust and ECU upgrade -- is. (And remember to fire the 0.5 vendor who tells you to start with the plenum.) Plenum, throttle body, header, etc., are usually saved for later stages, they have trade-offs (loss of power down low as mentioned here with too large throttle body, and same risk with header), and not the first upgrade that comes to mind in a stock car.

For the record, anyone please correct me if I am wrong, but there has not been an independent dyno (i.e. one NOT done by vendor, with proper before and after runs) that shows a reliable increase in horse power with plenum, let alone 45 hp. Happy New Year. Hope this helps & good luck and have fun!
FWIW, I agree with cannga. Go with a single tuner, and don't make upgrades in a piecemeal manner. I would add AWE to the list, as well as some of the Euro tuners. I would use Switzer Performance Innovation, but I am biased.
 
  #27  
Old 01-17-2010, 09:14 AM
HN-GT2997's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 17
HN-GT2997 is infamous around these parts
will this fit for the 997GT2?

greetings
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drinaldis
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
5
09-28-2015 01:37 PM
Superaudiofreak
Panamera
12
09-04-2015 03:22 PM
vividracing
Ferrari
0
08-24-2015 04:35 PM
VGLNTE1
996 Turbo / GT2
9
08-20-2015 08:14 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: IPD or Agency Power



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:44 AM.