why does the GT-R continue beating the 911 Turbo around the track?
#16
There is indeed ALWAYS a faster car unless you want to spend big $$ and change cars every year LOL
Get something that YOU like to drive.
Get something that YOU like to drive.
#17
In short, the Japanese for years were governed be the Jap Auto Board to produce cars at a certain HP. Under 300 I believe. In order to compete w/ the Europeans and Americans they had to go other routes to get performance out of their cars.
They worked real hard on braking and suspension systems in order to compete. You can YOUTUBE a set of 9 or 10 shows from a Japanese TV program from 2003 that talks about this in detail at the end of it.
I believe it is called “ Still the King “ or something like that? Use Search here and find the thread that is in the 996TT / GT2 forum for it. They have a GT-R prototype race a 996TT at the end of 1 of the show, the 996 wins but only because at that time the GT-R was way under on HP.
I’m a Porsche guy! But I also know there are other cars that in 1 way or another will out perform the Porsche. I just don’t care.
They worked real hard on braking and suspension systems in order to compete. You can YOUTUBE a set of 9 or 10 shows from a Japanese TV program from 2003 that talks about this in detail at the end of it.
I believe it is called “ Still the King “ or something like that? Use Search here and find the thread that is in the 996TT / GT2 forum for it. They have a GT-R prototype race a 996TT at the end of 1 of the show, the 996 wins but only because at that time the GT-R was way under on HP.
I’m a Porsche guy! But I also know there are other cars that in 1 way or another will out perform the Porsche. I just don’t care.
http://www.caranddriver.com/news/car..._pact-car_news
#18
I think a lot depends on the specific car , the track and the race itself . There seems to be a bit of confusion regarding whether the cars that broke the track records are the same spec as the stock cars on stock tires. Nissan still deserves a lot credit and I have long been a fan of Nissan cars . I owned the 300zxtt back the days .. great car.
Nissan's GTR never failed by virtue of its car . They failed (IMO) because the customer service left a few owners standing next to a Sentra in service hearing an advisor tell him his warranty is toast. Add to that the ridiculous waivers and requirements of how and where an owner must drive his own car or how he can customize it.
I had always felt even years ago had Nissan abandoned the mediocre 350Z and G37 (infiniti) and placed the Gtr with a little more refinement , a lot more customer service, and a little less tuner denial .. I would have bought one.
Nissan's GTR never failed by virtue of its car . They failed (IMO) because the customer service left a few owners standing next to a Sentra in service hearing an advisor tell him his warranty is toast. Add to that the ridiculous waivers and requirements of how and where an owner must drive his own car or how he can customize it.
I had always felt even years ago had Nissan abandoned the mediocre 350Z and G37 (infiniti) and placed the Gtr with a little more refinement , a lot more customer service, and a little less tuner denial .. I would have bought one.
#19
I think a lot depends on the specific car , the track and the race itself . There seems to be a bit of confusion regarding whether the cars that broke the track records are the same spec as the stock cars on stock tires. Nissan still deserves a lot credit and I have long been a fan of Nissan cars . I owned the 300zxtt back the days .. great car.
Nissan's GTR never failed by virtue of its car . They failed (IMO) because the customer service left a few owners standing next to a Sentra in service hearing an advisor tell him his warranty is toast. Add to that the ridiculous waivers and requirements of how and where an owner must drive his own car or how he can customize it.
I had always felt even years ago had Nissan abandoned the mediocre 350Z and G37 (infiniti) and placed the Gtr with a little more refinement , a lot more customer service, and a little less tuner denial .. I would have bought one.
Nissan's GTR never failed by virtue of its car . They failed (IMO) because the customer service left a few owners standing next to a Sentra in service hearing an advisor tell him his warranty is toast. Add to that the ridiculous waivers and requirements of how and where an owner must drive his own car or how he can customize it.
I had always felt even years ago had Nissan abandoned the mediocre 350Z and G37 (infiniti) and placed the Gtr with a little more refinement , a lot more customer service, and a little less tuner denial .. I would have bought one.
I've stated numerous times over in the GT-R forum of this board.
You get assigned a tech and a service rep. Only 2 people can sell you the car - the dealer principal or GM. Only three people can sit in the car (and they must all have been to the short training), the GM (or dealer principal), the service rep, and the master tech. We all get head of the line privileges, loaners for everything (and you must get a Maxima or equivalent - or better).
And the tuner denial? At least two of the documented 14 transmissions (that I'm aware of - not that there isn't more, it's just that I'm not aware of them) of the 3000+ GT-R's that most have referenced, had Cobb tunes and were still honored under warranty.
In fact, I saw 14 threads over a period of 4 months about the same transmission by somebody who was launching the car - cold, everytime he pulled out of his driveway, traffic signal, parking lot, etc... and he wondered why it broke (he ended up getting another GT-R).
This topic is old now, I believe.
Both the GT-R and the 911T are wonderful cars, that offer different experiences. At this level of performance, it comes down to preference.
#20
It sounds like you're already sold on buying the Porsche, but why does half a second bother you so much. Nobody ever said that that world's fastest production car is a 997TT. It's probably my favorite car for the money.
John
John
#21
They failed (IMO) because the customer service left a few owners standing next to a Sentra in service hearing an advisor tell him his warranty is toast. Add to that the ridiculous waivers and requirements of how and where an owner must drive his own car or how he can customize it.
#22
So what you're saying is - there are many people who don't understand how to read?
#23
Ill keep my Dry Sumped GT3 for the track.. Lets see how long these tracked GTR motors last..
#24
#25
#26
So now there is something wrong with the engine?
I don't get it...
I don't get it...
#27
[quote=jaspergtr;2725034]
And the tuner denial? At least two of the documented 14 transmissions (that I'm aware of - not that there isn't more, it's just that I'm not aware of them) of the 3000+ GT-R's that most have referenced, had Cobb tunes and were still honored under warranty.
In fact, I saw 14 threads over a period of 4 months about the same transmission by somebody who was launching the car - cold, everytime he pulled out of his driveway, traffic signal, parking lot, etc... and he wondered why it broke (he ended up getting another GT-R).
This topic is old now, I believe.
quote]
I don't think it's "old" because these threads and topics seem to re appear. .
Either way -these guys have their story too. http://www.autospies.com/news/Fair-O...ipstick-48063/
But the question still lingers whether the cars breaking all those records are the same as the stock Gtrs.
Did you sign a waiver not to customize or modify your Gtr ?
What do you think of this ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y27VM...layer_embedded
And the tuner denial? At least two of the documented 14 transmissions (that I'm aware of - not that there isn't more, it's just that I'm not aware of them) of the 3000+ GT-R's that most have referenced, had Cobb tunes and were still honored under warranty.
In fact, I saw 14 threads over a period of 4 months about the same transmission by somebody who was launching the car - cold, everytime he pulled out of his driveway, traffic signal, parking lot, etc... and he wondered why it broke (he ended up getting another GT-R).
This topic is old now, I believe.
quote]
I don't think it's "old" because these threads and topics seem to re appear. .
Either way -these guys have their story too. http://www.autospies.com/news/Fair-O...ipstick-48063/
But the question still lingers whether the cars breaking all those records are the same as the stock Gtrs.
Did you sign a waiver not to customize or modify your Gtr ?
What do you think of this ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y27VM...layer_embedded
Last edited by yrralis1; 02-12-2010 at 06:31 PM.
#28
^ My point was the multiple threads that everybody seems to reference revolve around the same few incidents.
I just saw a thread about the transmission that blew up on Samurai Speed's GT-R, as if it was still news.
That's why they keep reappearing... It isn't always new transmissions, but the same ones, rehashed.
And why does the same topic keep on getting brought up again - in EVERY GT-R thread?
How do track times equate to - LC 1.0?
I just saw a thread about the transmission that blew up on Samurai Speed's GT-R, as if it was still news.
That's why they keep reappearing... It isn't always new transmissions, but the same ones, rehashed.
And why does the same topic keep on getting brought up again - in EVERY GT-R thread?
How do track times equate to - LC 1.0?
#29
So what you interpreted my statement as is " there is something wrong with the engine ?? "
It seems you want to hear what you want to hear..
I almost bought that car, 1 day i will OWN THAT CAR.. I still want to see how long the motors last under serious track abuse before i decide what i will pay for that car.. If you need some clarity on the statement let me know..
Mike
It seems you want to hear what you want to hear..
I almost bought that car, 1 day i will OWN THAT CAR.. I still want to see how long the motors last under serious track abuse before i decide what i will pay for that car.. If you need some clarity on the statement let me know..
Mike
#30
^ My point was the multiple threads that everybody seems to reference revolve around the same few incidents.
I just saw a thread about the transmission that blew up on Samurai Speed's GT-R, as if it was still news.
That's why they keep reappearing... It isn't always new transmissions, but the same ones, rehashed.
And why does the same topic keep on getting brought up again - in EVERY GT-R thread?
How do track times equate to - LC 1.0?
I just saw a thread about the transmission that blew up on Samurai Speed's GT-R, as if it was still news.
That's why they keep reappearing... It isn't always new transmissions, but the same ones, rehashed.
And why does the same topic keep on getting brought up again - in EVERY GT-R thread?
How do track times equate to - LC 1.0?