TPC Racing Blitzkrieg Hybrid Intercoolers: The Most Advanced IC on the Market Today
#32
02-26-2010 | 11:37 AM
There are many interesting comments and opinions in this thread. we have another shipment of ICs coming through. going to put a video together when they arrive further explaining the tech. Sorry about the posting delay but our cores are to arrive any day.
Casey
Casey
#33
03-01-2010 | 10:11 AM
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 74
From: Germany
Rep Power: 17
I did my final test check my info how good the TPC IC´s are https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ll-others.html
#37
03-01-2010 | 07:16 PM
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 510
From: Woodbridge Virginia
Rep Power: 59
#38
03-01-2010 | 08:18 PM
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,214
From: Colorado
Rep Power: 396
yes, but he denies being such as of the last exchange I had with him last year in a heated IC thread, no pun intended.
#43
03-13-2010 | 05:03 AM
The best way to test ics is to datalog one car with stock and then with aftermarket ics.
Possibly do it on a stock car or very mildy tuned so there will not be a disadvantage running 700rwhp on stock ics. Log rpm intake temp outside temp and boost sensor of pressure. Do a standing 0 to 150 let's say. Then compare the data.
The dyno will not show all the benefits as it does not sumulate real world street pulls.
Possibly do it on a stock car or very mildy tuned so there will not be a disadvantage running 700rwhp on stock ics. Log rpm intake temp outside temp and boost sensor of pressure. Do a standing 0 to 150 let's say. Then compare the data.
The dyno will not show all the benefits as it does not sumulate real world street pulls.
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#44
03-13-2010 | 08:47 AM
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,116
From: Palos Verdes
Rep Power: 254
The best way to test ics is to datalog one car with stock and then with aftermarket ics.
Possibly do it on a stock car or very mildy tuned so there will not be a disadvantage running 700rwhp on stock ics. Log rpm intake temp outside temp and boost sensor of pressure. Do a standing 0 to 150 let's say. Then compare the data.
The dyno will not show all the benefits as it does not sumulate real world street pulls.
Possibly do it on a stock car or very mildy tuned so there will not be a disadvantage running 700rwhp on stock ics. Log rpm intake temp outside temp and boost sensor of pressure. Do a standing 0 to 150 let's say. Then compare the data.
The dyno will not show all the benefits as it does not sumulate real world street pulls.
Or are there other reasons that make a real street run more "data worthy" than a dyno? TIA
#45
03-13-2010 | 10:48 AM
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 277
From: Clarkesville, Georgia
Rep Power: 30
it's actually a great idea, because from my knowledge the bar and plate dissipates heat quicker than the tube and fin, but from my experience once the bar and plate is heat soaked it can't cool down without a shut down like my tube and fin could recover eventually. This was my drag strip experience with a fellow subi owner when his bar and plate got hot..it stayed hot, but took a while to get there. So having both worlds, and the bar and plate exterior, it's a grand plan.