100-200 km/h times: Stock_vs_Modified
#16
bob
#17
#19
Thanks Mert...weird enough the car had different times from run to run...the best was 5,5 while the worst was over 6,5...i will try better fuel during the weekend and report back...
#20
Dimitrios, I am sure you are on the right path.
Waiting forward for your good results.
If you can raise the octane, you may get 5.5 all time, I guess the knock sensors may come on and retard timing and that may be the cause why you get 6.5 s after subsequent trials.
This weekend, I will test with 109 octane, just imported 109 octane gas and want to see the results.
Regards,
Mert
#23
Many useful data can be obtained from the above table...I see that when VTGs are replaced with bigger turbos,car goes faster from 200-300 but there is no significant gain in 100-200...I am trying to find a dyno that can measure tip cars...so to see where i am...any ideas...?
#24
Many useful data can be obtained from the above table...I see that when VTGs are replaced with bigger turbos,car goes faster from 200-300 but there is no significant gain in 100-200...I am trying to find a dyno that can measure tip cars...so to see where i am...any ideas...?
#26
I'm not saying its not real but the fact that you're the only one doing this times makes me a bit sceptical.
I had my car with only exhaust and ECU so i know the difference when adding the modded VTGs. There is not a GREAT difference under 200km/h, but sure there is some difference.
I9 would love to see some others posting 100-200 times with same setup
Anyway you own a very fast car, congrads and enjoy it.
#27
Are you sure that those times are real?
AWE 700 0-100 4,5sec??????????????????????
9FF TRC-78 0-100 4,8sec?????????????????????
Even a stock car can do better than this, even with 2 fat passengers curying the day shopping home would be faster.
The only logical answer i can give to those times is that the cars were driven on wet or snow on summer old tyres!
AWE 700 0-100 4,5sec??????????????????????
9FF TRC-78 0-100 4,8sec?????????????????????
Even a stock car can do better than this, even with 2 fat passengers curying the day shopping home would be faster.
The only logical answer i can give to those times is that the cars were driven on wet or snow on summer old tyres!
#28
Today i bought a new sd card (i lost it) so to save my runs...oh...today i also installed Remus exhaust...So i have APR flash,Fabspped intake and Remus exhaust...Car is a tip and i made an 60-130miles run that was sent to Scott for verification...from that data,100-200km is obtained...Have a look and try to find a faster 997TT tip with stock turbos and pump fuel...
P.S. slope is 1,7% so its within limit of 3% for verification...
P.S. slope is 1,7% so its within limit of 3% for verification...
Skandalis
We are on of the biggest APR dealers in North America and the only APR dealer on 6speed. I would love to have any information you have on this software as we have several turbos locally that I would like to test as well from 100k - 200k.
We are having a track day next week and will try to test it then even though its on a road course we have some pretty good straights that we might be able to take advantage of.
my contact info is below.
#29
Are you sure that those times are real?
AWE 700 0-100 4,5sec??????????????????????
9FF TRC-78 0-100 4,8sec?????????????????????
Even a stock car can do better than this, even with 2 fat passengers curying the day shopping home would be faster.
The only logical answer i can give to those times is that the cars were driven on wet or snow on summer old tyres!
AWE 700 0-100 4,5sec??????????????????????
9FF TRC-78 0-100 4,8sec?????????????????????
Even a stock car can do better than this, even with 2 fat passengers curying the day shopping home would be faster.
The only logical answer i can give to those times is that the cars were driven on wet or snow on summer old tyres!