997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.

Is the 997.2 PDK only faster because of PDK?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-20-2010 | 01:22 PM
kip's Avatar
kip
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,330
From: Northern Europe
Rep Power: 76
kip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to behold
Is the 997.2 PDK only faster because of PDK?

It came to me as a surprise when Road and Track tested the new 6 speed 997.2 TT and the acceleration times are almost identical with the 997.1 6 speed times:

2010
http://www.roadandtrack.com/content/..._COVsprcar.pdf

2008
http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/co...sche-911-turbo

Chevrolet Corvette/Nissan GT-R 2010/2008/Porsche 911 Turbo 2010/2008 (May 2008 issue)

The results:

0*–120 mph 9.9 11.5 12.7 11.4 11.5
0*–110 mph 8.5 9.6 10.5 9.8 9.9
0*–100 mph 7.3 8.0 8.6 7.9 7.9
0*–90 mph 6.1 6.6 7.0 6.7 6.8
0*–80 mph 5.2 5.3 5.7 5.7 5.6
0*–70 mph 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.2 4.2
0*–60 mph 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.4
0*–50 mph 2.9 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.7
0*–40 mph 2.3 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.5
0*–30 mph 1.7 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.0
0*–20 mph 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6
0*–10 mph 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2

However on multiple comparisons, the PDK 977.2 TT RULES!

One example:

http://www.autobild.de/artikel/merce...i_1168909.html

http://www.autobild.de/artikel/2-2-s...ch_921964.html

The results:
<table class="t2 fachlex space-3col " height="310" width="479"><thead><tr><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">R8 vs SLS vs 997TT PDK vs 997TT Tiptronic
</th><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</th><th rowspan="1" colspan="1"></th> <th rowspan="1" colspan="1"></th> </tr></thead><tbody><tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="4" class="fett"><table class="t2 fachlex space-3col "><thead><tr><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</th> <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</th> <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</th> <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</th> </tr></thead><tbody><tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="4" class="fett">Beschleunigung</td> </tr><tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0–50 km/h</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,5 s</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,9 s</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,5 s 1,3 s
</td> </tr><tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0–100 km/h</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,9 s</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,9 s</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,3 s 3,5 s
</td> </tr><tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0–200 km/h</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">12,0 s</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11,1 s</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11,1 s 12,0 s
</td> </tr><tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="4" class="fett">Zwischenspurt</td> </tr><tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">60–100 km/h</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,0 s</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,7 s</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,0 s 2,0 s
</td> </tr><tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">80–120 km/h</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,9 s</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,8 s</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,3 s 2,2 s
</td></tr></tbody></table></td> </tr><tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> </tr><tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> </tr><tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> </tr><tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="4" class="fett">
</td> </tr><tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> </tr><tr> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td> <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
</td></tr></tbody></table>Is it possible the PDK and its launch control are the major difference in acceleration results compared with the old 997.1 TT, because with the same gearbox there doesnt seem to be a difference with the 3.6 and 3.8 engines.

What do you think?
 
  #2  
Old 05-20-2010 | 03:18 PM
MBailey's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,957
From: Texas
Rep Power: 455
MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !
Those that have dynoed 997.2 PDK say they have ~ 480 whp (EVOMS Mustang) which is 40 or so more than 997.1 6sp. I dont know about the .2 6sp (actually didnt know you could still get a 6sp but I have not paid close attention)...
 

Last edited by MBailey; 05-20-2010 at 03:21 PM.
  #3  
Old 05-20-2010 | 03:32 PM
skandalis447's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,671
From: Athens
Rep Power: 133
skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !
I read somewhere that 997,1 is faster than 997,2 from 200-300...Can somebody recall that?
 
  #4  
Old 05-20-2010 | 04:12 PM
mhh's Avatar
mhh
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 229
From: Australia
Rep Power: 29
mhh is infamous around these partsmhh is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by skandalis447
I read somewhere that 997,1 is faster than 997,2 from 200-300...Can somebody recall that?
I recall it being said but it makes no sense that a car with less power and a lesser gearbox can sudden turn an acceleration deficit around above a certain speed.
 
  #5  
Old 05-20-2010 | 04:55 PM
bbywu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,778
From: OR Room 5
Rep Power: 1006
bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !
There has not been a head to head comparison between the 997TT and the DFI/PDK 997TT. The information being discussed here is based on two separate runs from SportAuto, tested on two different days.

According to SportAuto, the DFI 997 Turbo takes 31.1 seconds to travel from 200-300 km/h - September 2009 SportAuto

The 997 Turbo took 28.8 seconds for the same velocity range.
 

Last edited by bbywu; 05-21-2010 at 10:50 AM. Reason: cited source
  #6  
Old 05-21-2010 | 07:49 AM
speed21's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,634
Rep Power: 247
speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !
Seems unlikely that a stock .1 6sp car is as fast as a stock .2 6spd. For starters the .2 has a larger and more powerful engine.
 
  #7  
Old 05-21-2010 | 08:22 AM
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,934
From: ga
Rep Power: 551
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
I think you will need more than one test to draw that conclusion. However, who knows how many 6 speeds will even be tested. Or how much effort Porsche put into the 6speed Turbo at all, knowing that most all of them sold would be PDK. Will have to also get both on the dyno to see what they are really making.
 
  #8  
Old 05-21-2010 | 08:54 AM
kip's Avatar
kip
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,330
From: Northern Europe
Rep Power: 76
kip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by speed21
Seems unlikely that a stock .1 6sp car is as fast as a stock .2 6spd. For starters the .2 has a larger and more powerful engine.
The turbo max boost pressure with sport chrono etc. is 0.2 lower in the 3.8 TT, so its not all increase!

Usually they try their best at road and track to get the most out of these cars.
 
  #9  
Old 05-21-2010 | 09:06 AM
kip's Avatar
kip
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,330
From: Northern Europe
Rep Power: 76
kip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by bbywu
There has not been a head to head comparison between the 997TT and the DFI/PDK 997TT. The information being discussed here is based on two separate runs from SportAuto, tested on two different days.

According to SportAuto, the DFI 997 Turbo takes 31.5 seconds to travel from 200-300 km/h.

The 997 Turbo took 28.8 seconds for the same velocity range.
Actually the information discussed here was from road and Track, and the PDK/Tiptronic was from Autobild Sportcars (Nothing to do with Sport Auto!)

The Autobild inforamtion was only taken for reference, besause there are not many tiptronic tests around to compare, and in any test in any weather the PDK is faster than all of the rest (including 6speed and tiprtronic). Most of the 2007 tests were made with 6 speed manual.

The thing that we are talking about, which is surprising, that the 6speed 997.1 and 997.2 were equally fast in ROAD AND TRACK TESTS, WHICH was REALLY surprising to me and suggests the 3.6 and 3.8 engines perform similarly, maybe due to the fact the 3.8 has a lower max turboboost?

I have also heard that these machines with AWD are really hard to dyno, as EVO magazine and Teknikens Värld in Sweden had trouble of getting reliable dyno results due to the AWD reacting badly to the dyno.

NOT saying that the 3.8 is slower, just raising a conversation based on observations on 6speed manual comparisons in Road and Track.

AND to comment on your comparison on separate dates, the Nissan GT-R times were also tested on the same date 2008/2010 and if you look carefully above the 2008 gt-r was substantially slower pointing to the fact that the weather in 2008 was not better than the weather in 2010.
 

Last edited by kip; 05-21-2010 at 09:09 AM.
  #10  
Old 05-21-2010 | 10:37 AM
bbywu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,778
From: OR Room 5
Rep Power: 1006
bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by kip
Actually the information discussed here was from road and Track, and the PDK/Tiptronic was from Autobild Sportcars (Nothing to do with Sport Auto!)
LOL, I was not responding to your original post.

The numbers I quoted were in response to the two prior posts by skandalis and mhh, questioning if the 997.2 was slower to 300 km/h. R&T/Autobild did not reach that velocity in their testing...because no one else responded, I posted the quoted time is from September 2009 SportAuto.
 

Last edited by bbywu; 05-21-2010 at 10:49 AM.
  #11  
Old 05-22-2010 | 03:28 AM
kip's Avatar
kip
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,330
From: Northern Europe
Rep Power: 76
kip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by bbywu
LOL, I was not responding to your original post.

The numbers I quoted were in response to the two prior posts by skandalis and mhh, questioning if the 997.2 was slower to 300 km/h. R&T/Autobild did not reach that velocity in their testing...because no one else responded, I posted the quoted time is from September 2009 SportAuto.
LOL, missed that completely....
 
  #12  
Old 05-22-2010 | 08:23 AM
skandalis447's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,671
From: Athens
Rep Power: 133
skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !
Perhaps gearing might have a role in that...
 
  #13  
Old 05-22-2010 | 08:03 PM
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,083
From: Texas
Rep Power: 671
Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !
The short answer is yes. PDK shifts incredibly fast, the car never falls out of boost.

On pump my car makes about 580 rwhp. My friends PDK ran me pretty even from 40-130, I started pulling slightly above 90 mph.

I had to run a bit of race gas and turn up the boost to put him in his place

The PDK is a freakishly fast car, the only stock car that can out accelerate it is the Veyron.
 
  #14  
Old 05-23-2010 | 03:09 PM
CPIGUY's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 380
From: Westlake Village
Rep Power: 56
CPIGUY has a reputation beyond reputeCPIGUY has a reputation beyond reputeCPIGUY has a reputation beyond reputeCPIGUY has a reputation beyond reputeCPIGUY has a reputation beyond reputeCPIGUY has a reputation beyond reputeCPIGUY has a reputation beyond reputeCPIGUY has a reputation beyond reputeCPIGUY has a reputation beyond reputeCPIGUY has a reputation beyond reputeCPIGUY has a reputation beyond repute
Got to love it!!! My next addition to the stable.
 
  #15  
Old 05-23-2010 | 03:18 PM
Guibo's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 561
From: US
Rep Power: 63
Guibo has a reputation beyond reputeGuibo has a reputation beyond reputeGuibo has a reputation beyond reputeGuibo has a reputation beyond reputeGuibo has a reputation beyond reputeGuibo has a reputation beyond reputeGuibo has a reputation beyond reputeGuibo has a reputation beyond reputeGuibo has a reputation beyond reputeGuibo has a reputation beyond reputeGuibo has a reputation beyond repute
PDK isn't the only reason, but based on data from Road & Track (using a manual 997.2 Turbo) and Car & Driver (PDK), the differences in times when a shift occurs can't be ignored.

R&T vs C&D
30-40 mph: 0.4s vs 0.6s
40-50: 1.2 vs 0.6 (manual has a shift)
50-60: 0.7 vs 0.6
60-70: 0.7 vs 0.7
70-80: 1.5 vs 1.0 (manual has a shift)
80-90: 1.0 vs 1.0
90-100: 1.2 vs 1.2
100-110: 1.8 vs 1.4 (manual has a shift)
110-120: 1.6 vs 1.5
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:40 AM.