will post numbers or pictures of racelogic but have to wait for weather...

on maha dyno 785ps and 860Nm with 1,4 bar boost at the middle and 1,05 bar boost at the top.

now I'm running 1,55 at the middle and 1,3 at the top but don't know the power.
I know that new sachs clutch kit with 764 pressure plate burned during first acceleration on 4th gear.

 

"100-200 5.04 sec in 212m with 2 shifts" -it's very fast with 2 shifts

 

I have done some calculation trying to estimate the 997tt number from the vette data. and here is what I came up with

using the acceleration formula. setting Vi 100kmh and Vf 200kmh as fixed values. estimating the distance to be at its lowest value 30m shorter. now we can estimate the time. I also calculated the error by using same method to calculate zo6 time and compare it to real( calculated VS actual ). I applied same error to the porsche timing to be more accurate.

100-200 4.5sec 190m ( subtracted about 22m from the zo6)
60-130 5.6 240m ( subtracted about 30m from zo6 distance )

taking in consideration this was 2 shifts run, so the car could save about .6 sec like with evo car. 100-200 4.79 with 2 shifts and 4.14 with one shift.

I think the car we have is capable of low 4 or high 3 sec 100-200

I could be wrong with my calculation or method used, but this was my best try.

 

it's the fastest vette we have in our region.

 

In heard URG Lambo with 1900whp on the wheels run 2.5 sec 100-200

 

Your friend's car can use some tweaking. That's a lot of mods for only 6.2s. With my 63.5 mm vtgs, I'm running 5.8s 100-200 on race fuel.

 

finally I understood that you all running those great times on race fuel, we don't.
German tuners offer cams in their kits over 620PS....


btw this car did 400m in 10.85 sec

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psmcpd5PuBw

 

So you are making more torque than 860NM...since that clutch is rated to 900NM...


Considering Switzer is pushing 800HP on A28's, these numbers are very low IMO...Something has to be wrong with that car..

 

This car belongs to the guy that sold me his A3071's... really nice guy to deal with.

 

correct, he is doing service to my car here in poland.
I think again U.S power numbers are very optimistic.

so as you can see it's not bad for 600ps I mean 10,85sec.
intake temp was over 55C as ambient was 30C that day.

there is no problem, everything is working, no knocking, boost , ignition all fine....but the program is from U.S.

 

Even with 93 pump fuel, I can get 6.2s 100-200, so either there is something really bad about your fuel or the car needs a tune-up. No reason to have all those mods if it's underperforming.

 

Well, on some cases I'm with you, but some dynos are really conservative, like the Mustang..

And then we (as european) have the bad habit of rating HP's to the cranck, which is a big mistake IMO.

If we look at the real world numbers, their (US tuners) power claims seem very fair to me. Even taking into account pump gas VS race gas.

 

so you want to tell me guys car with this kit

http://evoms.com/marketplace/ViewProduct.asp?Now=2/19/2011+12:02:14+PM&ProductID={4F354040-B8FF-4B70-9134-40452DC4625D}&OrgID={CA5E16BC-D877-4137-8237-7EB9084DD3D8}&ParentID={A48CF5CC-AACE-4425-93CC-CC302D1701ED}&Curr={A48CF5CC-AACE-4425-93CC-CC302D1701ED}

will do 400m in 10,85sec?
600 is 600 correct?

this car is faster than 997tt with modd vtgs....

btw I'm also shocked with this result, owner is not happy at all.

 

Well, on 3071's the guess of my tuner is 650 crank on a conservative tune.
So the times and HP figure of Dominik's car (the one in the video) seem about right.

 

I do 100-200 in 5,5sec at the moment and we are working on the ecu since it pulls timing and let boost out at 3000-4000 rpm