so I dynoed my car today on maha....
#108
02-27-2011, 03:04 PM
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Warsaw
Posts: 1,041
Rep Power: 91 
I found this long with 100-200 in 4,75 sec
if there is someone who can post it I love to send it.
thanks !
in log I mentioned you will also find 100-250km/h in 9,11 sec.
Bob, I'm sending this log to you, will not bother you anymore, thanks.
Last edited by 997 GT3 RS/TT; 02-27-2011 at 03:16 PM.
#111
02-27-2011, 03:28 PM
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Warsaw
Posts: 1,041
Rep Power: 91 thank you.
so whom vtg car accelerate like this on low boost?
#112
02-27-2011, 03:29 PM
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Warsaw
Posts: 1,041
Rep Power: 91
what do you mean?
#113
02-27-2011, 03:45 PM
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Warsaw
Posts: 1,041
Rep Power: 91
intake temp rise 14C during 100-250km acceleration.
is this good?
btw you have convince me, will build the second engine I have.
I will pass 850Ps on low boost.
is this good?
btw you have convince me, will build the second engine I have.
I will pass 850Ps on low boost.
#114
02-27-2011, 04:18 PM
What do you mean accelerate like this and low boost? How many Gs are you talking about? Some of your datalogs are 1.55 bar. That's not low boost. Is it just me that's confused? 
Why don't you tell us exactly what mods you have and times for those mods? If you're talking about gt3071s, are you saying your set-up is the fastest? We already know 3071s produce more power at lower boost that vtgs, so what's new here? What am I missing?
His boost can fall off for a number of reasons but without knowing what supporting mods he's running, it's anybody's guess. This thread would be more interesting if things were specified. He's making nice power but I wouldn't say spectacular based on other gt3071s I've seen.
Why don't you tell us exactly what mods you have and times for those mods? If you're talking about gt3071s, are you saying your set-up is the fastest? We already know 3071s produce more power at lower boost that vtgs, so what's new here? What am I missing?His boost can fall off for a number of reasons but without knowing what supporting mods he's running, it's anybody's guess. This thread would be more interesting if things were specified. He's making nice power but I wouldn't say spectacular based on other gt3071s I've seen.
Last edited by TTdude; 02-27-2011 at 04:22 PM.
#115
02-27-2011, 04:23 PM
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Warsaw
Posts: 1,041
Rep Power: 91
I mean acceleration from last data log Bob posted, 100-250km/h.
1,55 is only up to 5000rpm and at 7200rpm it's 1,16.
so I would call this low boost.
1,55 is only up to 5000rpm and at 7200rpm it's 1,16.
so I would call this low boost.
Last edited by 997 GT3 RS/TT; 02-27-2011 at 04:26 PM.
#116
02-27-2011, 04:25 PM
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Warsaw
Posts: 1,041
Rep Power: 91 What do you mean accelerate like this and low boost? How many Gs are you talking about? Some of your datalogs are 1.55 bar. That's not low boost. Is it just me that's confused? Why don't you tell us exactly what mods you have and times for those mods? If you're talking about gt3071s, are you saying your set-up is the fastest? We already know 3071s produce more power at lower boost that vtgs, so what's new here? What am I missing?
His boost can fall off for a number of reasons but without knowing what supporting mods he's running, it's anybody's guess. This thread would be more interesting if things were specified. He's making nice power but I wouldn't say spectacular based on other gt3071s I've seen.
Why don't you tell us exactly what mods you have and times for those mods? If you're talking about gt3071s, are you saying your set-up is the fastest? We already know 3071s produce more power at lower boost that vtgs, so what's new here? What am I missing?His boost can fall off for a number of reasons but without knowing what supporting mods he's running, it's anybody's guess. This thread would be more interesting if things were specified. He's making nice power but I wouldn't say spectacular based on other gt3071s I've seen.
what do you mean my boost fall?
#117
02-27-2011, 04:28 PM
According to the graph Bob posted your boost falls off quite a bit. Why doesn't it hold 1.55 to red-line is the question?
#118
02-27-2011, 04:30 PM
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Warsaw
Posts: 1,041
Rep Power: 91 but no need for that, my programmer did this not accidentally.
no need to run on high boost to produce power.
#119
02-27-2011, 04:35 PM
That was the question, whether it was programmed or a result of your mods. Thanks for your answer. So why did your programmer do this? Don't you want to see the max your set-up can produce? Right now I would say you are de-tuned.
#120
02-27-2011, 04:42 PM
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Warsaw
Posts: 1,041
Rep Power: 91
ok, never mind...I just want to show that there is way to produce torque and power on mid boost level on regular fuel, that is all.
100-250km/h in 9,1 is that fast? no idea but probably nothing special.
let's finish here.
100-250km/h in 9,1 is that fast? no idea but probably nothing special.
let's finish here.