997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.

5.90sec 60-130mph Record - 997.2 Turbo - PTF protune and exhaust, pump gas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #91  
Old 12-04-2014 | 12:05 PM
jjurroz's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 243
From: Miami, FL.
Rep Power: 39
jjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant future
I love the idea of correcting for flatness. Why this feature didn't gain any traction is beyond me. Maybe you should offer two graphs, one corrected and one uncorrected and leave it up to the boards/websites who list the times decide which one they want to accept. I can see boards having two lists.


-Jose

Originally Posted by PencilGeek
Finding a flat road is really impossible. Even a drag strip is about a 1% grade (but usually uphill from my observations). So that's how hard it is to find a flat road.

In general, I agree with the 3% rule, but think there should be a limit on an intermediate slope. For example, you can travel slightly uphill on the beginning of a run, peak the hill around 80 MPH, then have a -9% slope for the rest of the run and still come out to a net 3% slope and a valid run. But that -9% during the fastest part of the run will play a large role. This example was taken from a real-life case, and I have passed that information along to others wishing to set a world record. It seems to work very well. But maybe, just maybe there should be a limit on the intermediate slope encountered during the run.

The software at www.vboxtools.com was written with this in mind. There are both maximum limits and intermediate limits on the the verification. These limits are all documented at the bottom of your results when you submit a file to vboxtools.com. But since nobody could really agree on what the intermediate limit should be (in fact, nobody even agreed with me that such a limit should even exist), I set it to -10% for 60-130's which is pretty liberal and effectively disables the feature.

I also came up with an idea to "flatten" the road and normalize the results to a flat road. I actually have this feature programmed in, but disabled on vboxtools.com and perfdb.com (it's available on perfdb.org). I came up with the idea to normalize the results, just so we could take slope out of the equation. I passed my calculations to my physics buddies, and they agreed I was doing it the right way. Maybe, somebody would want to start a site/master list only using normalized results.
 
  #92  
Old 12-04-2014 | 12:46 PM
proTUNING Freaks's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 864
From: Toronto - Chicago
Rep Power: 0
proTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by PencilGeek
It's true the files are not data encrypted. The DBN files do have a CRC to verify integrity, while the VBO files do not. The software at vboxtools.com will verify the CRC on DBN files. Since no such CRC exists on the VBO files, there is no CRC verification for them. You can tell which files a user submits because that is documented in the graphs generated where it says "File Type: DBN" etc. I can see from the graphs Costas has posted, he's always submitted DBN files.

If DBN files were hand crafted or manipulated, the user would need to regenerate the CRC for each line of the DBN file. The CRC used by racelogic is a bit of a ***** to figure out -- the DBN version is not defined as it's documented on their user forum for other devices. The DBN version is different that what they've documented. So anybody wanting to cheat would not only need to figure out the difference, but then figure out how to regenerate the CRC for each line of the file. Of course it can be done, but it's a lot of work.

I'm intentionally limiting my comments to the vbox device, file format, and explaining how vboxtools.com software is designed and operates. I hope this helps.
Thank you for explaining that in detail and confirming how difficult it would be for most people to spoof a DBN type vbox file. This is probably why vbox has been adopted as widely as it has been for timing acceleration runs.
 
  #93  
Old 12-04-2014 | 04:27 PM
LostMarine's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 256
From: nj
Rep Power: 83
LostMarine Is a GOD !LostMarine Is a GOD !LostMarine Is a GOD !LostMarine Is a GOD !LostMarine Is a GOD !LostMarine Is a GOD !LostMarine Is a GOD !LostMarine Is a GOD !LostMarine Is a GOD !LostMarine Is a GOD !LostMarine Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by madsex343
Even though I was trying very very hard NOT to direct you all these years (after all the threats and swearing and general behaviour towards me back when you were Stickys buddy (in lack of a more strong word) ) at many forums he owns but also under different accounts @M3post from which you were both banned, I will for only this once reply to you:
I was dead certain that you had something to do with prodigy's outrage and with wolfhedges attack (while you behaved in here quite good at the same time) as you now confirm... I do not see an entire community brought tgether to call out a fraud (a fraud that Dzenno definately has proven with his great posts above is most certainly attainable in this car)... I see 3000views in the thread and only 3 guys (2 of them are you and the other one misinformed by you obviously) attacking ME personally (like old times) and again bringing old grudges and insisting on childish arguments driven by sheer dislike/content/hate (I can not think of a better word) towards me personally!

Only members here who used to have M3's might remember your epic attacks not only towards me but towards Drew etc...

Anyway this is completely irrelevant to this PDK thread as I believe is your contribution to the thread since you do not own a 911 nor have you ever worked/vbox/driven a 997.2tt to come out as a specialist and give us your expert opinion on the matter!

I repeat whatever you say I will not reply to you again!

P.S. The story about me fiddling with the files at a software level is even more ridiculous than me running nitrous on a 997.2!!! Mike has the entire (start to finish period run (not only the 60-130mph part)) dbn file at his email and I welcome anyone to ask him if it is correct or not
Are you implying that history repeats itself? Id say a history of fraudulent 60-130s is pretty significant. I hope you know there are people currently recreating your manipulation. I said it years ago, and your crowd defended you only to reverse themselves later since their big HP cars are still .5 off your record run, and this is on the east coast where we actually have good air that can account for a few 1/10s improvement...

anways, im not going to get into this with you, but your wrong on many levels, first with who conspires with whom, that everyone is watching and waiting (they dont have to comment publicly to pull together to oust a fraud) and your attempts at ego boosted world records*

*not an actual record
 
  #94  
Old 12-04-2014 | 04:43 PM
proTUNING Freaks's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 864
From: Toronto - Chicago
Rep Power: 0
proTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond repute
We'd like to distance ourselves as a tuning company from this discussion due to apparent controversial nature of the vbox result reported.

We are here to help our customers get the most out of their cars through tuning support and choosing appropriate upgrade paths that we have tested to the best of our ability and found to work well. Results posted by us going forward will exclusively be of our shop cars with any relevant data required and will include multiple runs to demonstrate consistency and repeatibility properly reflecting what our future customers may be able to expect from tuning with us.

If this thread can be removed we would appreciate it and would kindly ask the moderators to do so.

Kind regards
 
  #95  
Old 12-04-2014 | 05:17 PM
GT3 Chuck's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 14,915
From: California
Rep Power: 1002
GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !GT3 Chuck Is a GOD !
Can't remove t but since you are the op I can close it
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PenguiN
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
9
04-22-2021 07:33 PM
BlackMarketRacing
996 Turbo / GT2
37
12-08-2015 01:49 PM
alevine
GT3/GT2
19
11-04-2015 10:05 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 5.90sec 60-130mph Record - 997.2 Turbo - PTF protune and exhaust, pump gas



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:26 PM.