Buy or lease ?
#17
No right answer other than to compare the two alternatives. If you're thinking about a 3 year lease, look at how much you will have to pay over those three years (including any down payment, etc.). Compare this to how much you will spend if you buy the car and then sell it after 3 years (you going to have to estimate the potential sales price). Also factor in the loss of use on the extra $$ you pay every month on the loan payment versus the lease payment.
That being said, I've typically found that unless the manufacturer is subsidizing the lease (which they sometimes do to move slow selling models), you're usually better off buying the car.
That being said, I've typically found that unless the manufacturer is subsidizing the lease (which they sometimes do to move slow selling models), you're usually better off buying the car.
#18
I will lose Zero in bonds unless the world collapses and I'll make my 5.25% tax free. I do hope your gold works out and doesn't halve your investment.
There's investment and then there's speculation...
#19
Well we should all be so greatful that you are so knowledgeable and, of course, so eloquent in your presentation of what you do "know"!
#20
You are joking, right? State of CT GA bonds, AAA rated, are turning into Junk? Bwahahaha... No, gold probably won't go to zero, but the last time it ran up to almost $700, it came back down to about $350.
I will lose Zero in bonds unless the world collapses and I'll make my 5.25% tax free. I do hope your gold works out and doesn't halve your investment.
There's investment and then there's speculation...
I will lose Zero in bonds unless the world collapses and I'll make my 5.25% tax free. I do hope your gold works out and doesn't halve your investment.
There's investment and then there's speculation...
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2007...alance-sheets/
Oh, and my `speculation' in gold, up 22% annualized since 99. Don't bother asking how my agricultures `speculation' has gone.
Last edited by CaymanSJF; 12-20-2007 at 05:41 PM.
#21
its not florida muni muni bond hlders that are in trouble - its the municipalties and schools districts themselves - they reached for a tiny bit of extra yield by buying SIVS backed by very riskt sub prime mortgages and other low quality bonds..many of the SIVS they bought are illquid and in some cases insolvant - they will ose money..the majority of municipa bonds issues are very high quality - but defaults do occur - they are not riskless!
#22
its not florida muni muni bond hlders that are in trouble - its the municipalties and schools districts themselves - they reached for a tiny bit of extra yield by buying SIVS backed by very riskt sub prime mortgages and other low quality bonds..many of the SIVS they bought are illquid and in some cases insolvant - they will ose money..the majority of municipa bonds issues are very high quality - but defaults do occur - they are not riskless!
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...f172044S26.DTL
#24
It amazes me how out to lunch the ratings agencies have been on this crap. How some of these vehicles ever got an A rating, let alone AAA is beyond my comprehension. The lawyers will have a field day on Moody's and S&P out of this and one, maybe both, may go the way of Arthur Andersen after the Enron debacle.
#25
they made a couple bad assumptions
1. houses only go up in value - BIG mistake
2. the sum is greater than the parts - diversification doesnt help when you pool a bunch of **** together
ofcourse fraud has hurt as well..
NINJA loans are a bad idea (NINJA = no income, no job, no assets)
why did someone who makes $30k/year think they can afford a $300k house?
classic mania craze - now we pay for it
the key is to figure out the next mania - we had tulips,realestate, .coms, china, commodities...im hoping water is next...PHO - load the boat!
1. houses only go up in value - BIG mistake
2. the sum is greater than the parts - diversification doesnt help when you pool a bunch of **** together
ofcourse fraud has hurt as well..
NINJA loans are a bad idea (NINJA = no income, no job, no assets)
why did someone who makes $30k/year think they can afford a $300k house?
classic mania craze - now we pay for it
the key is to figure out the next mania - we had tulips,realestate, .coms, china, commodities...im hoping water is next...PHO - load the boat!
#26
they made a couple bad assumptions
1. houses only go up in value - BIG mistake
2. the sum is greater than the parts - diversification doesnt help when you pool a bunch of **** together
ofcourse fraud has hurt as well..
NINJA loans are a bad idea (NINJA = no income, no job, no assets)
why did someone who makes $30k/year think they can afford a $300k house?
classic mania craze - now we pay for it
the key is to figure out the next mania - we had tulips,realestate, .coms, china, commodities...im hoping water is next...PHO - load the boat!
1. houses only go up in value - BIG mistake
2. the sum is greater than the parts - diversification doesnt help when you pool a bunch of **** together
ofcourse fraud has hurt as well..
NINJA loans are a bad idea (NINJA = no income, no job, no assets)
why did someone who makes $30k/year think they can afford a $300k house?
classic mania craze - now we pay for it
the key is to figure out the next mania - we had tulips,realestate, .coms, china, commodities...im hoping water is next...PHO - load the boat!
Do you remember the first mortgage you took out? I was sweating bullets. Had to get all that documentation and then go through the 3rd degree...many what an ordeal it used to be...and will be again...
#28
Best O'luck.....
#29
Great! I'm going the opposite way of the pro!
I'm lucky I'm not driving a Kia.
#30
No such thing as pros. Self included