997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.

AfterHours Sport Pipes dyno results posted - (vids coming)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #61  
Old 10-23-2008, 05:40 PM
raffi's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: los angeles
Age: 46
Posts: 1,126
Rep Power: 64
raffi is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by p0rsch3
Anytime Tuesday through Friday next week works for me, around noon is good.

perfect, i will let dave know.
 
  #62  
Old 10-24-2008, 01:24 AM
Ian_UK1's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 407
Rep Power: 40
Ian_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by deputydog95
What makes these mufflers different from the other ones out there? It's pretty much proven time and time again that mufflers don't make power. How do they do it?
I don't think the AH mufflers are different here - it's more to do with the difference between the standard 'S' and 'non-S' mufflers. You are absolutely right that on a 997S, 'straight-through' mufflers/resonators don't make much (if any) power by themselves as the standard 'S' cans are quite free-flowing. The story is different for a non-S 3.6 however. IIRC, the internal design of the 3.6 muffler is completely different (and more restrictive) than the 'S' design. Replacing the mufflers on a non-S 997 (or 3.6 996 for that matter) with a good aftermarket design has always been good for 10BHP or so.

It would be interesting to see if the 3.6 benefitted from fitting standard 'S' mufflers (and tips, they're bigger diameter and will flow better). As the 'S' muffler/tip combo is more free flowing, there's no reason why a 3.6 shouldn't pick up some power from doing this. And there are hundreds of standard 'S' mufflers lying around and available for almost zero money.... Anyone like to try this?
 
  #63  
Old 10-24-2008, 03:19 AM
808c2s's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,364
Rep Power: 115
808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !
Ian,

You brought up a good point here.

Originally Posted by Ian_UK1
I don't think the AH mufflers are different here - it's more to do with the difference between the standard 'S' and 'non-S' mufflers. You are absolutely right that on a 997S, 'straight-through' mufflers/resonators don't make much (if any) power by themselves as the standard 'S' cans are quite free-flowing. The story is different for a non-S 3.6 however. IIRC, the internal design of the 3.6 muffler is completely different (and more restrictive) than the 'S' design. Replacing the mufflers on a non-S 997 (or 3.6 996 for that matter) with a good aftermarket design has always been good for 10BHP or so.

It would be interesting to see if the 3.6 benefitted from fitting standard 'S' mufflers (and tips, they're bigger diameter and will flow better). As the 'S' muffler/tip combo is more free flowing, there's no reason why a 3.6 shouldn't pick up some power from doing this. And there are hundreds of standard 'S' mufflers lying around and available for almost zero money.... Anyone like to try this?
 
  #64  
Old 10-24-2008, 10:31 AM
p0rsch3's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chained to my Laptop....
Posts: 3,124
Rep Power: 170
p0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Ian_UK1
I don't think the AH mufflers are different here - it's more to do with the difference between the standard 'S' and 'non-S' mufflers. You are absolutely right that on a 997S, 'straight-through' mufflers/resonators don't make much (if any) power by themselves as the standard 'S' cans are quite free-flowing. The story is different for a non-S 3.6 however. IIRC, the internal design of the 3.6 muffler is completely different (and more restrictive) than the 'S' design. Replacing the mufflers on a non-S 997 (or 3.6 996 for that matter) with a good aftermarket design has always been good for 10BHP or so.

It would be interesting to see if the 3.6 benefitted from fitting standard 'S' mufflers (and tips, they're bigger diameter and will flow better). As the 'S' muffler/tip combo is more free flowing, there's no reason why a 3.6 shouldn't pick up some power from doing this. And there are hundreds of standard 'S' mufflers lying around and available for almost zero money.... Anyone like to try this?

Possibly, but it's highly speculative IMO until someone dynos it. Remember, folks are putting on hacked stock cans and PSE mufflers and not picking up any noted gains. I also think too, if doing this did provide an inexpensive performance gain there would be tons of posts on the "swap 997 for 997S muffler mod" topic, but I don't see mention of it anywhere (and the 997S cans would be going for a lot more $$ on the used market!).

I've seen the inside of a 997 muffler (but not an S muffler), and the AH muffler design is clearly visible from the outside- They seem completely different to my eyes, AH is completely straight through and factory is chambered with offset inlet / exit pipes. Can you explain to me how they are the same? I'm just trying to understand your comparative perspective.

Overall I think there is some good logic to your point, if non-S and S mufflers are indeed different internally, one would think that putting S mufflers on a non-S car would show improvement.
 
  #65  
Old 10-24-2008, 10:40 AM
Gundo's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ridgefield, CT
Posts: 426
Rep Power: 50
Gundo has much to be proud ofGundo has much to be proud ofGundo has much to be proud ofGundo has much to be proud ofGundo has much to be proud ofGundo has much to be proud ofGundo has much to be proud ofGundo has much to be proud ofGundo has much to be proud of
I'm pretty sure the part numbers for S and non-S mufflers are identical.

Actually, this was not true.

here are the part numbers:

997 - 997.111.221.03 and 997.111.222.03
997 S - 997.111.421.04 and 997.111.422.04
 

Last edited by Gundo; 10-27-2008 at 10:42 AM. Reason: My bad
  #66  
Old 10-24-2008, 11:23 AM
p0rsch3's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chained to my Laptop....
Posts: 3,124
Rep Power: 170
p0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond repute
Gundo- from one obervation the non-S muffler exit pipe is "squashed" narrower at the end than the S exit pipe. So that would probably warrant a different part number.
I'll always be scratching my head why Porsche did that??
 
  #67  
Old 10-24-2008, 11:11 PM
p0rsch3's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chained to my Laptop....
Posts: 3,124
Rep Power: 170
p0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond repute
So here are the latest results from todays dyno run-

1st run was with stock mufflers, kn intake and no rss plenum.
2nd and 3rd runs were with AfterHours mufflers, kn intake and no rss plenum.
I wanted to see what additional gains the plenum was giving me at the previous dyno testing. It is clear to see that the plenum does indeed improve performance numbers.

My stock muffler run was 257 TQ and 296 HP without the plenum.
My stock muffler run was 273 TQ / 313 HP with the plenum.
-So a net gain of 15 TQ / 17 HP at the wheels with the plenum, stock mufflers and kn intake, not too bad for just a couple of minor mods.

In both dyno sessions (with and without the plenum installed) the AH exhaust added an average 11 TQ / 11 HP additional gain over the stock mufflers.
With the plenum and the AH pipes together, I estimate a total avg. gain of 26 TQ / 28 HP.
So this confirms my feeling that the car feels much stronger overall with both of these mods.
This is my best attempt at trying to accurately document everything, which I hope helps others who are considering either of these parts for their pcar.

BTW I got pulled over today on the way back from the dyno.... by some guy in a minivan wildly waving me down. Turns out he has a 997 and wanted to know where I got my exhaust because it sounded so awesome!! LOL how is that??

Todays dyno chart (no RSS plenum installed):




Last weeks dyno runs (with RSS plenum):
 

Last edited by p0rsch3; 10-25-2008 at 12:44 AM.
  #68  
Old 10-25-2008, 12:08 AM
v35's Avatar
v35
v35 is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: socal
Age: 38
Posts: 2,390
Rep Power: 142
v35 has a reputation beyond reputev35 has a reputation beyond reputev35 has a reputation beyond reputev35 has a reputation beyond reputev35 has a reputation beyond reputev35 has a reputation beyond reputev35 has a reputation beyond reputev35 has a reputation beyond reputev35 has a reputation beyond reputev35 has a reputation beyond reputev35 has a reputation beyond repute
guys there is no difference between non s and 's' mufflers internally. The only difference is the tip of the mufflers where the tips are attached. They are a different size so that you can not interchange the tips without some modification to keep the 2 models distinct from one another.
 

Last edited by v35; 10-25-2008 at 12:39 AM.
  #69  
Old 10-25-2008, 06:40 AM
Ian_UK1's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 407
Rep Power: 40
Ian_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by p0rsch3
Possibly, but it's highly speculative IMO until someone dynos it. Remember, folks are putting on hacked stock cans and PSE mufflers and not picking up any noted gains. I also think too, if doing this did provide an inexpensive performance gain there would be tons of posts on the "swap 997 for 997S muffler mod" topic, but I don't see mention of it anywhere (and the 997S cans would be going for a lot more $$ on the used market!).

I've seen the inside of a 997 muffler (but not an S muffler), and the AH muffler design is clearly visible from the outside- They seem completely different to my eyes, AH is completely straight through and factory is chambered with offset inlet / exit pipes. Can you explain to me how they are the same? I'm just trying to understand your comparative perspective.

Overall I think there is some good logic to your point, if non-S and S mufflers are indeed different internally, one would think that putting S mufflers on a non-S car would show improvement.
Sorry if I didn't make my point as clearly as I should. The point I was trying to make wasn't about 'S' mufflers vs AH - my comments on the possibilitiy of the 'S' muffler giving an increase was just an afterthought! The point I was making was that the gains shown by the AH mufflers aren't different from other straight-through, aftermarket designs. It's down to the fact that the 3.6 seems to benefit well from the fitment of straight-through mufflers, in a way that the 3.8 doesn't. Most straight-through designs give around 10BHP on the 3.6. The added adantage of the AH seems to be very light weight. I would doubt the AH will give as much of an improvement on an 'S', just as other aftermarket mufflers don't.
 
  #70  
Old 10-25-2008, 10:22 AM
p0rsch3's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chained to my Laptop....
Posts: 3,124
Rep Power: 170
p0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond repute
Hi Ian- Good points indeed. All I honestly know so far is data from this product on my car. What is overall of note to me is the gain in both TQ and HP, not just HP alone. For a muffler swap alone it does seem better than expected.
I don't know of any other straight-through designs for 997 to compare. When I was shopping around, M&K and Jubily/Zero Int'l make a similar system but only for 996 (AFAIK).
Can you post up some mfr info on the other 997 straight-through systems you are aware of?

I'd love to see some dyno numbers from an S for comparison, could very well be less of a gain since the 3.8 is fairly optimized as-is. I guess we'll have to wait until someone out there with an S + AH pipes throws their car on the dyno.
 
  #71  
Old 10-25-2008, 10:59 AM
deputydog95's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 9,541
Rep Power: 502
deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !
If it's a straight through design, why not save a few bucks and go with a muffler bypass? I would guess the sound is very similar.
 
  #72  
Old 10-25-2008, 11:08 AM
p0rsch3's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chained to my Laptop....
Posts: 3,124
Rep Power: 170
p0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by deputydog95
If it's a straight through design, why not save a few bucks and go with a muffler bypass? I would guess the sound is very similar.
Not from my experience- I ran with bypass pipes for a few days before finding the AH mufflers. Bypass pipes dropped TQ numbers on my car and only added a couple hp up top. This would seem consistent with other posts I've read here that the flat six likes some backpressure. I think the AH introduces some backpressure by running a length of pipe equivalent to the overall run of the factory mufflers, and a couple of turns, along with the two resonator sections. This is just my speculation.
Sound was very mean at WOT, but sounded bad (IMO) at idle / off idle. Couldn't even hear myself think in the car. Was a fun experience though just so I knew what others were talking about with using them.
 

Last edited by p0rsch3; 10-25-2008 at 11:13 AM.
  #73  
Old 10-25-2008, 02:30 PM
RSSmike's Avatar
Former Vendor
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Costa Mesa
Posts: 113
Rep Power: 0
RSSmike has a reputation beyond reputeRSSmike has a reputation beyond reputeRSSmike has a reputation beyond reputeRSSmike has a reputation beyond reputeRSSmike has a reputation beyond reputeRSSmike has a reputation beyond reputeRSSmike has a reputation beyond reputeRSSmike has a reputation beyond reputeRSSmike has a reputation beyond reputeRSSmike has a reputation beyond reputeRSSmike has a reputation beyond repute
Nice post and dyno!

Kurt,

Nice post and dyno! We were wondering what you have been up to? Well documented post. Congratulations on the power gains, and thanks for the postive mention.

Mike
SP/RSS




Originally Posted by p0rsch3
So here are the latest results from todays dyno run-

1st run was with stock mufflers, kn intake and no rss plenum.
2nd and 3rd runs were with AfterHours mufflers, kn intake and no rss plenum.
I wanted to see what additional gains the plenum was giving me at the previous dyno testing. It is clear to see that the plenum does indeed improve performance numbers.

My stock muffler run was 257 TQ and 296 HP without the plenum.
My stock muffler run was 273 TQ / 313 HP with the plenum.
-So a net gain of 15 TQ / 17 HP at the wheels with the plenum, stock mufflers and kn intake, not too bad for just a couple of minor mods.

In both dyno sessions (with and without the plenum installed) the AH exhaust added an average 11 TQ / 11 HP additional gain over the stock mufflers.
With the plenum and the AH pipes together, I estimate a total avg. gain of 26 TQ / 28 HP.
So this confirms my feeling that the car feels much stronger overall with both of these mods.
This is my best attempt at trying to accurately document everything, which I hope helps others who are considering either of these parts for their pcar.

BTW I got pulled over today on the way back from the dyno.... by some guy in a minivan wildly waving me down. Turns out he has a 997 and wanted to know where I got my exhaust because it sounded so awesome!! LOL how is that??

Todays dyno chart (no RSS plenum installed):




Last weeks dyno runs (with RSS plenum):
 

Last edited by RSSmike; 10-25-2008 at 02:31 PM. Reason: typo
  #74  
Old 10-25-2008, 02:56 PM
p0rsch3's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chained to my Laptop....
Posts: 3,124
Rep Power: 170
p0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond reputep0rsch3 has a reputation beyond repute
Thanks Mike- Just been working like a dog and goofing around with car mods on my free time. I've been contemplating trying out your bored-out 997 TB, do you think it might offer any additional improvements?
 
  #75  
Old 10-27-2008, 04:13 AM
Ian_UK1's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 407
Rep Power: 40
Ian_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to beholdIan_UK1 is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by p0rsch3
Hi Ian- Good points indeed. All I honestly know so far is data from this product on my car. What is overall of note to me is the gain in both TQ and HP, not just HP alone. For a muffler swap alone it does seem better than expected.
I don't know of any other straight-through designs for 997 to compare. When I was shopping around, M&K and Jubily/Zero Int'l make a similar system but only for 996 (AFAIK).
Can you post up some mfr info on the other 997 straight-through systems you are aware of?

I'd love to see some dyno numbers from an S for comparison, could very well be less of a gain since the 3.8 is fairly optimized as-is. I guess we'll have to wait until someone out there with an S + AH pipes throws their car on the dyno.
Both Fabspeed's and AWE's mufflers are straight through designs
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: AfterHours Sport Pipes dyno results posted - (vids coming)



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 PM.