997S vs E92 M3...Thoughts/Opinions
#76
Just had to dive into this thread and join this board. (May need to change my sig soon). I have an E46 M3 and have been looking at both the E92M3 and '06C2S's. I had an E36 M3 as well. I have an SMG car and am dieing to get back to a 6 spd. I've driven a C2 and a C2S. I think the S will keep me from the mod bug for a while since it has lower ride height, 19's, better brakes and better throttle response (lighter flywheel? - or is it just the motor?).
Thing about the M3 is the versatility. I like throwing my bike in the trunk with the fold down seats. And I have 9 and 6 year olds. Finally the M3 exhaust note is decent with the V8 vs. the POS sound of my car (even with rear resonator and SS exhaust). I've basically convinced myself that if I want to stuff my kids in a 911, I'd better get one soon! Hopefully the little locates on the roof will work well for a bike rack.
The cars are comparable in price, but little else. Come on, the M3 is a highly modded 3 series. The 911 is ground up sports car. Granted, I love the M3 versatility, but the 911 is a sports car, not a GT. Much less space, much lower to the ground, much lighter. BMW makes great coupes out of the 3's.
Sounds like CURIO is trying to justify buying a DCT. I've been trying to justify buying my SMG for the past 4 years. After actually driving a couple of 911's, I'm ready to move on. 6spd in either car.
I needed to test the C2 and the C2S. Now I also need to check out a C4 to see if the heavier car is any better.
Funniest thing is that I find people checking the mileage on the M3 even on the M3 forums. 'Caus the damn thing only gets 13 MPG. Maybe fine now, but in three years values could really get killed. Heck the damn 911 will get 20 MPG. I think few of us are really concerned about mileage, but even the NY Times was writing about the last of the gas sucking 500hp cars (C63 included).
Biggest diff in driving the M3 vs. 911 is the torque. Even if they the same 0-60 or track times, the torque of the 911 vs. the weight makes it much more responsive. Just feels more fun. My E46 will hang with a 996, but I thought my E36 even had more torque at lower RPMs.
Now if only my girls will want to jump in the back "seats"...
Thing about the M3 is the versatility. I like throwing my bike in the trunk with the fold down seats. And I have 9 and 6 year olds. Finally the M3 exhaust note is decent with the V8 vs. the POS sound of my car (even with rear resonator and SS exhaust). I've basically convinced myself that if I want to stuff my kids in a 911, I'd better get one soon! Hopefully the little locates on the roof will work well for a bike rack.
The cars are comparable in price, but little else. Come on, the M3 is a highly modded 3 series. The 911 is ground up sports car. Granted, I love the M3 versatility, but the 911 is a sports car, not a GT. Much less space, much lower to the ground, much lighter. BMW makes great coupes out of the 3's.
Sounds like CURIO is trying to justify buying a DCT. I've been trying to justify buying my SMG for the past 4 years. After actually driving a couple of 911's, I'm ready to move on. 6spd in either car.
I needed to test the C2 and the C2S. Now I also need to check out a C4 to see if the heavier car is any better.
Funniest thing is that I find people checking the mileage on the M3 even on the M3 forums. 'Caus the damn thing only gets 13 MPG. Maybe fine now, but in three years values could really get killed. Heck the damn 911 will get 20 MPG. I think few of us are really concerned about mileage, but even the NY Times was writing about the last of the gas sucking 500hp cars (C63 included).
Biggest diff in driving the M3 vs. 911 is the torque. Even if they the same 0-60 or track times, the torque of the 911 vs. the weight makes it much more responsive. Just feels more fun. My E46 will hang with a 996, but I thought my E36 even had more torque at lower RPMs.
Now if only my girls will want to jump in the back "seats"...
#77
Too much has been said on 6speed comparing 997 vs M3 that it is getting boring.
I'm not going to argue which car is faster or perform better as their spec are too similar and one can always quote the magazine that praises their car. My favorite is the Road and Track test drive of 997S with a 0-60 at 3.9 second!
911 is the benchmark sport car that every sport cars company is comparing to, and dream car to a lot of men since their childhood. It is the target to beat. More prestige car such as Aston V8 is constantly targeting the 911 as they want to steal sales from them.
The only cars that want to compare with the M3 is C-class AMG, Audi S4 and Lexus IS-F. All great cars on their own, but not true sport cars. And definitely not dream car material anyway you look at them.
I'm not going to argue which car is faster or perform better as their spec are too similar and one can always quote the magazine that praises their car. My favorite is the Road and Track test drive of 997S with a 0-60 at 3.9 second!
911 is the benchmark sport car that every sport cars company is comparing to, and dream car to a lot of men since their childhood. It is the target to beat. More prestige car such as Aston V8 is constantly targeting the 911 as they want to steal sales from them.
The only cars that want to compare with the M3 is C-class AMG, Audi S4 and Lexus IS-F. All great cars on their own, but not true sport cars. And definitely not dream car material anyway you look at them.
Curio has already declared that a Z06 or GT-R would mop the floor with both the M3 and 997S in outright performance. So my question is, if he thinks that the measure of a performance car should be based primarily on empirical criteria (as that’s the basis of his discontent with the 911 range), then why doesn’t he apply the same distain towards his M3 and just buy a GT-R and win ALL forum **** matches across the land?
The fact is, a car forum is not the real world and there’s much more to buying and owning a performance car above a certain price range. You could have the pick of the litter. I could have easily purchased a GT-R for what I’ve paid for my 997S, or any M3’s for that matter. On the same note, I could have paid more and get one of the Porsche “GT” models or perhaps an AM. Yet, my choice was clear after considerable seat time in all of the above, in streets as well as track.
5 pages and plenty of other threads on this topic of comparison are absolutely absurd to me. As I have suggested to the OP – if you have to ask opinions from this forum, you’d have to post the same question on an M3 forum as well. Just see how many M3 owners would acquiesce to prefer the 911 for a wide variety of reasons. That would be the most telling.
#78
BMWNA does have input . All dealerships face a BMW contract that ties specific (ultra high) customer serice scores to a variety of perks, mostly revolving around holdback money and access to additional (profitable) allocations of high demand cars.
This is why most dealers go to insane lengths to try and derive perfect 5's from their customers, because that's what's needed for them to get their money and allocations from BMWNA. This puts all the emphasis on perfect scores, and essentially none of it on providing actual good service.
They are not measuring customer satisfaction. They are measuring how good various dealers are at getting customers to say "5" .
This is why most dealers go to insane lengths to try and derive perfect 5's from their customers, because that's what's needed for them to get their money and allocations from BMWNA. This puts all the emphasis on perfect scores, and essentially none of it on providing actual good service.
They are not measuring customer satisfaction. They are measuring how good various dealers are at getting customers to say "5" .
#79
I bought the E46 M3 partly due to practical reasons, price, space. I thought it was a beautiful car. It served me well on the track and during harsh winters. Still miss it.
Got myself a Cayman S, which handled well. It was quite brisk actually, but, had to stick on an aftermarket exhaust to make it sound good. Which it then did on track but droned on regular roads. It became all rattly inside, and I was hearing horror stories where they would suddenly end up with bearing material spread out inside the engine after they would die on track. Maybe I overreacted to that but decided to dump the Cayman (as good as it was, it just felt cheap).
So what to get now? The E92 M3 was ugly (in my opinion). It was big (more like the E39 5 series in size). It was no slouch though. A few suspension tweaks and it really ran fast round the track. Everyone I have ever met who test drove it said it was way better than they thought it would be.
OTOH, I got a kick out of test driving the 996 C4S a few years ago with the X51 (?) package. I have always thought the 997 was a great looker.
With the new 997.2 it seemed major work had been done on the engines. Less likely to have oil starvation issues. I cant stand the PDK because of the button arrangement/ *** backwards "push" to go up a gear. I would have preferred paddles. Don't mind the buttons, but hate the steptronic left over ergonomics. I couldnt stretch to a C2S. But the non-S was close to performance/braking of the outgoing S, so I bought one.
Right now I get the same goosebumps/excitement whenI see my 997 as when I had my E46 M3. The 997 is more a ground up sports car. I have a hard time doing a one is better than the other ......... they are different. I never hated Porsche when I owned BMWs. And I don't hate BMW as I own Porsche. If I wanted all out power, I suppose I could have bought a Z06. Cheaper, great chassis cheaper to maintain. I am sure I could have got past the stereotype attributes given to Corvette owners and would be chasing GT3s on track. There are a lot of factors that make one buy one car over another.
Whenever I see someone else in a car from another make, if it's a car that obviously the owner likes/takes care of, I don't see someone to ridicule, or feel that I am better than them because I own a Porsche. I see another car enthusiast, whether a kid in his Subaru, or tastefully done Honda Civic (I know, I know, but there are a few that aren't over done, and are more driver oriented than bling) or someone in their shiny new RX8 to the somewhat older people in their RS4s.
Anyway, that's my 2 cents.
Last edited by afridi; 05-19-2009 at 08:56 AM.
#80
At least post accurate stuff, didn't the M3's on the previous chassis spank the 911's? They did, then porsche whined and cried, and BMW shut down the program.
Plus, if you think your car has anything in common with the ALMS car, you are dreaming. At least if you had a GT1 block you would have something.
They are both great cars, if the 997S.2 was the better car for me, I would be in it.
Plus, if you think your car has anything in common with the ALMS car, you are dreaming. At least if you had a GT1 block you would have something.
They are both great cars, if the 997S.2 was the better car for me, I would be in it.
You read somewhere in wikipedia that the m3 won some race and Porsche cried. No records show this and I have no info on it. Despite this rant of yours, I'll bite and say "ok". So let's fast forward to today and to the main point: In a race where both Porsche and BMW got a chance to enter their cars recently, who won and who lost:
-ALMS: Porsche spanked BMW in the GT2 class
-24 hours Nurburgring: Porsche spanked BMW
I was at the LBGP and was impressed by the BMW M3; the widebody on the car looks awesome. The fact is, it still lost to Porsche, but it did come 4th (which I think is great for a sedan).
And whether MY own car is related to a GT1 block, yes it is. I own a turbo. There are many of us here on the 997 forum that love the 997 in all its forms (e.g. I won't cry if someone has a faster 335 than my M3).
Lastly, we are all entitled to our opinions. At times you do make sense and but at other times its clear that you're trolling. I am happy that you still love your 3 series and prefer them over Porsche 911's. I'm going to be like you and where a Michael Vick jersey to an SPCA/PETA fundraiser.
I guess you figured we needed some excitement, so you put on your jester hat. We all need to do that at times.
Thanks for the laughs!
#81
Why doesn't a Ferrari guy jump in here and dump on all of us?
#82
#83
#84
That's not customer satisfaction. That's measuring how good various dealers are at getting customers to say "5" on fear of retaliation on their next visit.
#85
Agreed. And to add, no one needs a 911/M3/etc. It boils down to personal preferences...or the intangibles, "x factors".
Curio has already declared that a Z06 or GT-R would mop the floor with both the M3 and 997S in outright performance. So my question is, if he thinks that the measure of a performance car should be based primarily on empirical criteria (as that’s the basis of his discontent with the 911 range), then why doesn’t he apply the same distain towards his M3 and just buy a GT-R and win ALL forum **** matches across the land?
The fact is, a car forum is not the real world and there’s much more to buying and owning a performance car above a certain price range. You could have the pick of the litter. I could have easily purchased a GT-R for what I’ve paid for my 997S, or any M3’s for that matter. On the same note, I could have paid more and get one of the Porsche “GT” models or perhaps an AM. Yet, my choice was clear after considerable seat time in all of the above, in streets as well as track.
5 pages and plenty of other threads on this topic of comparison are absolutely absurd to me. As I have suggested to the OP – if you have to ask opinions from this forum, you’d have to post the same question on an M3 forum as well. Just see how many M3 owners would acquiesce to prefer the 911 for a wide variety of reasons. That would be the most telling.
Curio has already declared that a Z06 or GT-R would mop the floor with both the M3 and 997S in outright performance. So my question is, if he thinks that the measure of a performance car should be based primarily on empirical criteria (as that’s the basis of his discontent with the 911 range), then why doesn’t he apply the same distain towards his M3 and just buy a GT-R and win ALL forum **** matches across the land?
The fact is, a car forum is not the real world and there’s much more to buying and owning a performance car above a certain price range. You could have the pick of the litter. I could have easily purchased a GT-R for what I’ve paid for my 997S, or any M3’s for that matter. On the same note, I could have paid more and get one of the Porsche “GT” models or perhaps an AM. Yet, my choice was clear after considerable seat time in all of the above, in streets as well as track.
5 pages and plenty of other threads on this topic of comparison are absolutely absurd to me. As I have suggested to the OP – if you have to ask opinions from this forum, you’d have to post the same question on an M3 forum as well. Just see how many M3 owners would acquiesce to prefer the 911 for a wide variety of reasons. That would be the most telling.
I did post it in the M section here on 6 speed, but more interested to see what 997 owners have to say since it seems many either have both or have had an M3 in the past and made the jump.....and I already know what to expect out of the BMW for the most part having had 4, not so much with the pcar.
#86
How about reliability of the S cars? I haven't seen any threads of blown motors or burned clutches, although I've seen several used cars with low miles and new clutches. Haven't had much trouble with the E46 M3, but I don't track it. No trouble even with the SMG.
I read that '03 996's were a nightmare with blown engines. All well and good with '05-'07 C2S's??
I read that '03 996's were a nightmare with blown engines. All well and good with '05-'07 C2S's??
#87
Funniest thing is that I find people checking the mileage on the M3 even on the M3 forums. 'Caus the damn thing only gets 13 MPG.
#88
gas mileage not a make it or break it issue at all
if i cared...I'd get a bum *** Prius like half the population where I live...
if i cared...I'd get a bum *** Prius like half the population where I live...
#89
How about reliability of the S cars? I haven't seen any threads of blown motors or burned clutches, although I've seen several used cars with low miles and new clutches. Haven't had much trouble with the E46 M3, but I don't track it. No trouble even with the SMG.
I read that '03 996's were a nightmare with blown engines. All well and good with '05-'07 C2S's??
I read that '03 996's were a nightmare with blown engines. All well and good with '05-'07 C2S's??
#90
I took a ride in a Prius Taxi last week, I would slit my wrists before having to drive a car like that...I know it is a statement towards the environment, but talk about a car that would put me in a Coma!