997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Over rev - help!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-08-2012 | 06:26 PM
kemkc's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 34
From: UK
Rep Power: 15
kemkc is infamous around these parts
Over rev - help!!

Should I be worried by the result of this DME????

I got the DME read on my car and the over revs look like this:

Range 1: 14,445 @1219h
Range 2: 1424 @1219h
Range 3: 100 @ 856h
Range 4: 3 @ 706h
Range 5: 0
Range 6: 0

Current opperating time is 1224h (I hit the limiter at 1219 so that was me) car has 32k miles was bought at 26k miles (one previous careful? Owner)...

Is it even possible to have that few Range 3 and Range 4 over revs or just a logging glitch on the ECU!?

By my calculation Range 3 would have been about 0.25s and range 4 would be 0.008sec....??
 
  #2  
Old 12-08-2012 | 06:31 PM
Alan C.'s Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,445
Rep Power: 99
Alan C. has a reputation beyond reputeAlan C. has a reputation beyond reputeAlan C. has a reputation beyond reputeAlan C. has a reputation beyond reputeAlan C. has a reputation beyond reputeAlan C. has a reputation beyond reputeAlan C. has a reputation beyond reputeAlan C. has a reputation beyond reputeAlan C. has a reputation beyond reputeAlan C. has a reputation beyond reputeAlan C. has a reputation beyond repute
Range 3 would be about 33 revs and 4 would be 1 rev. I wouldn't worry about it.
 
  #3  
Old 12-08-2012 | 07:20 PM
Rotes's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 294
From: NC
Rep Power: 31
Rotes is a splendid one to beholdRotes is a splendid one to beholdRotes is a splendid one to beholdRotes is a splendid one to beholdRotes is a splendid one to beholdRotes is a splendid one to beholdRotes is a splendid one to behold
wow I am not smart enough for this.......
 
  #4  
Old 12-08-2012 | 07:26 PM
chudso's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 148
From: New Orleans
Rep Power: 19
chudso is infamous around these parts
They happened so long ago not a big deal in my opinion.
 
  #5  
Old 12-08-2012 | 07:27 PM
lowbee's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 129
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 18
lowbee is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Rotes
wow I am not smart enough for this.......
hehe, you are not along. Would some one please layout the formula ? Thanks
 
  #6  
Old 12-08-2012 | 09:36 PM
stevefrommn's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 289
From: Minnesota
Rep Power: 31
stevefrommn has a spectacular aura aboutstevefrommn has a spectacular aura aboutstevefrommn has a spectacular aura about
If its still running forget about it!
 
  #7  
Old 12-08-2012 | 09:37 PM
DoninDEN's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,115
From: Denver, CO
Rep Power: 78
DoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond repute
Hi! Here is a thread I posted last year when I bought my 997S. My car had similar over revs and has been a great car over the past year and a half.

dme-over-revs-ranges-3-4-5-reported-ok?

Read through the thread and hopefully it will help you understand the situation. During a stage 4 over rev, there are approximately 400 ignitions per second, so your 3 ignitions in stage 4 is less than 1/100 of a second. (8,000 rpm / 60 seconds x 3 ignitions per revolution = 400 ignitions per second in stage 4).

The 997 has a rev limiter, so the over rev was most likely done in a missed down shift. Very minor and not a sign of abuse. If you do DE's it will be easy have this happen.

If all checks out with the car buy it, drive it (and don't baby it) and most importantly have fun! Post some photos!

Don
 
  #8  
Old 12-08-2012 | 09:59 PM
DoninDEN's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,115
From: Denver, CO
Rep Power: 78
DoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Rotes
wow I am not smart enough for this.......
Originally Posted by lowbee
hehe, you are not along. Would some one please layout the formula ? Thanks
Did that help guys?

Most replies to my thread (that asked the same question) took an emotional approach and told me not to buy the car. Others like Jhbrennan, Northvan and KKMoto took an analytical approach.

Doing the math indicated the over rev was not a sign of abuse. These are race track caliber vehicles and I don't believe an over rev is a sign of abuse. The over rev is just a missed gear where the driver pushed in the clutch as quickly as he realized the bad down shift.
 
  #9  
Old 12-09-2012 | 03:38 AM
kemkc's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 34
From: UK
Rep Power: 15
kemkc is infamous around these parts
Thanks for the reply guys....car has been faultless so far (touch wood).

For me a car to have such few ignitions in a range means that either its a glitch OR the rev limiter just touched that range!? So in this case having 3 ignitions means the there was one revolution. To have one revolution only and register a range 4 the car probably revved to exactly 7,900 revs or 7,901 revs!? Similarly to have only 33 revolutions in range 3 is probably just hitting the rev limiter in sport mode (kicks in between 7,300 and 7,500). Does that make sense?

Initially there was the whole hysteria of IMS failure and then people started talking about cylinder scoring, now both of these topics have died away and one people are talking about over revs as the next paranoid point......it's hard to enjoy ownership sometimes. Basically every time you are out of the car it's paranoia and every time you are in it it's great fun and love! Like being married to a beautiful lady...

What do you guys think?
 
  #10  
Old 12-09-2012 | 04:18 AM
DoninDEN's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,115
From: Denver, CO
Rep Power: 78
DoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by kemkc
Thanks for the reply guys....car has been faultless so far (touch wood).

For me a car to have such few ignitions in a range means that either its a glitch OR the rev limiter just touched that range!? So in this case having 3 ignitions means the there was one revolution. To have one revolution only and register a range 4 the car probably revved to exactly 7,900 revs or 7,901 revs!? Similarly to have only 33 revolutions in range 3 is probably just hitting the rev limiter in sport mode (kicks in between 7,300 and 7,500). Does that make sense?

Initially there was the whole hysteria of IMS failure and then people started talking about cylinder scoring, now both of these topics have died away and one people are talking about over revs as the next paranoid point......it's hard to enjoy ownership sometimes. Basically every time you are out of the car it's paranoia and every time you are in it it's great fun and love! Like being married to a beautiful lady...

What do you guys think?
I picked 8,000 rpm for the stage 4 to make the math easier from this table:

A 997-1 DME records the following rev ranges:
Range 1: 7300-7500 RPM
Range 2: 7500-7700 RPM
Range 3: 7700-7900 RPM
Range 4: 7900-8400 RPM
Range 5: 8400-9500 RPM
Range 6: 9500-11000 RPM

I am amazed that 8,000 rpm the crank is spinning 133 times each second and firing 400 times each second.
 
  #11  
Old 12-09-2012 | 05:37 AM
Dadio's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,342
From: USA
Rep Power: 103
Dadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by kemkc
Should I be worried by the result of this DME????

I got the DME read on my car and the over revs look like this:

Range 1: 14,445 @1219h
Range 2: 1424 @1219h
Range 3: 100 @ 856h
Range 4: 3 @ 706h
Range 5: 0
Range 6: 0

Current opperating time is 1224h (I hit the limiter at 1219 so that was me) car has 32k miles was bought at 26k miles (one previous careful? Owner)...

Is it even possible to have that few Range 3 and Range 4 over revs or just a logging glitch on the ECU!?

By my calculation Range 3 would have been about 0.25s and range 4 would be 0.008sec....??
By your own calculations you have answered the question of relevance. They are not. As for rev limiter, that's what it is there for. Enjoy the car and if you have a catastophic over rev you won't need to ask anyone about it. Think big bang theory, it will be kind of like that only without the stars.
 
  #12  
Old 12-09-2012 | 06:26 AM
cerbomark's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,541
From: upstate, NY
Rep Power: 236
cerbomark Is a GOD !cerbomark Is a GOD !cerbomark Is a GOD !cerbomark Is a GOD !cerbomark Is a GOD !cerbomark Is a GOD !cerbomark Is a GOD !cerbomark Is a GOD !cerbomark Is a GOD !cerbomark Is a GOD !cerbomark Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Dadio
By your own calculations you have answered the question of relevance. They are not. As for rev limiter, that's what it is there for. Enjoy the car and if you have a catastophic over rev you won't need to ask anyone about it. Think big bang theory, it will be kind of like that only without the stars.
I m no expert but I agree if you damage the engine on an over rev situation that you would know about it right away...
As talked about before on this site, I m not sure the rev limiter protects the engine on down shift over rev situations.
 
  #13  
Old 12-09-2012 | 06:59 AM
jhbrennan's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,259
From: Austin
Rep Power: 768
jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by cerbomark
I m no expert but I agree if you damage the engine on an over rev situation that you would know about it right away...
As talked about before on this site, I m not sure the rev limiter protects the engine on down shift over rev situations.
Rev limiter will not protect from a mechanical over-rev (missed shift).
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vividracing
GT3/GT2/GT Vendor Classifieds
1
10-13-2015 02:07 PM
tc264
Automobiles For Sale
2
10-13-2015 11:13 AM
Needsdecaf
Cayenne 958
10
10-12-2015 03:05 AM
007 Vantage
Aston Martin
13
10-08-2015 08:35 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Over rev - help!!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 AM.