998 - Flat 8 Or Not To Flat 8
#17
actually, your stupid vincent, you rather rip a thread than give your opinion on the matter. why leave thoughtless thoughts on this sight, go leave your chump comments on rennlist, I happen to really like 6speedonline, your ruining it, your worthless, later....
#22
Originally Posted by dmoney
actually, your stupid vincent, you rather rip a thread than give your opinion on the matter. why leave thoughtless thoughts on this sight, go leave your chump comments on rennlist, I happen to really like 6speedonline, your ruining it, your worthless, later....
Did you get laughed at on Rennlist as well?
Perhaps you'll get kinder comments if you post this thread on automorons.com or autoidiots.com.
FLat 8 anybody?
#25
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 6 (3 members and 3 guests) TUUNER, gmoney, vincentdds
dmoney and gmoney may have it out for vince...
dmoney and gmoney may have it out for vince...
#28
Originally Posted by mdrums
Keep the 3.8L flat 6, use DFI and use current technology to reduce weight of the overall car. This will not only result in a faster straight line car but also a better handling car in the corners.
And you also forget that the GT3 and GT2 models are getting less hardcore than they used to be to appeal to a bigger crowd. More luxury, nannies etc, they wont be getting much lighter.
That being said it would take some serious engineering to make that V8 light weight and not have an even bigger off bias front to rear. But of course the Chevy 7.0 liter V8 is lighter than the flat 6, so it's possible, but the durability would be in question.
I dont think a 4.0 flat 6 would be reliable enough
Last edited by heavychevy; 08-17-2007 at 10:27 PM.
#29
look vincent next time dont act like a ***** and i wont hurt your feelings, to much...Look all I was doing was asking opinions on this site, you pulled out your guns I just pointed them back at you son. P.S. your rims are really nasty blue kid get a clue blueman....