1970 Cuda Tuned Up at Vivid Racing
#16
That first pic does look quite good, but the 2nd one is exactly what I mean about the rear wheels not fitting right! Both of these vehicles require a staggered wheel size in order to fill the fenders on the cuda because the rear haunches of the car make 17's or 18's look small while the front makes them look large. In order to compensate I see a lot of 20"+ on the rear and IMO they have no place on a cuda. I think the rear wheel arch may actually be higher off the ground than the front, but I'm not sure. The only way to make it look right IMO is with a set of 15" steelies or mag wheels.
As for making a cuda handle, if their short time in Trans-Am tells you anything it's that if you want a pony-car that can turn, you buy a mustang, camaro, or even an AMC... cudas are drag kings.
As for making a cuda handle, if their short time in Trans-Am tells you anything it's that if you want a pony-car that can turn, you buy a mustang, camaro, or even an AMC... cudas are drag kings.
As for handling, I agree - that's why I have a Camaro. I was just saying there are some aftermarket companies out there that make them perform 10x better than the factory. XV Motorsports is one of the best for Mopar.
Cudas are sweet body styles, but man they are expensive over Camaros/Stangs.
#17
This is a very true statement. Every part I buy is 5x more than the same part for a Camaro or Mustang - damn Mopars. But I love them.
#27
what are the specs on your cuda?
#28
440, auto, 3:23 posi, black interior that's in near perfect shape, no rust or related issues anywhere, just a couple of small flaws in the paint (1 hairline crack about 4" long and a couple tiny bubbles by the quarter window). It's not numbers matching - it started life as a 383 Gran Couple car and had a nice drivers restoration in 99, has been driven less than 5k miles since. It's a great car, runs strong and I'd drive it anywhere. Here are more pics:
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/1.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/2.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/3.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/4.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/5.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/6.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/7.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/8.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/9.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/10.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/11.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/12.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/13.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/14.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/15.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/16.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/17.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/18.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/1.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/2.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/3.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/4.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/5.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/6.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/7.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/8.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/9.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/10.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/11.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/12.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/13.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/14.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/15.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/16.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/17.jpg
http://www.hhgn.com/cuda/18.jpg
#30
Pic resized. I'm just not partial to aftermarket wheels on classic cars, I'm a bit of a purist with the muscle cars I own and have owned. I like to believe at one point in history Detroit was creating beautiful, fast cars. But it doesn't matter what wheels and suspension you put on these cars, the handling will always suck, they're meant to go in a straight line and lay rubber the whole way and put a smile on your face.
A 1968 Camaro "Bad Penny" just took out a 911GT3 on R888's (among many others) to take the win in the Optima Ultimate Street Car Challenge as well....
Green Brick
And yeah, it'll still get out in a straight line (Highway)
[link]http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Audi-S4-vs-Plymouth-Green_91168.htm[/link]
Bad Penny
Vid:
[link]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnaScDotkTA[/link]