What's the worst sports car you've ever owned?
#32
Oh, forgot about my 81 X1/9, those engines were good for 40k miles, damn good looking car, but it was poorly engineered. Had it 3 months, drove it off the showroom floor and had to have it towed back, not really sure how long it was actually in my possession, but it was not more than a week or two.
#34
For two weeks it was the 07 V8 Vantage
I bought it new in Palm Desert. Drove it home to Monterey. In that short drive 11 different items either fell off or loosened up. After 40 years of driving Porsches mainly Turbos I thought I had died and gone to car hell.
After a long letter to the then CEO of AM USA they gave me a 5 year unltd mileage warranty. The car was bullet proof after that. Maybe a Friday build?
After a long letter to the then CEO of AM USA they gave me a 5 year unltd mileage warranty. The car was bullet proof after that. Maybe a Friday build?
#35
#38
lol my first car was a 124 sport spider, it was a pos but fun to drive when it was running. i learned everything i know about working on cars with that one.
#39
Being one of the older members of this forum, I have owned a remarkable collection of cars.
Except for the 1997 Suzuki X-90 that I bought as a joke (and to teach my son the skills of a standard transmission) I have never owned a car that couldn't perform as expected.
That list includes:
eleven 911s from 1972 to 2008
Two Boxster Ss
Four Jaguar E-Types
Five vintage Ferraris including two Dinos and a GTC
BMW Z8, 3.0CSi
Alfa Spider-1974
Triumph TR4A and MGB-both better than you might think
Fiat X 1/9: actually this was a terrible car; body flex was unacceptable, paint flaked, etc
Current cars include a new 2015 R8 V8 with MT and of course my new 2014 Volcano Red V8V with MT. Both really perfect for this stage of my life.
I also have a new Macan S and new X5
The Fiat X 1/9 was really a miserable piece of junk
Except for the 1997 Suzuki X-90 that I bought as a joke (and to teach my son the skills of a standard transmission) I have never owned a car that couldn't perform as expected.
That list includes:
eleven 911s from 1972 to 2008
Two Boxster Ss
Four Jaguar E-Types
Five vintage Ferraris including two Dinos and a GTC
BMW Z8, 3.0CSi
Alfa Spider-1974
Triumph TR4A and MGB-both better than you might think
Fiat X 1/9: actually this was a terrible car; body flex was unacceptable, paint flaked, etc
Current cars include a new 2015 R8 V8 with MT and of course my new 2014 Volcano Red V8V with MT. Both really perfect for this stage of my life.
I also have a new Macan S and new X5
The Fiat X 1/9 was really a miserable piece of junk
Last edited by larryg; 05-14-2016 at 05:48 AM.
#40
Being one of the older members of this forum, I have owned a remarkable collection of cars.
Except for the 1997 Suzuki X-90 that I bought as a joke (and to teach my son the skills of a standard transmission) I have never owned a car that couldn't perform as expected.
That list includes:
eleven 911s from 1972 to 2008
Two Boxster Ss
Four Jaguar E-Types
Five vintage Ferraris including two Dinos and a GTC
BMW Z8, 3.0CSi
Alfa Spider-1974
Triumph TR4A and MGB-both better than you might think
Fiat X 1/9: actually this was a terrible car; body flex was unacceptable, paint flaked, etc
Current cars include a new 2015 R8 V8 with MT and of course my new 2014 Volcano Red V8V with MT. Both really perfect for this stage of my life.
I also have a new Macan S and new X5
The Fiat X 1/9 was really a miserable piece of junk
Except for the 1997 Suzuki X-90 that I bought as a joke (and to teach my son the skills of a standard transmission) I have never owned a car that couldn't perform as expected.
That list includes:
eleven 911s from 1972 to 2008
Two Boxster Ss
Four Jaguar E-Types
Five vintage Ferraris including two Dinos and a GTC
BMW Z8, 3.0CSi
Alfa Spider-1974
Triumph TR4A and MGB-both better than you might think
Fiat X 1/9: actually this was a terrible car; body flex was unacceptable, paint flaked, etc
Current cars include a new 2015 R8 V8 with MT and of course my new 2014 Volcano Red V8V with MT. Both really perfect for this stage of my life.
I also have a new Macan S and new X5
The Fiat X 1/9 was really a miserable piece of junk
Ron
Last edited by Ron Avery; 05-14-2016 at 01:43 PM.
#42
I would have to say a '73 Fiat 850 Spyder. I assert that it counts as a sports car because of its roadster layout, it's poor fit with any practical transport need, and, here's the clincher, the fact that mine was the "sport" model, with a rear badge to that effect, and the big motor: 0.9 liters. That's right, nearly a full liter of displacement. It was just a weird, flawed little car, but of course I sort of loved it. We called it the coffee house car, because that was as far as it would go. To the coffee house, then you'd let it rest an hour, then maybe it would go all the way home. We pushed it a lot. Strictly a one zip code car. I got it up to 50 mph once, and it was shuddering so violently I could barely steer it. It had tires narrower than the ones on the motorcycles I've owned. It had a mechanical fuel pump that was driven by a cam on the crankshaft, and which was prone to leaking on these cars, and which was located DIRECTLY ABOVE THE EXHAUST MANIFOLD. Most of these cars died in fires. It weighed 1700 pounds. Note bumpers.
#43
That's classic British Engineering. Cheap, simple, almost works. They used the o-ring axle on the Lotus Elan. Worked fine with limited power output as long as the rubber was pliable.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PorscheEnthusiast
Automobiles For Sale
2
11-13-2015 03:23 PM