Almost there! The last of my GT28RS build being completed by KMD TUNING.....
#17
what turbo's are on this car? What kit? I thought this car had tial 605s? Or are they ATP gt28s? 600hp at 22psi is at the crank I presume.
#18
ATP GT28RS Turbos.... 635 was measured at crank on the Maha 93oct.... Is this Mark BBB? What's up? How u been?
Last edited by str8blst; 01-17-2011 at 10:16 AM.
#22
I don't have any WHP numbers right now but will be sure to get some once the car tuned and build is done. As far as the engine goes it is a totally rebuilt/built. Pauter rods, coated pistons, Cat springs, coated main bearings, balanced crank, built heads (ported/Polished/rs4 intake cams) completely rebuilt block... I'm sure I am missing some other stuff that we did too but that is the major stuff....
Last edited by str8blst; 01-20-2011 at 08:09 AM.
#25
Looks good, sticking with the 2.7L or going larger?
I highly suggest looking into the Tial 770's as opposed to the ATP's, as the Tials on the 2.7 are already showing 630+WHP on 93 and 700+WHP on Race with the same components you have.
Good Luck!
I highly suggest looking into the Tial 770's as opposed to the ATP's, as the Tials on the 2.7 are already showing 630+WHP on 93 and 700+WHP on Race with the same components you have.
Good Luck!
#26
Some more build pics... Got the last piece we needed from Europe late last week so now the engine can be completed... We also tried to hide as much of the ugly wires/piping/tubes as we could...
We should be ready to start her up this week ....
We should be ready to start her up this week ....
Last edited by str8blst; 02-08-2011 at 10:15 AM.
#27
I like the Tial kits for sure but at the time (again well over a year ago) the results were not as conclusive as they are now. Also I wanted to do something a bit different than the OTS kits. If I were to do it all over again I would probably consider the 770 kit or the Agtronic GT28 kit based on the completeness of the packages. It's taken KMD and I a while to put this build together. I am hoping for great results... Not interested in making this the fastest car I have (got a 996TT for that) but want something reliable and quick....
Last edited by str8blst; 02-10-2011 at 01:47 PM.
#30
The motor build (internals) was done over a year ago. We decided to keep the 2.7L after talking with a few friends who had 3.0L with oil consumption issues.
I like the Tial kits for sure but at the time (again well over a year ago) the results were not as conclusive as they are now. Also I wanted to do something a bit different than the OTS kits. If I were to do it all over again I would probably consider the 770 kit based on the completeness of the package. It's taken KMD and I a while to put this build together. I am hoping for great results... Not interested in making this the fastest car I have (got a 996TT for that) but want something reliable and quick....
I like the Tial kits for sure but at the time (again well over a year ago) the results were not as conclusive as they are now. Also I wanted to do something a bit different than the OTS kits. If I were to do it all over again I would probably consider the 770 kit based on the completeness of the package. It's taken KMD and I a while to put this build together. I am hoping for great results... Not interested in making this the fastest car I have (got a 996TT for that) but want something reliable and quick....
First off 3L do not burn oil if built correctly. They actually have a better rod stroke ratio then the stock 2.7L.... And why on earth would you retain small port cylinder heads with all big port intake manifold TB ect? That makes no sense and will hurt your car big time. And ps this is not mark....