Audi S4, S6, RS4, RS6, R8 etc.
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

APR chip for R8 5.2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #31  
Old 08-19-2011 | 12:38 PM
GMP Performance's Avatar
Site Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,060
From: Charlotte, NC
Rep Power: 0
GMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond repute
I am sorry to hear that you are not happy with the software upgrade. Have you done any other upgrades to the car? Did your dealer program the car with the matching octane that is in your gas tank? I can't think of any reason they the 20+ clients that I have sold the software to are happy with their purchase and you are not.

What do you mean when you feel like the turbo kicks in at 3 or 4 thousand since you have an S6 and it is not turbo charged?
 
  #32  
Old 08-19-2011 | 01:04 PM
NA1-T's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 242
From: Earth
Rep Power: 30
NA1-T is infamous around these parts
Hi Matt,

You are correct, cannot explain why it feels like Turbo.
When it reach 3-4 RPM, car vibrate & shoot out.

I am taken the next step now, calling APR directly.
Evan Light
334.502.5181 ext 204

Will keep posted.
 
  #33  
Old 08-19-2011 | 01:29 PM
sakimano's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 136
From: Canada
Rep Power: 22
sakimano is infamous around these partssakimano is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by GMP - Matthew
I am sorry to hear that you are not happy with the software upgrade. Have you done any other upgrades to the car? Did your dealer program the car with the matching octane that is in your gas tank? I can't think of any reason they the 20+ clients that I have sold the software to are happy with their purchase and you are not.

What do you mean when you feel like the turbo kicks in at 3 or 4 thousand since you have an S6 and it is not turbo charged?
language barrier

He's saying that it feels like nothing happens...then a big uneven hit of torque at 3-4k, like a turbo hitting boost.

He's also in Vancouver so I'd submit that he's certainly not suffering from octane defficiency as 91 and 94 are readily available.
 
  #34  
Old 08-19-2011 | 01:36 PM
NA1-T's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 242
From: Earth
Rep Power: 30
NA1-T is infamous around these parts
Just finish talking to Evan, will try the last time, if still not work, then Full Refund.
 
  #35  
Old 08-20-2011 | 11:01 AM
thebishman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 179
From: Overland Park, KS USA
Rep Power: 27
thebishman is a splendid one to beholdthebishman is a splendid one to beholdthebishman is a splendid one to beholdthebishman is a splendid one to beholdthebishman is a splendid one to beholdthebishman is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by sakimano
that's because it's a 1.8 or 2.0 with a K03 turbo, and a boost request change adds 30hp and even more torque

on an R8 5.2 an APR 'chip' (flash) will be nearly imperceptible with the exception of exaggerated throttle, an increased rev limiter, an increased top speed (no limit) and a pile of timing thrown at the car that is mostly corrected back.

There will be very few changes to driving dynamics, and their needing to hire a COMPETITOR to tune their RS4 SC kit is a great example of this. They brought JHM's tuner in to 'fix' their crap tune.

APR RS4 SC with the APR file ran 12.6-12.7 @ 109-110
APR RS4 SC with the JHM file ran 11.8-12.0 @ 115-116

Only thing changed was software. I spoke with JHM's tuner and he made OVER 50 CHANGES to the tune. APR admitted JHM's involvement in their press release after than ran 11.8, but almost as quickly, tried to redact the statement and deny JHM's involvement. Epic fail by APR on integrity as well as tuning.

I think that says a lot about APR's tuning. If there's not a good baseline tune where they can just add boost, they struggle to make power on any car. When they had to build that RS4 SC tune, the car was barely faster than stock (despite a $20,000 kit pricetag)
Your 'impressions' do NOT coincide with the actual driving impressions of R8 V10 owners on R8talk.com where there has been nothing but universal praise for the APR tune.
Bish
 
  #36  
Old 08-20-2011 | 11:26 AM
ENV²'s Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 249
From: NYC
Rep Power: 27
ENV² is a jewel in the roughENV² is a jewel in the roughENV² is a jewel in the rough
My next suggestion was actually to take yourself to an R8 forum and see what they say the best is. seems they like APRs tune over there. But there may be others. I don't know cause I don't own one lol but one day I plan on it
 
  #37  
Old 08-20-2011 | 02:50 PM
Scott1961's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 35
From: Boston
Rep Power: 17
Scott1961 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by thebishman
Your 'impressions' do NOT coincide with the actual driving impressions of R8 V10 owners on R8talk.com where there has been nothing but universal praise for the APR tune.
Bish
Because the R8 V10 is the detuned version of Lambo 560hp motor it was pretty easy for APR to get that power back and they admit that. Before supercharging I did APR 93 octane tune on my R8 V8, Dyno'ed before and after and found gains to be about half what they claimed. APR gains were 12 hp and 7 tq gain at wheels. Still felt for a little less than a $1k the gains were worth it since it also improved the way the car drove. Biggest problem I have with APR is besides my R8 I also did my previous RS4 and they never came out with full program for either of them and I'm sure same is going to happen with the V10. Seems the duel ECU's is giving them problems
 
  #38  
Old 08-20-2011 | 03:30 PM
thebishman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 179
From: Overland Park, KS USA
Rep Power: 27
thebishman is a splendid one to beholdthebishman is a splendid one to beholdthebishman is a splendid one to beholdthebishman is a splendid one to beholdthebishman is a splendid one to beholdthebishman is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by Scott1961
Because the R8 V10 is the detuned version of Lambo 560hp motor it was pretty easy for APR to get that power back and they admit that. Before supercharging I did APR 93 octane tune on my R8 V8, Dyno'ed before and after and found gains to be about half what they claimed. APR gains were 12 hp and 7 tq gain at wheels. Still felt for a little less than a $1k the gains were worth it since it also improved the way the car drove. Biggest problem I have with APR is besides my R8 I also did my previous RS4 and they never came out with full program for either of them and I'm sure same is going to happen with the V10. Seems the duel ECU's is giving them problems
Agree with everything you're saying. I would have to get the 91 octane tune for my R8 V10, and whilst I know that the actual hp/torque gains are pretty small, the increased driveability and torque low down makes it worth while. I also have no doubt that APR won't release the 'full' tune for the R8, and that's a real shame.
Bish
 
  #39  
Old 08-20-2011 | 06:17 PM
Al Pettee's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 349
From: Rochester, New York, USA
Rep Power: 36
Al Pettee is a jewel in the roughAl Pettee is a jewel in the roughAl Pettee is a jewel in the roughAl Pettee is a jewel in the rough
Put out the extra coin and go with MTM or ABT.
 
  #40  
Old 08-22-2011 | 07:59 AM
GMP Performance's Avatar
Site Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,060
From: Charlotte, NC
Rep Power: 0
GMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond repute
My technical support rep is out sick today so my timeline may not be exactly correct, however this is what I was able to fine. I did some research and saw one customer flashing between stock and 91 octane several times. This customer has a naturally aspirated S6, so it's not turbocharged. Our ECU Electrical Engineer tasked with creating the files and hosting them on our server was able to pull up a report of all customers with this specific box code and software revision and noted no other customers have complained. This customer flashed back to stock on the 27th. I believe his dealer alerted us of strange behavior with the customers flash after returning to stock. It's not possible to go into full detail about this strange issue during the flash, but it sounded specific to his particular vehicle and function was changed in case any others exhibited the same behavior in the future.


On 4/7 he flashed the car with 91 Stage I twice in a row.
On 4/16 he went back to stock then back to 91 Stage I again.
On 7/25 he went back to stock.


I'm not sure his dealer was working with us on this issue. It appears they tried flashing it back and forth for diagnosis reasons. Again, my technical support rep is out sick today so I'm unable to ask if he worked on this case. I confirmed the flashing routine was altered on 7/29 so he should be fine if he were to ever get the software again.


I would like mention we do flash several hundred ECU's a day and issues are few and far between. Regardless we keep a log of every single ECU upgrade so we can always look back at the logs if anything strange ever occurs.
 
  #41  
Old 08-22-2011 | 09:05 PM
jmlinmn's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0
jmlinmn is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by ENV²
The guy above with the S6. Aren't you already committed to 93 octane for that motor? I know the min rating is 91 but if it were me I would always do 93. I put 93 only in my /S4
Yep, pretty much.
 
  #42  
Old 08-22-2011 | 09:11 PM
jmlinmn's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0
jmlinmn is infamous around these parts
I'll just throw in that I've got 23k miles on my S6 with a milltek non-resonated exhaust and K&N filters. The APR tune has performed well for me from the first day I had it without issues.
 
  #43  
Old 08-23-2011 | 07:37 AM
GMP Performance's Avatar
Site Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,060
From: Charlotte, NC
Rep Power: 0
GMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Al Pettee
Put out the extra coin and go with MTM or ABT.

There isn't much support for these brands in the US or Canada. Your looking at sending your ECU over seas for ABT and mailing it out to the states at the very least for MTM and they aren't any better than APR. In fact they don't have even 1/4th the global brand recognition that APR has.
 
  #44  
Old 08-29-2011 | 09:24 AM
sakimano's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 136
From: Canada
Rep Power: 22
sakimano is infamous around these partssakimano is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by thebishman
Your 'impressions' do NOT coincide with the actual driving impressions of R8 V10 owners on R8talk.com where there has been nothing but universal praise for the APR tune.
Bish
people who bought the APR tune for the 4.2 S4 and RS4 said the same thing too...'universal praise'. So did people who paid $10,000+ for a PES supercharger on their S4/RS4/R8...'Wow! It really transforms the car! My dyno sheet proves this!'

That is until they performance tested their cars. I'm talking about measuring acceleration.

The guys you want to talk to are the guys who

a) have had it for a few months
b) have other options for making power

Since there are very few R8 5.2 cars running around...even fewer are APR tuned...it's tough to get any long term impressions. Since there are virtually no performance parts that work well on the R8 5.2 other than high dollar forced induction kits, people are 'satisfied' by jumping over a much lower hurdle than they would be if there was a robust market full of great parts.

This happened on every normally aspirated Audi performance car over the past 10 years. It's a broken record.
 



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:23 AM.