2013 Audi S6 clocks 3.7s in 0-60mph
#2
0-60 mph isn't the most important test. Alot of cars launch well, I've seen 300hp EVOs do sub 4 0-60 mph. More important tests are 60-130 mph, 0-124 mph, the 1/4 mile. Those tests are where the real results show and where cars are separated. I mean the GT-R does 0-60 mph in less than 3 seconds and the same as a Veyron but a STOCK GT-R would never compete with a Veyron. Get what I mean? See the 0-130mph which takes 16.1 secs, a Mercedes-Benz E55 does it faster stock. The quarter mile isn't bad it's amazing but the trap speed is a bit off for the E/T, maybe they had a holeshot launch which explains the 0-60 time.
Last edited by e46m3smg; 05-11-2012 at 01:26 PM.
#3
0-60 mph isn't the most important test. Alot of cars launch well, I've seen 300hp EVOs do sub 4 0-60 mph. More important tests are 60-130 mph, 0-124 mph, the 1/4 mile. Those tests are where the real results show and where cars are separated. I mean the GT-R does 0-60 mph in less than 3 seconds and the same as a Veyron but a STOCK GT-R would never compete with a Veyron. Get what I mean? See the 0-130mph which takes 16.1 secs, a Mercedes-Benz E55 does it faster stock. The quarter mile isn't bad it's amazing but the trap speed is a bit off for the E/T, maybe they had a holeshot launch which explains the 0-60 time.
and i think it is also pretty amazing that itīs close to some M5 (F10) numbers, which isn`t supposed to be its direct rival (M5 with 140 more HP):
M5's 5-60 number was 4.6 seconds, S6s is 4.9 seconds. S6's 1/4 mile ET of 12.1 seconds, M5 does it in 12.0 at higher MPH, but also at MUCH higher costs.
so the carīs performance is pretty brilliant imho.
#4
i know what you mean, but itīs 1.5 seconds faster than the previous S6, of course with launch control. still unreal.
and i think it is also pretty amazing that itīs close to some M5 (F10) numbers, which isn`t supposed to be its direct rival (M5 with 140 more HP):
M5's 5-60 number was 4.6 seconds, S6s is 4.9 seconds. S6's 1/4 mile ET of 12.1 seconds, M5 does it in 12.0 at higher MPH, but also at MUCH higher costs.
so the carīs performance is pretty brilliant imho.
and i think it is also pretty amazing that itīs close to some M5 (F10) numbers, which isn`t supposed to be its direct rival (M5 with 140 more HP):
M5's 5-60 number was 4.6 seconds, S6s is 4.9 seconds. S6's 1/4 mile ET of 12.1 seconds, M5 does it in 12.0 at higher MPH, but also at MUCH higher costs.
so the carīs performance is pretty brilliant imho.
#6
and thatīs just the S6, imagine the upcoming RS6
source:
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...s6-test-review
source:
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...s6-test-review
#7
haha, thatīs another +.
i mean the same engine makes a 100HP more (520HP) in the new S8.
it should be easy for the aftermarket to make it even more brutal.
Trending Topics
#8
0-60 mph isn't the most important test. Alot of cars launch well, I've seen 300hp EVOs do sub 4 0-60 mph. More important tests are 60-130 mph, 0-124 mph, the 1/4 mile. Those tests are where the real results show and where cars are separated. I mean the GT-R does 0-60 mph in less than 3 seconds and the same as a Veyron but a STOCK GT-R would never compete with a Veyron. Get what I mean? See the 0-130mph which takes 16.1 secs, a Mercedes-Benz E55 does it faster stock. The quarter mile isn't bad it's amazing but the trap speed is a bit off for the E/T, maybe they had a holeshot launch which explains the 0-60 time.
#9
Absolutely guys it's amazing I didn't mean to discredit the new S6 and that TT V8 will have ALOT of potential when it gets tuned. I just wanted to clarify the 0-60 thing that's all. I loved the old S6 and this looks very nice from the outside. I'm sure it'll be a beast.
#10
I think I found a replacement for my R63
RS6 will probably just have the 520hp+ tune from the S8, so simply getting an S6, and flashing it might just be a close substitute for the Rs6.
I had an '03 RS6 years ago, and had it flashed with GIAC tune - it was a monster! Very very fast, and the AWD was great year round.
RS6 will probably just have the 520hp+ tune from the S8, so simply getting an S6, and flashing it might just be a close substitute for the Rs6.
I had an '03 RS6 years ago, and had it flashed with GIAC tune - it was a monster! Very very fast, and the AWD was great year round.
and thatīs just the S6, imagine the upcoming RS6
source:
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...s6-test-review
source:
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...s6-test-review
#12
As for acceleration I think the gearing is matched very well to achieve those numbers.
#14
I think I found a replacement for my R63
RS6 will probably just have the 520hp+ tune from the S8, so simply getting an S6, and flashing it might just be a close substitute for the Rs6.
I had an '03 RS6 years ago, and had it flashed with GIAC tune - it was a monster! Very very fast, and the AWD was great year round.
RS6 will probably just have the 520hp+ tune from the S8, so simply getting an S6, and flashing it might just be a close substitute for the Rs6.
I had an '03 RS6 years ago, and had it flashed with GIAC tune - it was a monster! Very very fast, and the AWD was great year round.
#15
I think the upcoming RS6 will have at least the same amount of hp as the F10 M5, probably more.