BMW //M Discussion on the BMW M1, BMW M3, BMW M4, BMW M5, and the BMW M6

BMW Announces pricing for the M3 Coupe and Sedan - Official Price: $57,275 / $54,575

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-13-2008 | 07:14 PM
RickyM3's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 404
From: 6SpeedOnline
Rep Power: 36
RickyM3 is infamous around these partsRickyM3 is infamous around these parts
BMW Announces pricing for the M3 Coupe and Sedan - Official Price: $57,275 / $54,575

Official: Pricing for the M3

M3 E92: $57,275

M3 E90: $54,575

BMW ANNOUNCES PRICING FOR THE ALL-NEW BMW M3 COUPE AND SEDAN AT THE 2008 NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL AUTO SHOW IN DETROIT
01/13/2008

Woodcliff Lake, NJ - January 13, 2008... During its press conference today at the 2008 North American International Auto Show in Detroit, BMW announced the pricing for the highly anticipated 2008 M3 Coupe and M3 Sedan. When the vehicles go on sale in March, the Coupe will be priced at $57,275 and the Sedan at $54,575. Sharing the high-revving 414-horsepower V8 and balanced chassis designed to be "faster than its engine," this March, BMW M GmbH will offer the most powerful, best performing series production M3s to the North American market.
The all-new 2008 M3 Coupe and M3 Sedan-the fourth generation of compact sport vehicles which set the standard in minimizing any compromises between race-inspired performance and luxury and convenience-feature the first V8 in a series-production BMW M3. They also feature driver-adjustable settings for crucial dynamic controls encompassing engine response, steering, damping and stability (with an available steering-wheel-mounted "MDrive" button to store the preferences) and a sumptuous interior which can be optimized to the driver's desires including the comprehensive entertainment/navigation system operated through BMW's latest iDrive controller.

Additionally, the 2008 M3 Coupe is the first production vehicle in its segment with a carbon fiber reinforced roof. The material shares the same safety properties as steel, but is four times lighter. Weighing around 11 lbs. less than a standard steel roof and approximately 44 lbs. less than a steel roof incorporating a moonroof, the carbon fiber reinforced roof provides significant weight saving at the highest point of the car-lowering the car's center of gravity-to increase agility and responsiveness while limiting dive and roll in turns.

Racing provided the reason for the original M3's 1986 creation as the company had to produce road-going homologation versions of its 3 Series Coupe to enter the motorsports version in the German Touring Car Championship. The original M3's popularity provided the impetus to continue developing the M3, making it both a better performer and more inviting road car. The M3 has continued to evolve along with the underlying 3 Series, the company's most popular, upon which it is based.

In 1987 North Americans received their first taste of the high-rpm, naturally aspirated 2.3-liter four-cylinder M3 Coupe's 192-hp and thus was born a legend on this side of the Atlantic. The next generation arrived in 1995 with a 3.0-liter (and later, 3.2-liter) 240-hp inline-six powerplant. In 1997 the first M3 Sedan joined the family and the first M3 Convertible followed shortly thereafter. The most-recent version, available from 2001-2006 as either a coupe or convertible, again was offered with six-cylinder power, this time providing 333 hp from its 3.2 liters. This vehicle was BMW's first use of SMG (Sequential Manual Gearbox) for the U.S. market.
 
Attached Files
File Type: doc
2008_m3_coupe_pricing.doc (86.5 KB, 214 views)

Last edited by RickyM3; 01-13-2008 at 07:16 PM.
  #2  
Old 01-13-2008 | 07:26 PM
e92man's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 146
From: florida
Rep Power: 22
e92man is infamous around these parts
eh pricing is ok but with the options i would want (dsg, nav, pdc, ipod, heated seats, 19s wit carbon roof and rear spoiler) it would easily be 70.....
 
  #3  
Old 01-13-2008 | 07:29 PM
Chris G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,893
From: Tampa, FL
Rep Power: 108
Chris G has much to be proud ofChris G has much to be proud ofChris G has much to be proud ofChris G has much to be proud ofChris G has much to be proud ofChris G has much to be proud ofChris G has much to be proud ofChris G has much to be proud ofChris G has much to be proud ofChris G has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by e92man
eh pricing is ok but with the options i would want (dsg, nav, pdc, ipod, heated seats, 19s wit carbon roof and rear spoiler) it would easily be 70.....
Good point, I didn't think that one out as far. Still love the car though.
 
  #4  
Old 01-13-2008 | 09:44 PM
roadking's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 302
Rep Power: 33
roadking is infamous around these parts
Car looks bad *** guys. Just left the show floor. The new M3 will be at the top of a lot lists....

The new X6 was awful... WTF...
 
  #5  
Old 01-13-2008 | 09:56 PM
acs-3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,054
From: Los Angeles
Rep Power: 181
acs-3 has a reputation beyond reputeacs-3 has a reputation beyond reputeacs-3 has a reputation beyond reputeacs-3 has a reputation beyond reputeacs-3 has a reputation beyond reputeacs-3 has a reputation beyond reputeacs-3 has a reputation beyond reputeacs-3 has a reputation beyond reputeacs-3 has a reputation beyond reputeacs-3 has a reputation beyond reputeacs-3 has a reputation beyond repute
Pretty good base price, a lot lower than RS4 and probably lower than C63 also...
 
  #6  
Old 01-13-2008 | 10:54 PM
.bg.'s Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 707
From: Huntsville, AL
Rep Power: 49
.bg. has a spectacular aura about.bg. has a spectacular aura about.bg. has a spectacular aura about
Wow, this isn't nearly what I thought it was going to be.
 
  #7  
Old 01-13-2008 | 11:13 PM
CarbonCycles's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,923
From: Texas
Rep Power: 99
CarbonCycles is a jewel in the roughCarbonCycles is a jewel in the roughCarbonCycles is a jewel in the roughCarbonCycles is a jewel in the rough
not too bad...interesting
 
  #8  
Old 01-13-2008 | 11:21 PM
iLLM3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 16,296
From: SOFLA/NYC
Rep Power: 716
iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by .bg.
Wow, this isn't nearly what I thought it was going to be.
Me either, quite surprised!!! Good , now it makes it a tiny bit more appealing hah!
 
  #9  
Old 01-13-2008 | 11:33 PM
iron chef's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 43
From: nyc 'n norcal
Rep Power: 19
iron chef is infamous around these parts
wow that is real competitive pricing (is-f pricing recently released to be ~56k). will be interesting to see how mb prices the new c63..
 
  #10  
Old 01-14-2008 | 12:00 AM
stuka's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,193
From: Houston
Rep Power: 68
stuka is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by roadking
Car looks bad *** guys. Just left the show floor. The new M3 will be at the top of a lot lists....

The new X6 was awful... WTF...
I have had three M3's, and I have zero interest in this one.

3600 pounds? Why? For what?

Single piston caliper brakes that fades after one session of tracking? Laughable especially since the 135 has better brakes than this sorry car.

The E36 was great because it was nimble, with great handling, and reasonably quick.

The E46 was great because it finally had some power without gaining severe amount of weight.

3600 pounds means that it is no longer a sports sedan, but a GT like everybody else. There is no longer anything special about the M3.

A sad day really. I had hoped that it would come with 400HP in a 3400 pound package like the E46 M3, and this time, with real brakes.

I don't know why anyone would get this sorry car over a nicely kept 2002 996 Turbo 6 speed.
 
  #11  
Old 01-14-2008 | 12:05 AM
eMJay1133's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,258
From: Houston, Tx
Rep Power: 71
eMJay1133 is infamous around these partseMJay1133 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by stuka
I have had three M3's, and I have zero interest in this one.

3600 pounds? Why? For what?

Single piston caliper brakes that fades after one session of tracking? Laughable especially since the 135 has better brakes than this sorry car.

The E36 was great because it was nimble, with great handling, and reasonably quick.

The E46 was great because it finally had some power without gaining severe amount of weight.

3600 pounds means that it is no longer a sports sedan, but a GT like everybody else. There is no longer anything special about the M3.

A sad day really. I had hoped that it would come with 400HP in a 3400 pound package like the E46 M3, and this time, with real brakes.

I don't know why anyone would get this sorry car over a nicely kept 2002 996 Turbo 6 speed.
You took the words right out of my mouth...
 
  #12  
Old 01-14-2008 | 06:01 AM
djantlive's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,788
From: SFBA
Rep Power: 343
djantlive Is a GOD !djantlive Is a GOD !djantlive Is a GOD !djantlive Is a GOD !djantlive Is a GOD !djantlive Is a GOD !djantlive Is a GOD !djantlive Is a GOD !djantlive Is a GOD !djantlive Is a GOD !djantlive Is a GOD !
i think warranty, new car and new design/looks will be the reasons ppl will buy this M3 over a 6 yo 996TT. 996TT isn't exactly light either.

my guess is the new m3 will have a long waiting list and 10-15k markup until summer.
 
  #13  
Old 01-14-2008 | 06:41 AM
iJeremy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,300
From: Standing over a flat-six
Rep Power: 188
iJeremy Is a GOD !iJeremy Is a GOD !iJeremy Is a GOD !iJeremy Is a GOD !iJeremy Is a GOD !iJeremy Is a GOD !iJeremy Is a GOD !iJeremy Is a GOD !iJeremy Is a GOD !iJeremy Is a GOD !iJeremy Is a GOD !


lol... I LOVE a lot of their new models, this isn't one of them.
 

Last edited by iJeremy; 01-14-2008 at 06:44 AM.
  #14  
Old 01-14-2008 | 10:02 AM
GT3Ranger's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,123
From: Miami,FL
Rep Power: 234
GT3Ranger Is a GOD !GT3Ranger Is a GOD !GT3Ranger Is a GOD !GT3Ranger Is a GOD !GT3Ranger Is a GOD !GT3Ranger Is a GOD !GT3Ranger Is a GOD !GT3Ranger Is a GOD !GT3Ranger Is a GOD !GT3Ranger Is a GOD !GT3Ranger Is a GOD !
The new M3 engine is a great high revving piece of work. It is an E60 M5 motor minus 2 cylinders.

The price I'm sure will end up at $70K when its all oner. They need to keep it well below the RS4.

The brakes are a definite disappointment. My gosh 1 piston calipers. The same is true for the M5 ( 2 piston fr. & 1 piston rr.) For this power and weight?

The price of an E46 M3 (2002-06) should come down when the new M3 is out. I'd prefer an E46 M3 w/ an Active Autowerke SC motor and make 550hp for $12K.

Cheers,
GT3Ranger
 
  #15  
Old 01-14-2008 | 12:01 PM
felix55's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 357
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 0
felix55 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by e92man
eh pricing is ok but with the options i would want (dsg, nav, pdc, ipod, heated seats, 19s wit carbon roof and rear spoiler) it would easily be 70.....
Thats true car is bad azz but not worth $70,000 just my 2 cents
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:53 AM.