Taza's 1000HP E46 M3
#47
Originally Posted by gonz996
Yeah, I know - just felt it was "rude". I planned the car out - not to everyones liking I know.
Sorry for the threadjack/drama - Vik's car is a monster!
Sorry for the threadjack/drama - Vik's car is a monster!
#49
Originally Posted by 20C4S
sicko,
seems like i missed u last week. did u do a burn out exiting?
seems like i missed u last week. did u do a burn out exiting?
I'm curious, does the car hook up? I have a friend with a 750rwhp'ish Poopra and the fakker is going sideways in 3rd gear
Here is a video of the speedo (bad quality). You will notice it lose traction in 4th at 100mph (rpms jump to redline). Also notice i let off in every gear, i never even get into my powerband well enough, i shortshift and let off b/c i was frightened. Whats really impressive is the 6th gear pull at 145 and i wasnt even in my powerband!
http://media.putfile.com/Playing-around-in-a-1000HP-M3
#53
Originally Posted by Josh
So how much power does it make on pump fuel (not 100 octane) with a proper SAE corrected dyno?
"SAE corrected to reference conditions of 29.23 InHg (99 kPa) of dry air and 77 F (25°C)..
STD or STP. Another power correction standard determined by the SAE. This standard has been stable for a long time and is widely used in the performance industry. Power is corrected to reference conditions of 29.92 InHg (103.3 kPa) of dry air and 60 F (15.5°C). "
Even without this correction i bet the car will make much more power at a dyno with less humidity and temps. And once the turbo is swapped it will make tons more.
So to answer your question with less politics.
It has never been dyno'd for power with anything less then a 93/100 mix. It made 781rwhp UNCORRECTED on 93/100.
Last edited by SCM3; 05-21-2007 at 02:25 PM.
#54
Originally Posted by SCM3
In other words you want the least power it made right. Proper dyno, that made me laugh, you mean one that wasn't 95 degrees at? You understand if it was SAE the numbers would have been close, UNCORRECTED it peaked at 815rwhp, STD it was 838rwhp, SAE would have been somewhere in the middle. IF STD aint proper then SAE is not proper.
"SAE corrected to reference conditions of 29.23 InHg (99 kPa) of dry air and 77 F (25°C)..
STD or STP. Another power correction standard determined by the SAE. This standard has been stable for a long time and is widely used in the performance industry. Power is corrected to reference conditions of 29.92 InHg (103.3 kPa) of dry air and 60 F (15.5°C). "
Even without this correction i bet the car will make much more power at a dyno with less humidity and temps. And once the turbo is swapped it will make tons more.
So to answer your question with less politics.
It has never been dyno'd for power with anything less then a 93/100 mix. It made 781rwhp UNCORRECTED on 93/100.
"SAE corrected to reference conditions of 29.23 InHg (99 kPa) of dry air and 77 F (25°C)..
STD or STP. Another power correction standard determined by the SAE. This standard has been stable for a long time and is widely used in the performance industry. Power is corrected to reference conditions of 29.92 InHg (103.3 kPa) of dry air and 60 F (15.5°C). "
Even without this correction i bet the car will make much more power at a dyno with less humidity and temps. And once the turbo is swapped it will make tons more.
So to answer your question with less politics.
It has never been dyno'd for power with anything less then a 93/100 mix. It made 781rwhp UNCORRECTED on 93/100.
...
#57
Originally Posted by Christian
Only thing funny is your confrontational attitude
Christian
Christian
I simply laughed at the manner of his question and replied with facts answering the question. Now if the question was serious and he really was interested in numbers rather then throwing jabs, he would have responded differently then a laughing smiley.
My apologies if i had some sort of attitude.