CS versus CTT - Help Please
#16
Thanks for the advice and yeah before I found this forum and started researching a few months back, I would have been happy with a moderately optioned base model and a lot more money in the bank. Ignorance is bliss...dam this forum!
Good point. Certainly don't want to get bitten by the new car bug and get eaten up with a big loss on an early trade in. Must loose a huge chunk of money just driving off the lot. Thanks for the advice. BTW - great postings on your options. Loads of helpful info.
Well said. Don't plan on going to the track anytime soon and not sure if I could take full advantage of the performance that the CTT offers. Then again, it's hard to predict several years down the road.
Great article...thanks.
Don't plan nor have room for another vehicle. But, agreed...if I had or planned on getting a high performance sports car then the CS would surely be the easy to choice.
Thanks DB. Nice to hear your vote for the CS.
Excellent analysis though that's a dangerous way to justify purchases. Brilliant!
I get the sense that once you get used to the Turbo, there is no going back.
Fully agree!
What about resale values between a CS and CTT? One concern I have is that my build for the CS has about $29k in options versus only $13k in options for the CTT (so much more is standard on the CTT and the options that are available on the CTT are significantly less then similar ones on the CS). BOSE, Leather, Air Suspension, Metallic paint, Sports seats are all standard on the CTT but cost $$$ on the CS. Also, wheels and some other options are substantially less on the Turbo. On the Turbo, the sports package which includes PDCC, PTV and sport steering wheel is only $3.5k. On the CS, it would be $3.5k for just the PDCC alone.
I keep reading on this forum that one takes a huge hit on options at resale especially when the vehicle is over optioned. Since my CS build has almost $30k in options would the CTT have a better resale value because the options are substantially less? Of course, I realize that either is a horrible investment but don't want to get completely butchered on resale 5 years down the road.
In looking at older models of the S and Turbo on autotrader, there seems to not be an enormous difference in prices...certainly not the $30k difference on 2011/2012 models. That gives me pause about the turbo but not sure if i am comparing apples vs apples as the new models are quite different.
If you equip an S with the same perfomance options as the Turbo and with the same tires as the Turbo, you should get even better handling than the Turbo has. Better because the S is lighter and, according to Motor Trend, better balanced front to rear (52/48 versus 54/46).
http://www.motortrend.com/oftheyear/...nne/specs.html
http://www.motortrend.com/oftheyear/...nne/specs.html
Don't plan nor have room for another vehicle. But, agreed...if I had or planned on getting a high performance sports car then the CS would surely be the easy to choice.
Fully agree!
What about resale values between a CS and CTT? One concern I have is that my build for the CS has about $29k in options versus only $13k in options for the CTT (so much more is standard on the CTT and the options that are available on the CTT are significantly less then similar ones on the CS). BOSE, Leather, Air Suspension, Metallic paint, Sports seats are all standard on the CTT but cost $$$ on the CS. Also, wheels and some other options are substantially less on the Turbo. On the Turbo, the sports package which includes PDCC, PTV and sport steering wheel is only $3.5k. On the CS, it would be $3.5k for just the PDCC alone.
I keep reading on this forum that one takes a huge hit on options at resale especially when the vehicle is over optioned. Since my CS build has almost $30k in options would the CTT have a better resale value because the options are substantially less? Of course, I realize that either is a horrible investment but don't want to get completely butchered on resale 5 years down the road.
In looking at older models of the S and Turbo on autotrader, there seems to not be an enormous difference in prices...certainly not the $30k difference on 2011/2012 models. That gives me pause about the turbo but not sure if i am comparing apples vs apples as the new models are quite different.
#17
Link:
http://www.porsche.com/usa/pre-owned-vehicles/search/
There is about a $20K difference between last gen CS and CTT. Not exactly $30K, but enough to be appreciable for sure.
#18
Well, I have an 09 GTS and I'm very happy with it. With a few mods you can have 450hp (bypass pipes, intake, exhaust, ECU and SprintBooster) and it will handle great and have reasonable performance. I don't have a TT but even the TT will not be super quick and nimble. This is an SUV after all (albeit an incredibly performing SUV). I have 2 other cars that satisfy my "need for speed" so I wanted my daily driver to do everything well (handle well, look good, sound good, and be able to carry me and my companions in comfort in any weather, etc.) so I'm now on my second Cayenne (had an 04 CS and now an 09 GTS). But thats just me and my opinion based upon my wants and desires. To each his own. Get whichever you prefer. Life is short so enjoy it while you can. I drive my other cars hard and enjoy them (rather than store them so the next owner can have a low mileage, pristine hand me down). Next time I might step up to the TT.
There is a video of a guy tracking the new CTT against a C4S/PDK and the C4S only beat it by 1.2 seconds.
Also anyone (including myself) who has driven a previous model Cayenne will say the new model is much more nimble then the previous. Not just because of the 400lb weight loss but because of the PTV which I think the GTS could only have the PDCC at best. And yes the CS is even more nimble/lighter then the CTT but not by much and certainly not enough to overcome the lack of power.
And on a final note, after attending the porsche driving school in Feb we did a certain autocross using the new (super handling) boxster spyder. Then later on we did the same autocross with the CTT and everyone had their jaws on the floor in amazment. Yes, it is that much better!!!!
#19
Good big fast thread.
The OP started with a wish for a base model, lightly optioned (hardly possible after hanging around here).
Mikesea: What is your current ride and in the recent past? That may well determine joy or regret with the CS.
HRD RE: Handling and weight distribution- My feelings exactly. I have never seen a skidpad rating for a CS with PTV and PDCC. The CTT so equipped pulled 95g, the CS without 91.
zzzspeed - I do not know anyone (including me) who has a much above 50K vehicle, so consider myself very fortunate indeed to have a CS on order. I agree that they are a bargain in any model level- can't believe I just said that
Mteddylee, re: $16 day difference. Very relative.
Jace- A man with a consistently positive point of view when it comes to cars and options. Thank you.
Paul W. Re: Driving Hard and putting on the (s)miles before handing off to next owner: Excellent and appreciated advice.
Probably because I never owned- never even drove- a Porsche, I somehow expected the CS to be larger than life- delivering the road feel and thrust of fun cars like the EVO and Dinan M3. It does not.
I cannot consider a CTT so like an honest poster below, have chosen ignorance. I do know the CS is light years ahead in performance and luxury of any family hauler I have ever owned.
My driving impression was that in sport trim (PTV/PDCC) the CS carved corners beyond anything you'd expect in an SUV. But if you need/want/can afford the thrust, CTT.
Sorry I don't have the quote thing down yet
The OP started with a wish for a base model, lightly optioned (hardly possible after hanging around here).
Mikesea: What is your current ride and in the recent past? That may well determine joy or regret with the CS.
HRD RE: Handling and weight distribution- My feelings exactly. I have never seen a skidpad rating for a CS with PTV and PDCC. The CTT so equipped pulled 95g, the CS without 91.
zzzspeed - I do not know anyone (including me) who has a much above 50K vehicle, so consider myself very fortunate indeed to have a CS on order. I agree that they are a bargain in any model level- can't believe I just said that
Mteddylee, re: $16 day difference. Very relative.
Jace- A man with a consistently positive point of view when it comes to cars and options. Thank you.
Paul W. Re: Driving Hard and putting on the (s)miles before handing off to next owner: Excellent and appreciated advice.
Probably because I never owned- never even drove- a Porsche, I somehow expected the CS to be larger than life- delivering the road feel and thrust of fun cars like the EVO and Dinan M3. It does not.
I cannot consider a CTT so like an honest poster below, have chosen ignorance. I do know the CS is light years ahead in performance and luxury of any family hauler I have ever owned.
My driving impression was that in sport trim (PTV/PDCC) the CS carved corners beyond anything you'd expect in an SUV. But if you need/want/can afford the thrust, CTT.
Sorry I don't have the quote thing down yet
#20
Fully agree!
What about resale values between a CS and CTT? One concern I have is that my build for the CS has about $29k in options versus only $13k in options for the CTT (so much more is standard on the CTT and the options that are available on the CTT are significantly less then similar ones on the CS). BOSE, Leather, Air Suspension, Metallic paint, Sports seats are all standard on the CTT but cost $$$ on the CS. Also, wheels and some other options are substantially less on the Turbo. On the Turbo, the sports package which includes PDCC, PTV and sport steering wheel is only $3.5k. On the CS, it would be $3.5k for just the PDCC alone.
I keep reading on this forum that one takes a huge hit on options at resale especially when the vehicle is over optioned. Since my CS build has almost $30k in options would the CTT have a better resale value because the options are substantially less? Of course, I realize that either is a horrible investment but don't want to get completely butchered on resale 5 years down the road.
In looking at older models of the S and Turbo on autotrader, there seems to not be an enormous difference in prices...certainly not the $30k difference on 2011/2012 models. That gives me pause about the turbo but not sure if i am comparing apples vs apples as the new models are quite different.
I did read that this will be your only car and if that's the case my vote would go to the Turbo .
However .. 2012/13 is also supposed to launch a Turbo S . That is the car to get unless you just can't wait .
#21
I keep reading on this forum that one takes a huge hit on options at resale especially when the vehicle is over optioned. Since my CS build has almost $30k in options would the CTT have a better resale value because the options are substantially less? Of course, I realize that either is a horrible investment but don't want to get completely butchered on resale 5 years down the road.
On the other hand, I think there are valid concerns about the resale value of a Turbo compared to an S. Because potential buyers have more money to sink into their purchase than buyers looking for a Cayenne S or a Cayenne V6, they have a lot more options and so can easily skip over a Turbo that's for sale for one that has an option they really want, or is new, or is a CPO, or is a new Turbo S or a used Turbo S, etc. Compare that to trying to sell a Cayenne V6 you bought for 60K and offer for sale some day. Then, you would have a large market of customers with hard limits of 30K or 35K or 40K who can't spend more than that no matter how much they wish they could. The Cayenne S would, of course, fall somewhere in between these two extremes.
For lots of reasons, namely bundled-in options I don't want, nimbler handling, the difference in looks between the air intake grills, lower initial price, and the powerkit soon bringing the price difference to more like 45K, I'd rather buy an S. I bought my current car nine years ago this month and had the previous one, a phoenix red 1990 Acura Legend coupe for ten years, so there's a really good chance resale value will never be much of an issue.
The Acura had a 161-horsepower V6 engine that never left me wanting for more. The S has 2 1/2 times that. For the kind of driving I do around here, there's just no way I need 100 more horsepower than the S.
http://zfclubsport.files.wordpress.c...ura_legend.jpg
In looking at older models of the S and Turbo on autotrader, there seems to not be an enormous difference in prices...certainly not the $30k difference on 2011/2012 models. That gives me pause about the turbo but not sure if i am comparing apples vs apples as the new models are quite different.
http://www.internetautoguide.com/3-1...e-cayenne.html
Like the 2011, there's a wide price difference between the different models.
#23
Congratulations!
#26
Nothing really to worry about that you can't option for if you build.
the only things that in time will come as changes are the refresh, and the turbo S.
Even with the turbo S, you can buy the power kit though and make it equal there again. Larger breaks can always be purchased, and even body refreshes can me modified to older cars.
I never wait if you want something now. Enjoy it now when those that are waiting can't, then later do some of the refresh mods and have a new looking Cayenne, or just trade in for a new one at that time.
#27
Jace-
Kinda off topic, but would you comment on the benefits of PCCB on a CTT? You can PM me if you would like. I love the yellow calipers and less brake dust, but >$8,000 for less brake dust and a $400 paint job...Will I notice the extra $8000 on the car.
Kinda off topic, but would you comment on the benefits of PCCB on a CTT? You can PM me if you would like. I love the yellow calipers and less brake dust, but >$8,000 for less brake dust and a $400 paint job...Will I notice the extra $8000 on the car.
#28
These brakes added by Porsche at a later date are approx. $20k just in parts.
If you track your car, which I never will, but ceramics are superior in that category as well, no break fade at all! The first brake punch is a bit soft but after that all is great!
#29
For me, the choice was clear, CS, not like we intended to use Cayenne to race around.
The look of the CTT front end is much better than CS, but CS is fast enough for our usage and strong enough to haul stuff around.
The look of the CTT front end is much better than CS, but CS is fast enough for our usage and strong enough to haul stuff around.
Last edited by pcst; 05-19-2011 at 01:11 PM.