Cayenne 955/957 Porsche's SUV up to 2011. Cayenne, Cayenne S, and Cayenne Turbo message forum.

Mercedes ML 63 AMG vs. Cayenne turbo S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 09-02-2006 | 11:01 PM
Cognac's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,717
From: Honolulu, HI
Rep Power: 106
Cognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by Vladcanada
I test drove one and let me tell you pictures dont do justice not even close in person it just soooooooo hot! And the power is crazy for an SUV ( and its coming from me who had 05 E55 before) Handles well but i didnt had enough time in it to test it "right" overall im SOLD and getting one!
Congrat!!!! must be a beast.
My mind is still with cayenne...
 
  #17  
Old 09-04-2006 | 05:42 AM
20C4S's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,576
From: Los Angeles, CA
Rep Power: 681
20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Cognac
My mind is still with cayenne...
my thought as well. i sat in the ML63 today but wasn't impressed with the look. on the other hand, the E63 is pretty sweet...
 
  #18  
Old 09-04-2006 | 06:07 AM
Cognac's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,717
From: Honolulu, HI
Rep Power: 106
Cognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant future

mr. arling! do i hear 997GT3RS?
name is getting longer...insane...per letter cost should be more than civic...
 
  #19  
Old 09-04-2006 | 06:17 AM
20C4S's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,576
From: Los Angeles, CA
Rep Power: 681
20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute20C4S has a reputation beyond repute
it's not about the car in the future. it's the car for tomorrow. in fact, i need a car like yesterday... lots happening in between the RS.
 
  #20  
Old 09-04-2006 | 06:55 AM
Cognac's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,717
From: Honolulu, HI
Rep Power: 106
Cognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant future
you have the point mr. arling.

however, when i sit in the car i look for more of function (like pasm, power kit(TT ) ...in cayenne) than idrive or whatever...
comfort is nice but wouldn't mind to trade something with better performance.
my option was limited...gotta do grocery shop 3 times a week
other brands offer good performance with comfort but when it comes down to finishing touch....IMO, nobody can't beat porsche.
well, i hope you find something you can enjoy for 3months?
hope it last more....
 
  #21  
Old 09-04-2006 | 11:35 AM
Joeskie's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,661
From: Montreal
Rep Power: 128
Joeskie is a jewel in the roughJoeskie is a jewel in the roughJoeskie is a jewel in the roughJoeskie is a jewel in the rough
Even if the ml has advantages performance wise - Don't forget the cayenne came out almost 4 years ago...Imagine we were comparing the CTT to the old ML55...
 
  #22  
Old 09-05-2006 | 09:25 PM
mudman2's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 299
From: Bucks County, PA
Rep Power: 32
mudman2 is infamous around these parts
yawn, the style is just so very boring
 
  #23  
Old 09-06-2006 | 12:24 PM
hamada's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 22
From: Canada
Rep Power: 0
hamada is infamous around these parts
if i had a choice to do it all over id go for the ctts
ml, u gots ta be kidding...
maybe if they made a sporty 'g' id consider,
 
  #24  
Old 09-09-2006 | 12:20 AM
VBOXKING's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 405
From: Brentwood, TN
Rep Power: 47
VBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud of
Today I ripped a 0-60 mph in 4.6 seconds in my Cayenne Turbo S, so I wouldnt say the ML63 is faster based on one review. I used my Driftbox which is from the same company that makes the Vbox and it's just as accurate. It uses the same GPS technology as the Vbox.

http://www.caranddriver.com/features...-driftbox.html

When making this run I have PSM off, suspension set to sport and lowered 1 setting, A/C completely off, windows closed. Weather was 85 degrees, mild humidity. Run was done on a desterted flat level black top surface.

Car has 2600 miles on it. (it really has come alive since it was brand new, which is probably why some mags might not get as good of acceleration results). Car had very little gas in it, maybe 2-3 gallons.

Launch was done by power braking up to 2900 RPMs and letting her rip. I got slight rear wheel chirp as the front wheels gripped and the car just flew off the line.

I love this car!!
 
  #25  
Old 09-09-2006 | 12:33 AM
Cognac's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,717
From: Honolulu, HI
Rep Power: 106
Cognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant futureCognac has a brilliant future
Are you sure you were driving Cayenne Turbo S?
impressed with result.

considering GIAC flash? I bet you will be knocked out with your own result!
 
  #26  
Old 09-09-2006 | 09:58 AM
VBOXKING's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 405
From: Brentwood, TN
Rep Power: 47
VBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by Cognac
Are you sure you were driving Cayenne Turbo S?
impressed with result.

considering GIAC flash? I bet you will be knocked out with your own result!
Yes I am sure, lol.

I didnt realize there was a GIAC flash for the Turbo S.
 
  #27  
Old 09-09-2006 | 11:14 AM
pilone's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,493
From: Pescara, Italy
Rep Power: 162
pilone is just really nicepilone is just really nicepilone is just really nicepilone is just really nicepilone is just really nice
Originally Posted by acicchelli
Today I ripped a 0-60 mph in 4.6 seconds in my Cayenne Turbo S, so I wouldnt say the ML63 is faster based on one review. I used my Driftbox which is from the same company that makes the Vbox and it's just as accurate. It uses the same GPS technology as the Vbox.

http://www.caranddriver.com/features...-driftbox.html

When making this run I have PSM off, suspension set to sport and lowered 1 setting, A/C completely off, windows closed. Weather was 85 degrees, mild humidity. Run was done on a desterted flat level black top surface.

Car has 2600 miles on it. (it really has come alive since it was brand new, which is probably why some mags might not get as good of acceleration results). Car had very little gas in it, maybe 2-3 gallons.

Launch was done by power braking up to 2900 RPMs and letting her rip. I got slight rear wheel chirp as the front wheels gripped and the car just flew off the line.

I love this car!!
That a great news Mr. Cicchelli!
4.6 secs is really exceptional...so the Cayenne hits again...yeaaaaaah
 
  #28  
Old 09-09-2006 | 10:56 PM
Vladcanada's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 542
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 45
Vladcanada is a glorious beacon of lightVladcanada is a glorious beacon of lightVladcanada is a glorious beacon of lightVladcanada is a glorious beacon of lightVladcanada is a glorious beacon of light
I wouldnt trust those driftboxes at all, but i would love to see your dragstrip times!
 
  #29  
Old 09-10-2006 | 12:48 AM
VBOXKING's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 405
From: Brentwood, TN
Rep Power: 47
VBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud ofVBOXKING has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by Vladcanada
I wouldnt trust those driftboxes at all, but i would love to see your dragstrip times!
No dragstrips around here. Just because you dont trust the driftbox times doesnt make them any less accurate. I knew when I posted at least one skeptic would make a negative comment.

I think Car and Driver summed it up well and I think I will take their findings as well as my own over yours: (oh wait you dont have any!)

"To ensure that the data from the DriftBox were accurate, we checked them against our $9999 Racelogic VBOX equipment that we regularly use when testing cars. Long ago we confirmed the VBOX’s accuracy before we trusted it as the measure of our performance tests. The DriftBox is built with the same technology. Over several weeks of testing new cars, we attached the DriftBox adjacent to the VBOX. Without exception, the DriftBox read dead-on with the VBOX. However, since the DriftBox lacks a brake switch — used to measure braking performance — and the VBOX software is more suited to our uses, we’ll continue to rely on the VBOX."
 
  #30  
Old 09-11-2006 | 01:50 AM
Vladcanada's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 542
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 45
Vladcanada is a glorious beacon of lightVladcanada is a glorious beacon of lightVladcanada is a glorious beacon of lightVladcanada is a glorious beacon of lightVladcanada is a glorious beacon of light
Originally Posted by acicchelli
No dragstrips around here. Just because you dont trust the driftbox times doesnt make them any less accurate. I knew when I posted at least one skeptic would make a negative comment.

I think Car and Driver summed it up well and I think I will take their findings as well as my own over yours: (oh wait you dont have any!)

"To ensure that the data from the DriftBox were accurate, we checked them against our $9999 Racelogic VBOX equipment that we regularly use when testing cars. Long ago we confirmed the VBOX’s accuracy before we trusted it as the measure of our performance tests. The DriftBox is built with the same technology. Over several weeks of testing new cars, we attached the DriftBox adjacent to the VBOX. Without exception, the DriftBox read dead-on with the VBOX. However, since the DriftBox lacks a brake switch — used to measure braking performance — and the VBOX software is more suited to our uses, we’ll continue to rely on the VBOX."
post a picture of your cyenne S!
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 PM.