Mercedes ML 63 AMG vs. Cayenne turbo S
#32
09-11-2006 | 03:07 AM
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,154
From: So. CA
Rep Power: 118
It seems the 63 is posting some disappointing performance results. So, far we have only seen a e63 run a 13.08 sec 1/4 at 108mph. Compared to the 55's low 12's at 118 and the M5's high 12 low 13 1/4. I think Mercedes made a big mistake by going to a NA motor. It's unfortunate the new ML did not get the 55k.
Last edited by L8Apex; 09-11-2006 at 03:10 AM.
#33
09-11-2006 | 03:16 AM
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,576
From: Los Angeles, CA
Rep Power: 681
it's against natural to run a SUV for those numbers. i sorta agree, Rob. i'm not sure it's a good idea to run the 63 motor in the ML/SUV while the beauty is the top-end. why would someone driving a truck @ higher rpm all the time.
#34
09-11-2006 | 12:28 PM
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 405
From: Brentwood, TN
Rep Power: 47
Originally Posted by Vladcanada
post a picture of your cyenne S!
http://www.perenold.com/gallery/main...&g2_itemId=198
#35
09-11-2006 | 01:12 PM
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 542
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 45
Originally Posted by 20C4S
it's against natural to run a SUV for those numbers. i sorta agree, Rob. i'm not sure it's a good idea to run the 63 motor in the ML/SUV while the beauty is the top-end. why would someone driving a truck @ higher rpm all the time.
rummroll: for the whole 2 seconds.
#37
09-12-2006 | 12:50 PM
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 163
From: Gilbert
Rep Power: 30
Originally Posted by acicchelli
Today I ripped a 0-60 mph in 4.6 seconds in my Cayenne Turbo S, so I wouldnt say the ML63 is faster based on one review. I used my Driftbox which is from the same company that makes the Vbox and it's just as accurate. It uses the same GPS technology as the Vbox.
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...-driftbox.html
When making this run I have PSM off, suspension set to sport and lowered 1 setting, A/C completely off, windows closed. Weather was 85 degrees, mild humidity. Run was done on a desterted flat level black top surface.
Car has 2600 miles on it. (it really has come alive since it was brand new, which is probably why some mags might not get as good of acceleration results). Car had very little gas in it, maybe 2-3 gallons.
Launch was done by power braking up to 2900 RPMs and letting her rip. I got slight rear wheel chirp as the front wheels gripped and the car just flew off the line.
I love this car!!
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...-driftbox.html
When making this run I have PSM off, suspension set to sport and lowered 1 setting, A/C completely off, windows closed. Weather was 85 degrees, mild humidity. Run was done on a desterted flat level black top surface.
Car has 2600 miles on it. (it really has come alive since it was brand new, which is probably why some mags might not get as good of acceleration results). Car had very little gas in it, maybe 2-3 gallons.
Launch was done by power braking up to 2900 RPMs and letting her rip. I got slight rear wheel chirp as the front wheels gripped and the car just flew off the line.
I love this car!!
#38
09-12-2006 | 01:04 PM
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 405
From: Brentwood, TN
Rep Power: 47
My 2004 Turbo did that to me as well. But I was able to successfully do a power brake launch with it most of the time. I found that the longer you take to do the launch while power braking the more chance you have of it going into that safe mode. I suggest launching within 5 seconds of revving while the brake is held. I am not sure they have changed this, I probaby just launch fast enough so it hasnt happened to me in my 2006 yet.
#39
09-12-2006 | 01:28 PM
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 542
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 45
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYVOMdFNF_c
ml63 is pretty fast! I really wish it can do sub 13 sec in 1/4 that would be awesome!
ml63 is pretty fast! I really wish it can do sub 13 sec in 1/4 that would be awesome!
#40
09-12-2006 | 10:46 PM
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,957
From: Texas
Rep Power: 455
Originally Posted by acicchelli
My 2004 Turbo did that to me as well. But I was able to successfully do a power brake launch with it most of the time. I found that the longer you take to do the launch while power braking the more chance you have of it going into that safe mode. I suggest launching within 5 seconds of revving while the brake is held. I am not sure they have changed this, I probaby just launch fast enough so it hasnt happened to me in my 2006 yet.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Armytrix_F1_Exhaust
Mercedes / AMG
12
07-08-2019 12:31 AM
PelicanParts.com
Cayenne 955/957 Vendor Classifieds
0
08-20-2015 04:00 PM
PelicanParts.com
Cayenne 958 Vendor Classifieds
0
08-20-2015 03:59 PM
PelicanParts.com
Cayenne Turbo Vendor Classifieds
0
08-20-2015 03:57 PM
