Diesel: Oil change DIY
#62
Thanks for posting this info
gnat,
Thanks for posting this procedure. My dealer uses the drain plug method fortunately. I got sucked into the Porsche Maintenance plan for three years which gives a slight discount compared to the single purchase price of OC.
I bought a VW dipstick which requires minor trimming of the handle to clear the engine cover. Now if I can only get the dealer tech to use it to save time.
Here is the dipstick P/N I used:
http://www.planet-9.com/gallery/show...?i=35671&c=689
Here is a shot showing the trimmed dipstick in place:
http://www.planet-9.com/gallery/show...?i=35672&c=683
My dealer uses a metal vacuum canister to suck up the water from the bottom of the fuel filter housing. I had asked them to tell me how much water came out but with this tool they can't.
Rob
Thanks for posting this procedure. My dealer uses the drain plug method fortunately. I got sucked into the Porsche Maintenance plan for three years which gives a slight discount compared to the single purchase price of OC.
I bought a VW dipstick which requires minor trimming of the handle to clear the engine cover. Now if I can only get the dealer tech to use it to save time.
Here is the dipstick P/N I used:
http://www.planet-9.com/gallery/show...?i=35671&c=689
Here is a shot showing the trimmed dipstick in place:
http://www.planet-9.com/gallery/show...?i=35672&c=683
My dealer uses a metal vacuum canister to suck up the water from the bottom of the fuel filter housing. I had asked them to tell me how much water came out but with this tool they can't.
Rob
Last edited by Rob VN; 09-05-2015 at 10:09 AM.
#63
I've drained water twice now and there was no appreciable water either time. This doesn't surprise me though for two reasons. The first is that the fuel is much cleaner now than it used to be, though less clean stuff is still available and you just never know. The second is the screwed up system/procedure Porsche has.
Diesel floats on water, so the water will collect at the bottom of the housing. The T-Reg and Q7 have a drain at the bottom of the housing that you just open until you get fuel. Porsche doesn't and the filter has to be removed, but as soon as you do the two liquids get mixed again. So unless you let it sit for a few hours after removing the filter or drain the entire housing, you actually aren't going to get significant water out
#64
Would Toureg or Q7 Filter filter/drain fit in Cayenne?
gnat,
Would the Toureg or Q7 filter fit in the Cayenne? I would be up for that upgrade since it would make things so much easier over the life of the car.
I'm used to taking care of my boat diesel which has a drain.
Would the Toureg or Q7 filter fit in the Cayenne? I would be up for that upgrade since it would make things so much easier over the life of the car.
I'm used to taking care of my boat diesel which has a drain.
#65
I'm sure they had a good reason, but it sure ended up being a stupid design in my opinion. On top of the drain issues, it's also sitting right around and over things that really don't take kindly to getting covered in diesel fuel...
#66
[*]Wipe off the bottom of the oil pan and replace the drain plug. Torque to 23nm. EDIT: According to the "WM 1001IN Tightening torques for engine" document the actual value should be 22nm.
Thanks.
b-man
#67
Originally Posted by b-man
Can someone please double check the oil drain plug torque recommendation above? It says 22 or 23nm. But I have seen others say it should be more like 22 or 23 ft-lbs.
Thanks.
b-man
Thanks.
b-man
It doesn't say 22 or 23nm. It says 22nm. The reference to 23 was from the linked post about how i initially derived the 23nm value as my dealer refused to give me the spec.
The actual value as taken from the listed PIWIS document is 22nm. That is the spec directly from Porsche.
#68
I think they are actually the same filter, but with different part numbers. I do know that the aftermarket Mahle oil filter I bought was spec'd for both cars, even though the reference showed different OEM part numbers for them.
Anyway, just did the oil change myself for the first time. Took about 40 minutes total. I found with the air supsension on offroad high level and 2" ramps, I didn't even need to jack the truck up to get under.
I would like a fomoto though.
Anyway, just did the oil change myself for the first time. Took about 40 minutes total. I found with the air supsension on offroad high level and 2" ramps, I didn't even need to jack the truck up to get under.
I would like a fomoto though.
#70
Sorry for the late reply, I don't logon here at work and forget to check at night...
It doesn't say 22 or 23nm. It says 22nm. The reference to 23 was from the linked post about how i initially derived the 23nm value as my dealer refused to give me the spec.
The actual value as taken from the listed PIWIS document is 22nm. That is the spec directly from Porsche.
It doesn't say 22 or 23nm. It says 22nm. The reference to 23 was from the linked post about how i initially derived the 23nm value as my dealer refused to give me the spec.
The actual value as taken from the listed PIWIS document is 22nm. That is the spec directly from Porsche.
I ended up tightening my drain plug to 22 ft-lbs (not 22 nm). This is for my 2016 Cayenne Diesel (3.0 V6).
The main reason is that from what I saw, the same engine in a VW has a drain plug which is size M14x1.5 (just like my CD, which I measured to confirm). The VW drain plug is supposed to be tightened to "30 nm" (which is 22 ft-lbs).
22 ft-lbs also seems to make sense for the size and material.
b-man
#71
The 22nm value was taken directly from PIWIS/TSI which means it is the official spec from Porsche. 22nm is roughly 16 ft-lbs which means you've torqued it to almost half again the spec at roughly 30nm.
While they are the same basic motor there are some differences, including the oil pan and oil filter. While in many cases the values and procedures are probably the same, it is not safe to assume. A Porsche Tech or PIWIS/TSI should be consulted for the proper procedures and are the only valid source of record.
Not only have your risked damaging your oil pan, you've also given PCNA a foothold to deny warranty service on the motor if they discovered it (e.g. they can show you did not follow the approved procedures). In all likelihood you aren't going to have either issue, but it's not worth the risk when the correct information is available.
I had to guess at my first attempt as no one had yet documented it, I didn't know I could get access to PIWIS, and my dealer flat lied to me (claiming no spec existed). Even still my derived value was only 1nm (0.7 ft-lb) over the spec.
#72
You have over tightened your drain plug and I hope no one takes your "advice" here.
The 22nm value was taken directly from PIWIS/TSI which means it is the official spec from Porsche. 22nm is roughly 16 ft-lbs which means you've torqued it to almost half again the spec at roughly 30nm.
While they are the same basic motor there are some differences, including the oil pan and oil filter. While in many cases the values and procedures are probably the same, it is not safe to assume. A Porsche Tech or PIWIS/TSI should be consulted for the proper procedures and are the only valid source of record.
Not only have your risked damaging your oil pan, you've also given PCNA a foothold to deny warranty service on the motor if they discovered it (e.g. they can show you did not follow the approved procedures). In all likelihood you aren't going to have either issue, but it's not worth the risk when the correct information is available.
I had to guess at my first attempt as no one had yet documented it, I didn't know I could get access to PIWIS, and my dealer flat lied to me (claiming no spec existed). Even still my derived value was only 1nm (0.7 ft-lb) over the spec.
The 22nm value was taken directly from PIWIS/TSI which means it is the official spec from Porsche. 22nm is roughly 16 ft-lbs which means you've torqued it to almost half again the spec at roughly 30nm.
While they are the same basic motor there are some differences, including the oil pan and oil filter. While in many cases the values and procedures are probably the same, it is not safe to assume. A Porsche Tech or PIWIS/TSI should be consulted for the proper procedures and are the only valid source of record.
Not only have your risked damaging your oil pan, you've also given PCNA a foothold to deny warranty service on the motor if they discovered it (e.g. they can show you did not follow the approved procedures). In all likelihood you aren't going to have either issue, but it's not worth the risk when the correct information is available.
I had to guess at my first attempt as no one had yet documented it, I didn't know I could get access to PIWIS, and my dealer flat lied to me (claiming no spec existed). Even still my derived value was only 1nm (0.7 ft-lb) over the spec.
I have worked on cars and other mechanical objects with threaded fasteners for a long time. The 22 nm (~16 ft-lbs) you quoted seemed too low. That's why I looked into this more.
From what I can tell, this drain plug and oil pan are the same as the *recent* VW Touaregs and Audis that have the same 3.0 Diesel V6 engine. I saw 22 ft-lbs quoted for these, which makes more sense than 22 nm. Even if our oil drain plug and pan are different, I went through the following thought process.
1) The threads on my 2016 Cayenne Diesel oil drain plug are size M14x1.5 with a 6mm internal hex. I measured all of this.
2) The oil drain plug is steel (male drain plug) going into steel (female oil pan/threaded boss). Although I have heard someone mention aluminum oil pans, I tested my parts with a magnet and they are steel.
3) The threads are obviously lubricated (because of the engine oil which runs onto the female threads).
22 ft-lbs seems about right, and it is within the safe range for torque for this application. So that is what I used.
If you or anyone else has any thoughts or basis for a different torque (other than what Porsche currently has listed), I would be happy to hear it.
b-man
Last edited by b-man; 01-20-2016 at 09:14 AM.
#73
From what I can tell, this drain plug and oil pan are the same as the *recent* VW Touaregs and Audis that have the same 3.0 Diesel V6 engine.
I saw 22 ft-lbs quoted for these
I specifically quoted my document source expressly so others could check for themselves rather than take my word for it.
2) The oil drain plug is steel (male drain plug) going into steel (female oil pan/threaded boss). Although I have heard someone mention aluminum oil pans, I tested my parts with a magnet and they are steel.
If yours is steel then it could very well be that the higher torque is correct. Someone should pull up the "WM 1001IN Tightening torques for engine" document in PIWIS/TSI for a .2 VIN and see if it changed. The latest update still says 22nm for the .1 though.
If you or anyone else has any thoughts or basis for a different torque (other than what Porsche currently has listed), I would be happy to hear it.
#74
You've seen their official document (e.g. the PIWIS/TSI equiv) or someone has just repeated it? I'm not directly impugning your source, just pointing out that if it you didn't see the official document first hand it could be anything from a misunderstanding (nm vs ft-lbs) to a "random" guess.
I specifically quoted my document source expressly so others could check for themselves rather than take my word for it.
I specifically quoted my document source expressly so others could check for themselves rather than take my word for it.
Maybe a change for the 958.2? Mine is definitely non-ferrous.
If yours is steel then it could very well be that the higher torque is correct. Someone should pull up the "WM 1001IN Tightening torques for engine" document in PIWIS/TSI for a .2 VIN and see if it changed. The latest update still says 22nm for the .1 though.
If yours is steel then it could very well be that the higher torque is correct. Someone should pull up the "WM 1001IN Tightening torques for engine" document in PIWIS/TSI for a .2 VIN and see if it changed. The latest update still says 22nm for the .1 though.
But, I remember thinking it's just one data point because I can imagine the plug could have been tightened *dry* at the factory, then the pan attached to the bottom of the engine, then filled with oil. So that could have made the plug slightly "stuck."
b-man
#75
Yes, I did do that and I remember it took a surprisingly high amount of torque to loosen it. At the moment I can't remember exactly how much. I *think* I used a torque wrench at 16 ft-lbs, then 22 ft-lbs, and then kept adjusting it higher until it broke free at significantly more than 22 ft-lbs.
If you don't mind, PM me your VIN and I'll refill my PIWIS account and pull the document specific to your car and see what it says. I'm really curious now and it would be good to update my document accordingly if the value differs for yours.