There you go.

 

What does that correlate to in terms of RPM? 8500rpm at 110ish?


Seems like he's getting boost creep or needs to work on the boost by speed settings to smooth things out. The car isn't making anywhere near enough power to spin the tires on the dyno.

Torque fall off isn't that bad, but considering it only makes 375 peak it would be nice to hold it up higher.

Whats with the crazy spike at the end?

 

Am I the only one who can't view it??

 

I think so.

Refresh the page, my server has been acting up all day.

Edit: It isn't only you, now for me too, all my sites have been acting up although there are thunderstorms over the data center so that might be a fair explanation? If you really want to see it, pm me your email address I'll email it to you.

Edit 2: Back up, that was weird...

 

Seriously you guys are the only people who complain about a TT360CS...

The kit is complete and it works... and those barrel intercoolers are about the best possible decision of that whole setup, great cooling ALL the time, while taking up a minimal amount of space. I think the whole project is awesome and far from a hack job...

 

And just what qualifies you to make those statements?

Ever built something that made near 1600rwhp in a street car?

Got a degree in engineering to back up those claims of thermal efficiency?

Have hundreds of road and dyno datalogs testing many different configurations of IC's, placement, etc?

How many road race cars use air:water intercoolers? Porsche on the GT2 or turbo... uhh nope. Surely if they were so great Ferraris own engineers would have known what you think is so obvious and put them on their production twin turbo supercar. Oh wait, no, they used air:air on the F40. Yeah, the 19yr old kid is right and all the guys with million dollar budgets building top of the line cars are wrong.

Just so happens I have all those things, and slapping a couple turbos and shiny piping on an expensive car doesn't impress me in the least. Yeah it works reasonably well... but compared to what? The Gallardo TT makes 300-500 more hp?

The fact that it has a fancy version of some home depot worm gear clamps just about brings me to tears.

Yes it's neat and all that, but my personal EXPERIENCED opinon is that there is quite a bit of room for improvement. The fact that you think there would need to be some massive production run to get pistons/rods/crank for it just shows your vast lack of experience.

You're way outta your league here sport, go back to the preverbial kiddy pool forum, the grownups are trying to talk here.

 

You just got knocked the f#@k out

 

OH SNAP....

I gatta agree with Vicious, there are some shortcuts in the system which could be improved, especially on a car of this value....

 

^whew, owned by vicious.

Remind me never to disagree with you Vicious in anything even remotely related to engineering.

 

Vicious hit the nail on the head pretty good here. A/w work great for 6 seconds at a time!! I would love to see the ait after a half hour of drive time. Slap some wiggins clamps in there too.

 

Wiggins are pretty but a pita to seal and the o-rings can break down over time. Plus it pretty much hard mounts the tubing which can be interesting sometimes. I would settle for a nice t-bolt clamp, but those damn worm gear clamps are used for dryer ducting, not on a flipper ferrari.

I have no problem with anyone disagreeing with me on engineering related things, they just damn well better be able to back up the bull****. Engineering is what I do, so you better have a damn good argument to call me on it. I'm not sure that 19yr old kid is qualified to dimension my drawings let alone have a relevant discussion on fluidynamics.

 

I'm not saying you're wrong, but sometimes you need to look past the age factor (or at least stop bashing him for it). I know plenty of young people that can hold a very good conversation, better than some adults I know. Age isn't everything...

 

I don't think I could do that to a CS but its nice to see a F360 with some serious RWHP!!!

 

absolutely stunning, god the 360CS is a fantastic looking car.

 

I agree... but it's far more common to see some <20yr old ******** that thinks he knows everything because he reads motortrend or browses a couple forums.

I'm only 26 btw.