Dyno'd the GT3 yesterday.
#16
10-28-2008, 03:31 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Age: 56
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 21 
The Dyno Jet is 2 pulls I made on a DynoJet here in Lafayette and the other was a run the PO made on a Mustang @ EVO
Last edited by IXXI Turbo; 10-28-2008 at 03:34 AM.
#17
10-28-2008, 02:07 PM
What year 997 cup is that one? I understand they got rid of the variable intake manifold that was on the earlier models for 2007+, which probably hurts torque but helps it flow a little more up top.
As for tweaking for more power, we'll see. Half of typical power optimization is correcting and optimizing the air/fuel ratios of factory programming, however I believe the factory dyno's and custom maps each GT3 motor to optimize the AFRs and there's nothing left here to optimize.
#18
10-28-2008, 07:30 PM
Those are very good rwhp results from a 997 GT3 that is bone stock.
In my area (So. Florida) the across the board rwhp numbers for stock 997 GT3's has been 350 to 365 rwhp.
My 997GT3 has dyno'ed 360 to 363 rwhp bone stock at different occasions.
Now with FVD headers and race exhaust and GIAC software it dyno'ed 392 rwhp.
IXXI Turbo your post about the 996 GT3 is incredible. You show 372 rwhp as stock. The stock power as stated by the factory is 381 bhp. That would appear to suggest a DT loss of 2%?
You could have a freak motor, if so lucky you.
What am I not understanding.
Cheers
Ranger
In my area (So. Florida) the across the board rwhp numbers for stock 997 GT3's has been 350 to 365 rwhp.
My 997GT3 has dyno'ed 360 to 363 rwhp bone stock at different occasions.
Now with FVD headers and race exhaust and GIAC software it dyno'ed 392 rwhp.
IXXI Turbo your post about the 996 GT3 is incredible. You show 372 rwhp as stock. The stock power as stated by the factory is 381 bhp. That would appear to suggest a DT loss of 2%?
You could have a freak motor, if so lucky you.
What am I not understanding.
Cheers
Ranger
#19
10-28-2008, 07:38 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Age: 56
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 21
#20
10-28-2008, 07:51 PM
I also see that at least the first dyno is uncorrected. I'm not sure what altitude that was taken at, but assuming it's at 100 feet it looks like applying a correction factor might bring it down to ~343 rwhp? That's still very good, but probably more in line with what would be expected from a 996 GT3 on a dynojet...
#21
10-28-2008, 08:08 PM
It must be a very strong car.
Ranger
#23
10-29-2008, 04:52 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Age: 56
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 21
This was Luis's old car
#24
10-30-2008, 05:38 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Age: 56
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 21 I also see that at least the first dyno is uncorrected. I'm not sure what altitude that was taken at, but assuming it's at 100 feet it looks like applying a correction factor might bring it down to ~343 rwhp? That's still very good, but probably more in line with what would be expected from a 996 GT3 on a dynojet...
These runs were made near sea level, (Lafayette Louisiana)
Last edited by IXXI Turbo; 10-30-2008 at 05:43 AM.
#26
11-02-2008, 11:19 AM
Who let the dogs out...
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The stars at night...
Posts: 574
Rep Power: 43
Are you the original owner?
#30
11-02-2008, 01:56 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 4,205
Rep Power: 204 
Ill try, I have to find a scanner (I have the sheets in my car). The dyno looks nearly identical to Luisgt3s dyno except i am 2 hp shy. I did the dyno for charity, so I wasnt really looking at the sheet too much. I was surprised though...