Gt2 rs vs 458
#46
a little less as 2:00 minutes but they won't let you ring it out, they lead you around the track, and hold you back. The cars are US spec cars with only 3 point belts, no harness and no rollbar. So I understood, but it would have been nice to.......................
#47
Ferrari are much easier to drive on a track (with paddle shift, etc.) than a Porsche, but they are more difficult to drive really fast. Unfortunately with their higher price tag they attract more posers than Porsche. Very often we see slow drivers in F430 Challenge locally. Not that they have no skills but they don't invest the required seat time to be fast.
Who was your coach at the school there ? They are really cool guys, especially the Dumoulin brothers ! Did you have the chance to try the Scuderia also ?
#48
Great comments. The 458 is definitely easier to drive than the Scud around that track with the technological improvements over the Scud. Yes they had 4 Scuds and 4 458 (no fires luckily), and 1 challenge Scud. I've since traded my 2005 430 F1 for a 2008 Scud, have yet to take delivery, this Friday I hope. It was much more race car feel to it, than the 458, but not an apples for apples. I can't wait for the 458 Scud version. That said, I race Spec Miata in NASA, so it's a totally different line through the corners, once acquainted I probably could get the cars into the mid to low 50's. They also had a Chicane at the end of the back straight which really slowed the times, and of course was safer too, for those that don't race. I am not sure of the instructors names but if you send me a PM I will send you a link to my SmugMug photos from the event. John
#49
I was thinking about the new Mclaren MP4-12C, but am concerned about it catching fire. A completely new design mid engine car with two turbo chargers. There has to be a lot of heat in there surrounded by all that composite material. Are turbo rear engine cars able to dissipate heat better than mid engine cars? What do you guys think? The GT2 RS is at least a tried and true design.
#51
I was thinking about the new Mclaren MP4-12C, but am concerned about it catching fire. A completely new design mid engine car with two turbo chargers. There has to be a lot of heat in there surrounded by all that composite material. Are turbo rear engine cars able to dissipate heat better than mid engine cars? What do you guys think? The GT2 RS is at least a tried and true design.
#53
Great comments. The 458 is definitely easier to drive than the Scud around that track with the technological improvements over the Scud. Yes they had 4 Scuds and 4 458 (no fires luckily), and 1 challenge Scud. I've since traded my 2005 430 F1 for a 2008 Scud, have yet to take delivery, this Friday I hope. It was much more race car feel to it, than the 458, but not an apples for apples. I can't wait for the 458 Scud version. That said, I race Spec Miata in NASA, so it's a totally different line through the corners, once acquainted I probably could get the cars into the mid to low 50's. They also had a Chicane at the end of the back straight which really slowed the times, and of course was safer too, for those that don't race. I am not sure of the instructors names but if you send me a PM I will send you a link to my SmugMug photos from the event. John
I will send PM.
#57
Sorry about that guys. I'll type the ad as I misread it.
"It's not about top speed,"insists project manager Andreas Preuninger, although the GT2RS will do a gearing-limited 206MPG, 192 of which it deploys during what must be a wonderfully terrifying max-attack ring lap. Acceleration to 60 MPH is also secondary -Porsche would rather quote the claimed 4.1 - second improvement from 0 to 300km/h (186 MPH) instead - but should improve by a couple of tenths, to the mid threes, and continues to be aided by a launch control system.
The shuttle is nice :-).
"It's not about top speed,"insists project manager Andreas Preuninger, although the GT2RS will do a gearing-limited 206MPG, 192 of which it deploys during what must be a wonderfully terrifying max-attack ring lap. Acceleration to 60 MPH is also secondary -Porsche would rather quote the claimed 4.1 - second improvement from 0 to 300km/h (186 MPH) instead - but should improve by a couple of tenths, to the mid threes, and continues to be aided by a launch control system.
The shuttle is nice :-).
Last edited by aviator33; 09-08-2010 at 10:16 AM.
#58
Sorry about that guys. All type the ad as I misread it.
"It's not about top speed,"insists project manager Andreas Preuninger, although the GT2RS will do a gearing-limited 206MPG, 192 of which it deploys during what must be a wonderfully terrifying max-attack ring lap. Acceleration to 60 MPH is also secondary -Porsche would rather quote the claimed 4.1 - second improvement from 0 to 300km/h (186 MPH) instead - but should improve by a couple of tenths, to the mid threes, and continues to be aided by a launch control system.
The shuttle is nice :-).
"It's not about top speed,"insists project manager Andreas Preuninger, although the GT2RS will do a gearing-limited 206MPG, 192 of which it deploys during what must be a wonderfully terrifying max-attack ring lap. Acceleration to 60 MPH is also secondary -Porsche would rather quote the claimed 4.1 - second improvement from 0 to 300km/h (186 MPH) instead - but should improve by a couple of tenths, to the mid threes, and continues to be aided by a launch control system.
The shuttle is nice :-).
#60
I would buy 100 mph, but not 186. If it's that fast, they will soon call it the widowmaker again. No human can control that speed in 4 secs. I'm not really sure the space shuttle can hit that speed in 4 secs. Wonder what the G's would be?