Oh yeah...I red wrong! But anyway we are talking about a 800 hp supercar that can do better than a GT3 on track...that's too strange...just thinking about JC suggested Koenigsegg to put a rear wing on the back of their new car...they should know that yet...

 

You're taking the best Gt3 time and comparing it with the CCR's time the first time koenigsegg took it to the ring. It also has a 7:34 up there an it undoubtedly can go faster.

 

The problem was if it can't do that!!

 

can't do what?

The gt3 is not anywhere near as fast as the koenigsegg, period. The Carerra gt has two slower times than the GT3 up there too, is it slower? Companies go to the ring to test, testing isn't always fast.

 

What I was talking about is the fact the K wasn't able to give a better time with all that power...for sure it gets!
How not to get a proper time on lap with 800+ hp??

 

Why don't Ferrari's ever come up on that list?

 

But it did give a better time, a 1:34. And, it can probably go faster. You have no idea who drove the car, what their experience at the ring was, traffic conditions, weather, what koenigsegg was even trying to accomplish when they were there. To proclaim that it's not able to do something based on this list is assinine.

 

Ferrari doesn't (won't?) test there. However, sport auto has run cars like the 360 and 360CS, they're just farther down the list.

 

Rohl stated in an interview he'll never do a flying fast lap in the CGT, from what I recall. Those laps are not to the car's full potential.

 

Oh yeah that's the main problem!!
Someone has to time lap of the cars...