VIDEO: enzo vs CGT vs SLR vs Murci
#1
08-13-2006, 11:07 PM
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Philippines
Posts: 877
Rep Power: 59 
VIDEO: enzo vs CGT vs SLR vs Murci
... Conti GT and DB9 thrown in there as well.
Sorry if this is a repost. But the message is clear: you want to go around corners... take the Porsche
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...he+lamborghini
Sorry if this is a repost. But the message is clear: you want to go around corners... take the Porsche
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...he+lamborghini
#7
08-14-2006, 12:18 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 15,576
Rep Power: 681 
Enzo is crazy fast from 0~300km than others. CGT is truly a winner in the handling course especially it still has a traditional 6 speed rather than F1 type of tranny.
thanks for sharing!
thanks for sharing!
Trending Topics
#10
08-14-2006, 03:28 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oakland, Michigan
Age: 57
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 22
I am not sure why the CGT was so slow to 300kph. It will do 200kph in 9.9 it seems strange that it would take over 24 more seconds to do the last 100kph. The SLR was faster in that test to 300kph which doesn't make much sense either as it is much heavier with similiar horsepower.
I can understand it being slower than the Enzo but it would seem it should be between the Enzo and the SLR to 300kph.
Has anyone else seen other tests of the CGT to 300kph?
I can understand it being slower than the Enzo but it would seem it should be between the Enzo and the SLR to 300kph.
Has anyone else seen other tests of the CGT to 300kph?
#11
08-14-2006, 05:36 AM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by 20C4S
Enzo is crazy fast from 0~300km than others. CGT is truly a winner in the handling course especially it still has a traditional 6 speed rather than F1 type of tranny.
thanks for sharing!
thanks for sharing!
I have driven all the cars in that test at high and low city speeds as well as on the track and I picked the obvious one for me! In my opinion the CGT is the best 'out of the box' supercar on the market...maybe the only exception would be the Zonda F clubsport...but then again I have not driven one...
Last edited by VRAlexander; 11-11-2006 at 07:46 PM.
#12
08-14-2006, 05:50 AM
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Philippines
Posts: 877
Rep Power: 59
Originally Posted by VRAlexander
Attachment 39417
I have driven all the cars in that test at high and low city speeds as well as on the track and I picked the obvious one for me! In my opinion the CGT is the best 'out of the box' supercar on the market...maybe the only exception would be the Zonda F clubsport...but then again I have not driven one...
I have driven all the cars in that test at high and low city speeds as well as on the track and I picked the obvious one for me! In my opinion the CGT is the best 'out of the box' supercar on the market...maybe the only exception would be the Zonda F clubsport...but then again I have not driven one...
I recall last year during one of the Porsche events I attended, where I was blessed with the opportunity to have dinner with Walter Rohrl, I asked him his impressions of both cars. He said that the Enzo seemed engineered to feel like a racecar even at low speeds. He literally said that the CGT felt "trucklike" compared to the Enzo, when just driving around. But once you were really going for it, the CGT felt a lot more composed and sure-footed. I guess he's obviously biased, but it does seem that this independent test proves that the CGT delivers the goods where it counts (i.e., laptimes).
He DID mention though that the power of the Enzo was amazing compared with the CGT.
#13
08-14-2006, 06:21 AM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by hesperus
VRA, how did the Enzo feel compared to the CGT? I've only ridden in a CGT, but never in an Enzo (there are none in the country where I live)
I recall last year during one of the Porsche events I attended, where I was blessed with the opportunity to have dinner with Walter Rohrl, I asked him his impressions of both cars. He said that the Enzo seemed engineered to feel like a racecar even at low speeds. He literally said that the CGT felt "trucklike" compared to the Enzo, when just driving around. But once you were really going for it, the CGT felt a lot more composed and sure-footed. I guess he's obviously biased, but it does seem that this independent test proves that the CGT delivers the goods where it counts (i.e., laptimes).
He DID mention though that the power of the Enzo was amazing compared with the CGT.
I recall last year during one of the Porsche events I attended, where I was blessed with the opportunity to have dinner with Walter Rohrl, I asked him his impressions of both cars. He said that the Enzo seemed engineered to feel like a racecar even at low speeds. He literally said that the CGT felt "trucklike" compared to the Enzo, when just driving around. But once you were really going for it, the CGT felt a lot more composed and sure-footed. I guess he's obviously biased, but it does seem that this independent test proves that the CGT delivers the goods where it counts (i.e., laptimes).
He DID mention though that the power of the Enzo was amazing compared with the CGT.
