Notices
GT3/GT2 Performance and Track Discussion on the Porsche GT3 and GT2

GT3 Runs 12.01@118!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #31  
Old 01-28-2007, 04:27 PM
6088TTS's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,739
Rep Power: 91
6088TTS has a spectacular aura about6088TTS has a spectacular aura about6088TTS has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by rajtt
HERE is a test of the 996 GT3 by the same mag (C&D) where they trip the 1320' in 12.3 seconds at an identical 118 mph. The 40 hp increase on the 997 GT3 may have been offset at least partly by the 190 lb increase. In any event, the 996's hp rating was ridiculously conservative, even by Porsche's standards!
i've got NOTHING TO SAY but to such a posts... u guys really think the 996GT3 is any part as fast or as good as the 997GT3??? you guys all think that Porsche is retarded??? oh man...

Alan
 
  #32  
Old 01-28-2007, 06:11 PM
Z06's Avatar
Z06
Z06 is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 262
Rep Power: 31
Z06 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by dr_sharp
Link? Name of magazine? Year?

Thanks,
-dr_sharp
Here you go http://www.motortrend.com/features/p...fications.html
 
  #33  
Old 01-28-2007, 06:15 PM
rajtt's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 23
rajtt is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by 6088TTS
i've got NOTHING TO SAY but to such a posts... u guys really think the 996GT3 is any part as fast or as good as the 997GT3??? you guys all think that Porsche is retarded??? oh man...

Alan
Please refrain from putting words in the mouths of fellow members. Someone requested a link to a 996 GT3 test that showed comparable 1/4 mile performance and I merely obliged. Both tests were by C&D, albeit at different times, and the trap speeds are the same. No one doubts that the 997 is faster but until we have real world comparisons we'll just have to speculate based on the limited independent test data available. Make what you will of it, but don't attribute your misguided conclusions to anyone but yourself!
 

Last edited by rajtt; 01-28-2007 at 06:17 PM.
  #34  
Old 01-28-2007, 08:05 PM
dr_sharp's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoTex
Posts: 483
Rep Power: 38
dr_sharp is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by rajtt
Please refrain from putting words in the mouths of fellow members. Someone requested a link to a 996 GT3 test that showed comparable 1/4 mile performance and I merely obliged. Both tests were by C&D, albeit at different times, and the trap speeds are the same. No one doubts that the 997 is faster but until we have real world comparisons we'll just have to speculate based on the limited independent test data available. Make what you will of it, but don't attribute your misguided conclusions to anyone but yourself!
So it's better to draw wrong conclusions with limited data than to draw correct conclusions based on assumptions?

Remember, Porsche hasn't changed... the same underestimate of hp that applied to the 996GT3 will probably be carried over to the 997GT3 and if you think for a second that a car with 40hp less can consistently trap the same speed, you've got a bit to learn.
 
  #35  
Old 01-28-2007, 08:07 PM
dr_sharp's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoTex
Posts: 483
Rep Power: 38
dr_sharp is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Z06
Thanks! That's amazing. The quickest 996GT3 quarter mile I've ever seen. It will be very interesting to see what a properly driven 997 can do! A sub 12sec quarter mile from a naturally aspirated 3.6L is unheard of.
 
  #36  
Old 01-28-2007, 09:41 PM
rajtt's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 23
rajtt is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by dr_sharp
So it's better to draw wrong conclusions with limited data than to draw correct conclusions based on assumptions?
Data, limited or otherwise, is objective. Assumptions are not!

BTW, it is worth noting that the car with 40 hp less in this discussion also weighs 190 lbs less. The results are not terribly surprising considering that trap speeds correlate to power-to-weight ratios. No one is arguing the fact that the 997 is the quicker/faster car, just what the difference will be.
Originally Posted by dr_sharp
Remember, Porsche hasn't changed...
Gee, thanks for stating the obvious!
 
  #37  
Old 01-28-2007, 09:58 PM
dr_sharp's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoTex
Posts: 483
Rep Power: 38
dr_sharp is infamous around these parts
I've got 3075lbs for the 997GT3 via Porsche USA
http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/91...s/?gtabindex=5

And 3043lbs for the 996GT3 (mkII) via Topspeed.com
http://www.topspeed.com/cars/porsche...96-ar1257.html

I'm not sure where you're getting 190lbs.

And if you want to conclude that the 996 is just as fast as the 997 based on a single comparison, go right ahead. Personally, I'll stick with assumptions and trust Porsche.

Originally Posted by rajtt
Gee, thanks for stating the obvious!
No prob... just making sure you understand... things don't seem to be quite as obvious for you.
 
  #38  
Old 01-28-2007, 10:04 PM
LUISGT3's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minneapolis, Mn
Age: 48
Posts: 16,073
Rep Power: 1069
LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !
My car is under 3000 lbs. I am sure that the 997 is definately a better car. The difference in performance is not big enough for any of us posting on here to notice. Check out the new Excellence.
 
  #39  
Old 01-28-2007, 10:08 PM
rajtt's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 23
rajtt is infamous around these parts
C&D Measured Curb Weights

996 GT3 curbweight: 3050 lbs. LINK

997 GT3 curb weight: 3240 lbs. LINK.

These are actual measured curb weights rather than quoted or estimated numbers so the 190 lb weight difference, hard as it may be to digest, is real!

Originally Posted by LUIS95993
My car is under 3000 lbs. I am sure that the 997 is definately a better car. The difference in performance is not big enough for any of us posting on here to notice. Check out the new Excellence.
My thoughts exactly!
 

Last edited by rajtt; 01-28-2007 at 10:10 PM.
  #40  
Old 01-29-2007, 02:40 AM
6088TTS's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,739
Rep Power: 91
6088TTS has a spectacular aura about6088TTS has a spectacular aura about6088TTS has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by rajtt
Please refrain from putting words in the mouths of fellow members. Someone requested a link to a 996 GT3 test that showed comparable 1/4 mile performance and I merely obliged. Both tests were by C&D, albeit at different times, and the trap speeds are the same. No one doubts that the 997 is faster but until we have real world comparisons we'll just have to speculate based on the limited independent test data available. Make what you will of it, but don't attribute your misguided conclusions to anyone but yourself!
misguided conclusion??? i merely said there is NO WAY a 996GT3 is as fast as the 997GT3... whats wrong with that?

Alan
 

Last edited by 6088TTS; 01-29-2007 at 02:57 AM.
  #41  
Old 01-29-2007, 10:52 AM
rajtt's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 23
rajtt is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by 6088TTS
misguided conclusion??? i merely said there is NO WAY a 996GT3 is as fast as the 997GT3... whats wrong with that?
As LUIS opined and as substantiated by both C&D's and MT's tests, the difference between these two cars is a lot closer than you'd like to believe! In any real world comparison, this would be a driver's race with the 997 having an edge.

Originally Posted by 6088TTS
you guys all think that Porsche is retarded??? oh man...

Alan
Certainly not my opinioin so that would equate to putting words in my mouth.
 
  #42  
Old 01-29-2007, 11:04 AM
geetee's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 19454
Posts: 1,346
Rep Power: 88
geetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant future
How is the gearing between the two?
Any difference? I thought the 997 gearings were shorter.
 
  #43  
Old 01-29-2007, 12:16 PM
rajtt's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 23
rajtt is infamous around these parts
Gear Ratios

Originally Posted by geetee
How is the gearing between the two?
Any difference? I thought the 997 gearings were shorter.
Gear Ratio Comparison (same rear end ratio of 3.44:1):

Gea---------996 GT3--------------997 GT3
1-----------3.82------------------3.82
2-----------2.15------------------2.26
3-----------1.56------------------1.64
4-----------1.21------------------1.29
5-----------1.00------------------1.06
6-----------0.85------------------0.92

While 1st is identical, 2nd through 5th are roughly 5% shorter on the 997 (6th being 8% shorter). Not a signifcant difference but it takes advantage of the slightly higher redline on the 997 (8400 vs. 8200 rpm).

Upon further reseraching into the curb weights, I've gotten widly varying numbers for the 996, so the weight difference between the two may not be nearly as significant as I'd estimated based on the two C&D reports. This also restores my faith in Porsche's focus on weight reduction on these cars. I apologize for any confusion that this may have caused. C&D's measured poundage of 3240 for the 997 GT3 certainly seems off the mark!
 
  #44  
Old 01-29-2007, 12:31 PM
geetee's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 19454
Posts: 1,346
Rep Power: 88
geetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant futuregeetee has a brilliant future
With slightly shorter 2-6 gears and roughly 30-40 more rwhp ( Im not sure if this is correct though, anyone have a link?) , the 997 should trap 3-5 more mph right? Well, assuming the weight is similar btw 996 and 997. I wonder if the 997's needs to be broken in more...like 8-10k miles... to see the true power. Who knows, maybe the 997 really did gain a good 100-150 lbs.
 
  #45  
Old 01-29-2007, 12:58 PM
dr_sharp's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoTex
Posts: 483
Rep Power: 38
dr_sharp is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by rajtt
Gear Ratio Comparison (same rear end ratio of 3.44:1):

Gea---------996 GT3--------------997 GT3
1-----------3.82------------------3.82
2-----------2.15------------------2.26
3-----------1.56------------------1.64
4-----------1.21------------------1.29
5-----------1.00------------------1.06
6-----------0.85------------------0.92

While 1st is identical, 2nd through 5th are roughly 5% shorter on the 997 (6th being 8% shorter). Not a signifcant difference but it takes advantage of the slightly higher redline on the 997 (8400 vs. 8200 rpm).

Upon further reseraching into the curb weights, I've gotten widly varying numbers for the 996, so the weight difference between the two may not be nearly as significant as I'd estimated based on the two C&D reports. This also restores my faith in Porsche's focus on weight reduction on these cars. I apologize for any confusion that this may have caused. C&D's measured poundage of 3240 for the 997 GT3 certainly seems off the mark!
I agree... I could see porsche being off by something like plus or minus 50lbs but to be off by 150lbs+ is a bit fishy. Maybe C&D forgot to get out of the car when they weighed in

Never-the-less, it was a very interesting article.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: GT3 Runs 12.01@118!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23 PM.