Comparison test between 997TT, GT3, GT3 RS and C2S w/ X51. Surprising results.
#1
Comparison test between 997TT, GT3, GT3 RS and C2S w/ X51. Surprising results.
GT Purely Porsche magazine out of the UK has a interesting comparison test this month between the four cars at the Millbrook Proving Ground and Bedford Autodrome. Results below.
Acceleration
0-60:
C2S - 4.4
GT3 - 4.5
GT3RS - 4.4
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 3.6
0-100:
C2S - 10.2
GT3 - 9.9
GT3RS - 9.6
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 8.4
0-150:
C2S - 25.2
GT3 - 23.1
GT3RS - 23.2
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 19.0
100-150:
C2S - 15.0
GT3 - 13.2
GT3RS - 13.6
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 10.6
*Note the huge effect the GT3RS's large rear wing/increased drag has on it's high-speed acceleration above. The GT3 is actually faster than the RS from both 0 to 150 mph as well as 100-150.
Track times
C2S - 1.06:09
GT3 - 1.04:02
GT3RS - 1.03:40
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 1.04:02
Surprisingly, the TT matched the GT3 around the track. The RS was 6/10's quicker than both..which ain't much.
Acceleration
0-60:
C2S - 4.4
GT3 - 4.5
GT3RS - 4.4
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 3.6
0-100:
C2S - 10.2
GT3 - 9.9
GT3RS - 9.6
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 8.4
0-150:
C2S - 25.2
GT3 - 23.1
GT3RS - 23.2
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 19.0
100-150:
C2S - 15.0
GT3 - 13.2
GT3RS - 13.6
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 10.6
*Note the huge effect the GT3RS's large rear wing/increased drag has on it's high-speed acceleration above. The GT3 is actually faster than the RS from both 0 to 150 mph as well as 100-150.
Track times
C2S - 1.06:09
GT3 - 1.04:02
GT3RS - 1.03:40
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 1.04:02
Surprisingly, the TT matched the GT3 around the track. The RS was 6/10's quicker than both..which ain't much.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 08-24-2007 at 09:59 PM.
#6
Originally Posted by Ritesh
The TT is quite impressive on paper. However, IMHO the GT3/GT3RS is alot more fun/involving to drive. I prefer the involvement of the 3 to the fast/GT feel of the TT.
#7
Trending Topics
#9
gt3= faster throught the corners (handlng)
turbo= faster on the straights (power)....what course was this at because a smaller tigher course vs a longer stretched course would yield different results...
turbo= faster on the straights (power)....what course was this at because a smaller tigher course vs a longer stretched course would yield different results...
Last edited by drjoe; 08-24-2007 at 10:43 PM.
#10
Originally Posted by Ritesh
Mag racing - I love it.
The TT is quite impressive on paper. However, IMHO the GT3/GT3RS is alot more fun/involving to drive. I prefer the involvement of the 3 to the fast/GT feel of the TT.
The TT is quite impressive on paper. However, IMHO the GT3/GT3RS is alot more fun/involving to drive. I prefer the involvement of the 3 to the fast/GT feel of the TT.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 08-24-2007 at 11:11 PM.
#11
Originally Posted by drjoe
gt3= faster throught the corners (handlng)
turbo= faster on the straights (power)....what course was this at because a smaller tigher course vs a longer stretched course would have different outcomes...
turbo= faster on the straights (power)....what course was this at because a smaller tigher course vs a longer stretched course would have different outcomes...
The testers stated that; "the compact loop at Bedford provides an excellent mixture of open and tight radii, first/second/third/fourth gear turns, two straights to display grunt, heavy braking zones and some high speed transitions. The fastest car here would be the fastest on any other circuit bar an oval - of that there can be no doubt."
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 08-24-2007 at 10:45 PM.
#12
Originally Posted by CAPTLST
Good find.... I can't belive the C2S is faster than the GT3 0 to 60!
Here's the ratios:
C2S 1st-6th:
3.91
2.32
1.61
1.28
1.08
.88
GT3s 1st -6th:
3.82
2.26
1.64
1.29
1.06
.92
#14
Remember its the C2S with the X51 power kit.
According to the mag, its interesting to note that the gearing ratio in the C2S is geared for 0 to 60 timing ("...that most useless performance benchmark"), so that it can "generate good numbers for magazine road tests". They also say that the gearing in the GT3/RS is tuned for the Ring.
According to the mag, its interesting to note that the gearing ratio in the C2S is geared for 0 to 60 timing ("...that most useless performance benchmark"), so that it can "generate good numbers for magazine road tests". They also say that the gearing in the GT3/RS is tuned for the Ring.
#15
Originally Posted by Ritesh
Mag racing - I love it.
The TT is quite impressive on paper. However, IMHO the GT3/GT3RS is alot more fun/involving to drive. I prefer the involvement of the 3 to the fast/GT feel of the TT.
The TT is quite impressive on paper. However, IMHO the GT3/GT3RS is alot more fun/involving to drive. I prefer the involvement of the 3 to the fast/GT feel of the TT.