Notices
GT3/GT2 Performance and Track Discussion on the Porsche GT3 and GT2

Comparison test between 997TT, GT3, GT3 RS and C2S w/ X51. Surprising results.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-24-2007, 08:24 PM
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Comparison test between 997TT, GT3, GT3 RS and C2S w/ X51. Surprising results.

GT Purely Porsche magazine out of the UK has a interesting comparison test this month between the four cars at the Millbrook Proving Ground and Bedford Autodrome. Results below.

Acceleration

0-60:
C2S - 4.4
GT3 - 4.5
GT3RS - 4.4
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 3.6

0-100:
C2S - 10.2
GT3 - 9.9
GT3RS - 9.6
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 8.4

0-150:
C2S - 25.2
GT3 - 23.1
GT3RS - 23.2
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 19.0

100-150:
C2S - 15.0
GT3 - 13.2
GT3RS - 13.6
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 10.6

*Note the huge effect the GT3RS's large rear wing/increased drag has on it's high-speed acceleration above. The GT3 is actually faster than the RS from both 0 to 150 mph as well as 100-150.

Track times

C2S - 1.06:09
GT3 - 1.04:02
GT3RS - 1.03:40
997TT (6-MT with Sport Chrono)- 1.04:02

Surprisingly, the TT matched the GT3 around the track. The RS was 6/10's quicker than both..which ain't much.
 

Last edited by Divexxtreme; 08-24-2007 at 08:59 PM.
  #2  
Old 08-24-2007, 08:43 PM
deputydog95's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 9,541
Rep Power: 502
deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !
I'm not surprised at all. Sign me up for a TT
 
  #3  
Old 08-24-2007, 08:48 PM
LUISGT3's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minneapolis, Mn
Age: 48
Posts: 16,073
Rep Power: 1069
LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !
Cool test.
 
  #4  
Old 08-24-2007, 09:05 PM
12:03's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 986
Rep Power: 61
12:03 has a spectacular aura about12:03 has a spectacular aura about
So in theory the TT is a better car and more well rounded. It does the lap times, but also can sprint better.

Thanks for posting

They should have ran a CGT through there for good measure.
 
  #5  
Old 08-24-2007, 09:18 PM
Ritesh's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tx
Age: 54
Posts: 1,057
Rep Power: 60
Ritesh is infamous around these parts
Mag racing - I love it.

The TT is quite impressive on paper. However, IMHO the GT3/GT3RS is alot more fun/involving to drive. I prefer the involvement of the 3 to the fast/GT feel of the TT.
 
  #6  
Old 08-24-2007, 09:20 PM
LUISGT3's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minneapolis, Mn
Age: 48
Posts: 16,073
Rep Power: 1069
LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Ritesh

The TT is quite impressive on paper. However, IMHO the GT3/GT3RS is alot more fun/involving to drive. I prefer the involvement of the 3 to the fast/GT feel of the TT.
+1.............................
 
  #7  
Old 08-24-2007, 09:22 PM
CAPTLST's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Florida
Age: 48
Posts: 1,965
Rep Power: 138
CAPTLST has a reputation beyond reputeCAPTLST has a reputation beyond reputeCAPTLST has a reputation beyond reputeCAPTLST has a reputation beyond reputeCAPTLST has a reputation beyond reputeCAPTLST has a reputation beyond reputeCAPTLST has a reputation beyond reputeCAPTLST has a reputation beyond reputeCAPTLST has a reputation beyond reputeCAPTLST has a reputation beyond reputeCAPTLST has a reputation beyond repute
Good find.... I can't belive the C2S is faster than the GT3 0 to 60!
 
  #8  
Old 08-24-2007, 09:34 PM
eclou's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,027
Rep Power: 199
eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !
The C2S and TT were tested with street tires, vs the Cups on the Gt3/RS. Another factor to consider
 
  #9  
Old 08-24-2007, 09:36 PM
drjoe's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: houston
Age: 49
Posts: 1,108
Rep Power: 66
drjoe is a jewel in the roughdrjoe is a jewel in the roughdrjoe is a jewel in the roughdrjoe is a jewel in the rough
gt3= faster throught the corners (handlng)
turbo= faster on the straights (power)....what course was this at because a smaller tigher course vs a longer stretched course would yield different results...
 

Last edited by drjoe; 08-24-2007 at 09:43 PM.
  #10  
Old 08-24-2007, 09:36 PM
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Ritesh
Mag racing - I love it.

The TT is quite impressive on paper. However, IMHO the GT3/GT3RS is alot more fun/involving to drive. I prefer the involvement of the 3 to the fast/GT feel of the TT.
Forum racing. I love it.
 

Last edited by Divexxtreme; 08-24-2007 at 10:11 PM.
  #11  
Old 08-24-2007, 09:41 PM
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by drjoe
gt3= faster throught the corners (handlng)
turbo= faster on the straights (power)....what course was this at because a smaller tigher course vs a longer stretched course would have different outcomes...
It was a small course.

The testers stated that; "the compact loop at Bedford provides an excellent mixture of open and tight radii, first/second/third/fourth gear turns, two straights to display grunt, heavy braking zones and some high speed transitions. The fastest car here would be the fastest on any other circuit bar an oval - of that there can be no doubt."
 

Last edited by Divexxtreme; 08-24-2007 at 09:45 PM.
  #12  
Old 08-24-2007, 09:44 PM
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,510
Rep Power: 788
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by CAPTLST
Good find.... I can't belive the C2S is faster than the GT3 0 to 60!
It boiled down to the shorter gearing that the C2S has.

Here's the ratios:

C2S 1st-6th:
3.91
2.32
1.61
1.28
1.08
.88

GT3s 1st -6th:
3.82
2.26
1.64
1.29
1.06
.92
 
  #13  
Old 08-24-2007, 09:46 PM
vincentdds's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NW
Posts: 5,523
Rep Power: 273
vincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond repute
Similar to the AMG, the TT is fast but you don't feel it.
 

Last edited by vincentdds; 08-24-2007 at 10:40 PM.
  #14  
Old 08-24-2007, 11:09 PM
seattle_sun's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 642
Rep Power: 45
seattle_sun is just really niceseattle_sun is just really niceseattle_sun is just really niceseattle_sun is just really nice
Remember its the C2S with the X51 power kit.

According to the mag, its interesting to note that the gearing ratio in the C2S is geared for 0 to 60 timing ("...that most useless performance benchmark"), so that it can "generate good numbers for magazine road tests". They also say that the gearing in the GT3/RS is tuned for the Ring.
 
  #15  
Old 08-25-2007, 12:15 AM
JWGT2's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: CA
Age: 48
Posts: 544
Rep Power: 42
JWGT2 is infamous around these partsJWGT2 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Ritesh
Mag racing - I love it.

The TT is quite impressive on paper. However, IMHO the GT3/GT3RS is alot more fun/involving to drive. I prefer the involvement of the 3 to the fast/GT feel of the TT.
Well said...it's truly tough to quantify the overall involvement and feel you get in GT3/RS.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Comparison test between 997TT, GT3, GT3 RS and C2S w/ X51. Surprising results.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 PM.