6SpeedOnline - Porsche Forum and Luxury Car Resource

Lamborghini Discussion on the Lamborghini Countach, Diablo, Murciélago, Gallardo, Reventón, Aventador, and new Huracán.

LP640 vs SLR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 06-05-2008, 11:02 AM
LUISGT3's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minneapolis, Mn
Age: 48
Posts: 16,073
Rep Power: 1069
LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !
It's not quite as easy as just "stomping on the gas". The SLR has tremendous amounts of tourque and wheelspin is going to happen in any of the 1st 3 gears of the Autobox. Modulating and controling the wheelspin in SLR's is much harder to do than shift an E-gear LP640 IMO.
 
Reply
  #17  
Old 06-05-2008, 11:06 AM
johnw(to)'s Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: toronto
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 22
johnw(to) is infamous around these parts
correct. 'stomping on the gas' in a 600+ hp car wont get you very far. and wasnt the lp e-gear? all he had to do was stomp on the gas
 
Reply
  #18  
Old 06-05-2008, 12:38 PM
Speedshaq's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EU
Posts: 4,103
Rep Power: 221
Speedshaq Is a GOD !Speedshaq Is a GOD !Speedshaq Is a GOD !Speedshaq Is a GOD !Speedshaq Is a GOD !Speedshaq Is a GOD !Speedshaq Is a GOD !Speedshaq Is a GOD !Speedshaq Is a GOD !Speedshaq Is a GOD !Speedshaq Is a GOD !
The SLR isn't stock for sure.
 
Reply
  #19  
Old 06-06-2008, 10:53 PM
Apex12's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Evanston
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0
Apex12 is infamous around these parts
slr had a better driver probably but dont forget that a ecu tune and pulley help so much like night a day in certain cars.
 
Reply
  #20  
Old 06-08-2008, 11:34 PM
996TTDave's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 2,597
Rep Power: 123
996TTDave has a spectacular aura about996TTDave has a spectacular aura about996TTDave has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by Blazing
LOL,completely forgot about that.
Judging by your cars i thought it was just a misthought, i know you know your stuff
 
Reply
  #21  
Old 06-09-2008, 09:17 PM
Drive2Live's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 20
Drive2Live is infamous around these parts
Both are very nasty cars but I believe the SLR is faster stock than an LP640 forsure...
 
Reply
  #22  
Old 06-09-2008, 10:03 PM
TheBlueBlur's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 214
Rep Power: 30
TheBlueBlur is a glorious beacon of lightTheBlueBlur is a glorious beacon of lightTheBlueBlur is a glorious beacon of lightTheBlueBlur is a glorious beacon of lightTheBlueBlur is a glorious beacon of light
it also seemed like the LP started the race with the revs too low. It probably wasn't in its prime powerband.
 
Reply
  #23  
Old 06-09-2008, 10:06 PM
ecks's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chandigarh,India
Posts: 299
Rep Power: 35
ecks is a name known to allecks is a name known to allecks is a name known to allecks is a name known to allecks is a name known to allecks is a name known to all
Originally Posted by Drive2Live
Both are very nasty cars but I believe the SLR is faster stock than an LP640 forsure...


The 722 , yes. The standard SLR , no.
 
Reply
  #24  
Old 06-10-2008, 12:41 PM
sideWays_swe's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: sweden
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 41
sideWays_swe is a jewel in the roughsideWays_swe is a jewel in the roughsideWays_swe is a jewel in the rough
Keep in mind that the SLR is lighter and is RWD, AWD is just an disadvantage in hi speeds,it steels alot of hp. If you look at all the test and times that has been done with this cars the SLR is faster even stock.

This is just ONE of several test where the SLR is faster than LP640.

Auto motor sport germany

lp640:0 - 80 km/h 3,1 s
0 - 100 km/h 3,8 s
0 - 120 km/h 5,1 s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h 6,3 s
0 - 160 km/h 8,2 s
0 - 180 km/h 9,8 s
0 - 200 km/h 12,0 -

SLR
0 - 80 km/h 2,9 s
0 - 100 km/h 3,8 s
0 - 120 km/h 4,8 s
0 - 130 km/h 5,4 s
0 - 140 km/h 6,2 s
0 - 160 km/h 7,7 s
0 - 180 km/h 8,8 s
0 - 200 km/h 10,7 s
 
Last edited by sideWays_swe; 06-10-2008 at 12:49 PM.
Reply
  #25  
Old 06-10-2008, 01:29 PM
Dutchie's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 355
Rep Power: 58
Dutchie has a reputation beyond reputeDutchie has a reputation beyond reputeDutchie has a reputation beyond reputeDutchie has a reputation beyond reputeDutchie has a reputation beyond reputeDutchie has a reputation beyond reputeDutchie has a reputation beyond reputeDutchie has a reputation beyond reputeDutchie has a reputation beyond reputeDutchie has a reputation beyond reputeDutchie has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by LUISGT3
The SLR has tremendous amounts of tourque
No more needs to be said to end the discussion.
 
Reply
  #26  
Old 06-12-2008, 03:11 AM
Lay2Low's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 20
Lay2Low is infamous around these parts
That is a crazy SLR! I for sure was not expecting the LP to get walked on like that
 
Reply
  #27  
Old 06-12-2008, 04:55 AM
sideWays_swe's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: sweden
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 41
sideWays_swe is a jewel in the roughsideWays_swe is a jewel in the roughsideWays_swe is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by Lay2Low
That is a crazy SLR! I for sure was not expecting the LP to get walked on like that
May i ask why? The LP only have 14hp more then a stock SLR, the LP is heavier and has 4wd that steals alot of hp. Compare numbers and you will see that there is nothing strange about this video.
 
Reply
  #28  
Old 06-12-2008, 08:55 AM
sideWays_swe's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: sweden
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 41
sideWays_swe is a jewel in the roughsideWays_swe is a jewel in the roughsideWays_swe is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by ecks
The 722 , yes. The standard SLR , no.
Yes it is, SLR is faster then LP640. SLR and CGT is very similar in a straight line, and the CGT is much faster then LP640.
 
Reply
  #29  
Old 06-12-2008, 09:03 AM
LUISGT3's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minneapolis, Mn
Age: 48
Posts: 16,073
Rep Power: 1069
LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !LUISGT3 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by sideWays_swe
Yes it is, SLR is faster then LP640. SLR and CGT is very similar in a straight line, and the CGT is much faster then LP640.
You are correct my friend.
 
Reply
  #30  
Old 06-12-2008, 09:17 AM
BeastRides101's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 184
Rep Power: 24
BeastRides101 is infamous around these parts
SLR's are rediculous.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes, average.
Show Printable Version
Email this Page

Advanced Search
Quick Reply: LP640 vs SLR


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:16 AM.