View Poll Results: Choose one
Porsche 2010 GT2
26
22.61%
Lexus LFA
20
17.39%
Ferrari F430 Scuderia
17
14.78%
Lamborghini LP670-4 SuperVeloce
52
45.22%
Voters: 115. You may not vote on this poll
Is Lexus crazy or what? Info on the new LFA.
#286
I would choose any 3 of those cars over the LF-A. How about a 430 scud AND a panamera turbo/quattroporte for everyday driving. If you look at it this way the choice is VERY simple.
#287
#288
19 or so pages here and who is leasing as Lexus states (buying) one of these would be my question? No way would I add a car with No history or heritage. No way would I add a car that looks like this. I'd buy a GTR in 2 seconds ( never will btw ) and park the other 300k into a car with some teeth. Yes some collectors will buy one just some
#289
This is an excerpt of a review from Car Magazine, it sums up what I have thought.
Good as the LFA is , it'd be a determined, self confident man that turned away from the faster, cheaper (and ok more ubiquitous) new Ferrari 458 Italia and stuck down a third of a million quid on a car with no real racing or supercar pedigree that will be mistaken for a new 70k Euro Nissan GT-R rival on every petrol station forecourt.
#290
Yep, unless Porsche is making a new engine that we don't know about!
The LF-A sucks, there are so many other cars available that are better.....blah, blah blah! It's Toyota/Lexus' first attempt so let's cut them a little slack......do I need to remind you of the first attempts by Porsche (actually a suped up VW) Lamborghini and Ferrari to name a few? They didn't exactly take the automotive industry by storm!
-just sayin
Last edited by UMADBRO; 01-30-2010 at 04:28 PM.
#291
An F-430 Scudiera as a daily driver? Now that's classic..........it doesn't even have door panels LOL
-just sayin
#292
so im under the impression lexus is hand picking people to lease this supercar. heres the question.. from what i have read, you have to have previously owned a lexus right. so how many ls430 owners would even think to own a car like this.. maybe 12?
o, and it looks like a gtr
o, and it looks like a gtr
#293
VS.
Seriously, who here is defending Lamborghini's heritage and pedigree when they first decided to sell a car that cost as much as a Ferrari? And please tell me that Pagani had more heritage when they offered a car that had poorer performance specs than a Ferrari 550 (yet cost more than the Ferrari); that original 400-hp Zonda had an engine straight out and unmodified from a Mercedes SL.
And regarding the Car Magazine quote, if you can afford to drop 375 large on a supercar, chances are pretty damn good that you're already determined and self-confident. The assumption that Car is making is that the choice is either the LFA or the 458, when that doesn't necessarily have to be the case. Both Car & Driver and 5th Gear feel that the 599 is the closer competitor to the LFA. Considering price, volume, and layout, this makes more sense. Also keep in mind that Car is from the UK, where the LFA costs much more than in its primary markets: the US and Japan. As such, it makes less sense to compare a car that costs twice as much as another and is built in only ~1/20th the volume.
There are plenty of people who own exotics and supercars, but have a Lexus as a daily driver. I have not heard of this prerequisite in any case, though it no doubt helps.
Last edited by Guibo; 01-31-2010 at 02:39 AM.
#294
Yep, unless Porsche is making a new engine that we don't know about!
The LF-A sucks, there are so many other cars available that are better.....blah, blah blah! It's Toyota/Lexus' first attempt so let's cut them a little slack......do I need to remind you of the first attempts by Porsche (actually a suped up VW) Lamborghini and Ferrari to name a few? They didn't exactly take the automotive industry by storm!
The LF-A sucks, there are so many other cars available that are better.....blah, blah blah! It's Toyota/Lexus' first attempt so let's cut them a little slack......do I need to remind you of the first attempts by Porsche (actually a suped up VW) Lamborghini and Ferrari to name a few? They didn't exactly take the automotive industry by storm!
I've still seen no one claiming they are leasing one. Anyone?
#295
i like reading the toyota/lexus fanboi's responses. posting pictures of tractors and beetles... brilliant.
lexus will never ever ever ever be even considered in the same league as Porsche Lamborghini Ferrari et al.
its a design exercise that may well lead to some nice improvements for the camry and corolla(ha). but dont for a second think this is the beginning of toyota's rise to supercar glory.
i see your tractor, and raise you a 1984 corolla.
lexus will never ever ever ever be even considered in the same league as Porsche Lamborghini Ferrari et al.
its a design exercise that may well lead to some nice improvements for the camry and corolla(ha). but dont for a second think this is the beginning of toyota's rise to supercar glory.
i see your tractor, and raise you a 1984 corolla.
#296
Wow, lots of hate all over the place here, I don't even own a Lexus or a Toyota and really dislike the fact that Toyata has not been building anything interesting when it comes to sports cars recently, but the LFA seems to be an interesting car. Just because it is being built by Toyota should not take anything away from the car.
If it wasn't for Chrysler then the VW group Lamborghini would have been dead as a car company. Same goes with Ferrari, if it wasn't for Fiat, Ferrari would be dead as well. Lotus would be dead if it wasn't for the Proton Group taking over them back in 94. Porsche without their joint projects with the VW group would have been in trouble as well (even before the buyout).
It seems that some folks fail to acknowledge that sometimes big companies do infuse quite a bit of their design methodology/expertise to the so called exotic automakers to actually make them viable as a business.
If it wasn't for Chrysler then the VW group Lamborghini would have been dead as a car company. Same goes with Ferrari, if it wasn't for Fiat, Ferrari would be dead as well. Lotus would be dead if it wasn't for the Proton Group taking over them back in 94. Porsche without their joint projects with the VW group would have been in trouble as well (even before the buyout).
It seems that some folks fail to acknowledge that sometimes big companies do infuse quite a bit of their design methodology/expertise to the so called exotic automakers to actually make them viable as a business.
#297
It's not really who built the car, it's the car they built; what the car can do, and how much they are charging for it. You really can't love a car that costs twice as much as cars (with some history and pedigree) that can out perform it.
It's almost the "anti-NSX"; might be "reliable", have close to supercar performance, it is built with exotic materials... but it compares (some would argue it almost compares) in performance to a Gallardo, or 997tt; but instead of costing half, if doubles the entry fee.
Possibly a great car, just not a significant one, and likely not even close to a "game changer". Plus, someone already made a carbon fiber, ten cylinder, ridiculously expensive supercar that (based on the numbers available) still outperforms the LFA for less money.
Veyron performance for a third of the money would be interesting; GTR performance for 5 times the money is not - who built it really does not matter.
It's almost the "anti-NSX"; might be "reliable", have close to supercar performance, it is built with exotic materials... but it compares (some would argue it almost compares) in performance to a Gallardo, or 997tt; but instead of costing half, if doubles the entry fee.
Possibly a great car, just not a significant one, and likely not even close to a "game changer". Plus, someone already made a carbon fiber, ten cylinder, ridiculously expensive supercar that (based on the numbers available) still outperforms the LFA for less money.
Veyron performance for a third of the money would be interesting; GTR performance for 5 times the money is not - who built it really does not matter.
#298
This is still a lexus forum...........right?
Good insight but I will simply state that Lexus doesn't need to compete with the big exotics and honestly I don't think they ever will. Lot's of racing heritage with the majors. Be that as it may, if they can create their own little niche and provide another option in this class, this is a win win situation and makes for better competition and ultimately a better product for the consumers!
+ Rep all around
Good insight but I will simply state that Lexus doesn't need to compete with the big exotics and honestly I don't think they ever will. Lot's of racing heritage with the majors. Be that as it may, if they can create their own little niche and provide another option in this class, this is a win win situation and makes for better competition and ultimately a better product for the consumers!
+ Rep all around
Last edited by UMADBRO; 01-31-2010 at 07:20 PM.
#299
No one said the LFA is a piece of junk, but imagine if Acura would have debuted the NSX priced more than the the 348 or 355 that performed much worse despite its at the time very exotic construction. Imagine if a NSX had of cost as much as the Jaguar XJ220 or Ferrari F40?
#300
I can see this car definitely exisiting in a multi exotic car household, but I can't imagine someone walking by a 458 Italia, Mclaren MP4 C-12 or even Bentley Continental GT Super Sports to pay more to own an LFA.