Nissan GTR Forum for the R32, R33, R34 and R35 "Godzilla"

How are GTR’s already in the 125 mph trap speeds with the massive weight????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #61  
Old 03-14-2009 | 03:32 PM
HennesseyPerformance's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 183
From: Houston, TX
Rep Power: 29
HennesseyPerformance is a splendid one to beholdHennesseyPerformance is a splendid one to beholdHennesseyPerformance is a splendid one to beholdHennesseyPerformance is a splendid one to beholdHennesseyPerformance is a splendid one to beholdHennesseyPerformance is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by vbmw335
Thanks for the information. 7.8 sec is phenomenal time for a 4000 lbs car (driver included). Btw ..what dyno did it do 540whp? was it AWHP ?
measured at the rear wheels on dynojet. we disconected the prop shaft to the front diff.
 
  #62  
Old 03-14-2009 | 03:36 PM
HennesseyPerformance's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 183
From: Houston, TX
Rep Power: 29
HennesseyPerformance is a splendid one to beholdHennesseyPerformance is a splendid one to beholdHennesseyPerformance is a splendid one to beholdHennesseyPerformance is a splendid one to beholdHennesseyPerformance is a splendid one to beholdHennesseyPerformance is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by germeezy1
John, I am alot more curious on how the GTR does on the track. What does Heinricy think of it? What is your opinion on how it stacks up against your CTS-V and ZR-1?

If your looking to drag race, I would think the GTR would be a very expensive way to get into the 10's.
we have not run it on a road course. my overall impression of the GTR is that it will take an average driver and make him faster while he enjoys feeling faster. the car is very forgiving.

heinricy has not driven it yet.

the V is a sedan, so no real comparo there. the zr1 is faster and performs better in almost every category stock vs stock, modded vs modded. however the average driver like me is going to be faster in the GTR. the zr1 requires a higher skill level for it to operate at the top of its performance game.

the ZR1 with mods is really fast from 80-180. we have seen 0-186 mph in 27 seconds. that is over 9 seconds quicker than a stock ZR1.

the GTR is going to have to get closer to 700 rw hp to be able to muscle with some of the big boys over 100 mph.
 
  #63  
Old 03-14-2009 | 03:37 PM
Kickhard's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 187
From: Huntsville AL
Rep Power: 32
Kickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by vbmw335
Kickhard,

I understand what you are saying and agree with most comments ,but why are we seeing relatively low 60-130 numbers from the GTR. Stock GTR's trapping 120 are in mid 10sec ,60-130.

I timed my friends tuned BMW 335i (10 sec , 60-130). His cobb tuned GTR only pulls 2-2.5 cars on the BMW from 60-130. I saw somewhere here that even a CObb tuned GTR does only mid 9 sec 60-130. A cobb tuned GTR is in the high 400 whp range correct? Most cars above 450 whp are faster than that.

But the same cobb cars trap close to 125mph. looking at some of the graphs i posted above ...it falls flat at 100 and then recovers.
http://www.nagtroc.org/forums/index....st=20&start=20
Scroll down in this link for the graphs.
I got ya. I honestly dont understand it either. You would think a 60-130 pull would be quicker than whats being reported. I just know my car feels fast as hell from 0-60,70,80. Maybe a few things to consider.
1. Is the person that is driving the GTR in R mode all the way?
2. Is the car in the right gear for the speed or when doing the 60-130 pull is the car hunting or searching for the right gear?

I havent timed a pull in my car to really see what it does. Maybe when the weather gets better here i will do it. The way I would do it would be all 3 in R mode and then switch it over to manual mode so that I could shift it. Probably 3rd gear starting out at 60mph would be the right gear I dont know. I will get my G-tech out and do some runs to see whats up. I can do it stock and with a Cobb tune stage 1 to see the differences

The AWD isnt really a factor and causing drag because at that speed going straight the bias is pretty much all to the rear.
 
  #64  
Old 03-14-2009 | 03:45 PM
Kickhard's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 187
From: Huntsville AL
Rep Power: 32
Kickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by heavychevy
Some of the cobb cars are still only trapping 118-121 mph. Some trap that stock Seems there is a wide range of power between one car and the next. John, the same guy that ran 10's had his car trapping 114 mph stock, then 118 on Cobb only and then went up from there.

540 whp is enough wheel hp for a 125 mph trap in great conditions. Plus no one says if they've done any weight reduction. Just changing the seats and tires on a GT-R will get you 130-150 lbs
I agree with you there. There does seem to be a gap of 3-4 mph on the traps but there is also the same deal with a gap between dynos to with a car doing 390- 430 stock on the dyno

No one that I know of has done any worthy weight reduction because honestly there really isnt much to reduce. Other than what you said about seats and tires I dont know where else to reduce weight. Problem with tires is going to a non-run flat that there is no tires made out there in the sizes we need them
 
  #65  
Old 03-14-2009 | 03:50 PM
Kickhard's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 187
From: Huntsville AL
Rep Power: 32
Kickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by HennesseyPerformance
measured at the rear wheels on dynojet. we disconected the prop shaft to the front diff.
Hey Hennessey kinda off topic but the guy that transports cars for you delivered my GTR about a month ago. He is a Black guy with a Duelly truck and a covered trailer. Very nice guy he gave me your card and brochure about your place and tuning. He had a Black convertable Viper also going to you he said for tuning.
 
  #66  
Old 03-14-2009 | 05:27 PM
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,934
From: ga
Rep Power: 551
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
There are plenty of ways to reduce weight. The seats are easily a 100+ lbs reduction on their own. Just going to a PS2 or any non run flat is 20lbs. Then a straight cut exhaust could be worth as much as 50-60 lbs. Then the rear seats, battery etc. etc.

To guys that are trying to go faster, that is the first thing you do to utilize the power you already have, but no one seems to ever mention what they took out of the car.

Originally Posted by Kickhard
I agree with you there. There does seem to be a gap of 3-4 mph on the traps but there is also the same deal with a gap between dynos to with a car doing 390- 430 stock on the dyno

No one that I know of has done any worthy weight reduction because honestly there really isnt much to reduce. Other than what you said about seats and tires I dont know where else to reduce weight. Problem with tires is going to a non-run flat that there is no tires made out there in the sizes we need them
 
  #67  
Old 03-14-2009 | 07:08 PM
Kickhard's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 187
From: Huntsville AL
Rep Power: 32
Kickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to beholdKickhard is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by heavychevy
There are plenty of ways to reduce weight. The seats are easily a 100+ lbs reduction on their own. Just going to a PS2 or any non run flat is 20lbs. Then a straight cut exhaust could be worth as much as 50-60 lbs. Then the rear seats, battery etc. etc.

To guys that are trying to go faster, that is the first thing you do to utilize the power you already have, but no one seems to ever mention what they took out of the car.
I know about the PS2's but most that have tried them done like them and the exhaust I only know of 1 maker that makes a straight through design and people dont like them either(I kinda like it though because of the weight and also the straight design should help with power because of no bends too)
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Armytrix_F1_Exhaust
Mercedes / AMG
12
07-08-2019 12:31 AM
Sales@RSW
GT3/GT2
7
09-03-2015 10:34 AM
Zero911
997 Turbo / GT2
4
08-24-2015 07:51 PM
LeoLambo
Lamborghini
2
08-23-2015 07:39 PM
vividracing
Nissan GTR
0
08-19-2015 03:11 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:18 PM.