Nissan GTR Forum for the R32, R33, R34 and R35 "Godzilla"

tt S vs 2012 GT-R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-07-2011 | 03:44 PM
96redLT4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 317
From: california
Rep Power: 28
96redLT4 is infamous around these parts96redLT4 is infamous around these parts
tt S vs 2012 GT-R

I'm not sure anyone here wants to hear this but the reviews on the new Nissan are quite good. The stats earily similar- 530 hp, awd, double clutch tranny making for sub 3 sec 0-60 runs that are repeatable and covered by the warranty. Only big difference is the price- 1/2 as much. For those of us where 170 K isn't small change...
Jim
 
  #2  
Old 03-07-2011 | 03:52 PM
thebland's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 323
From: Detroit
Rep Power: 31
thebland is just really nicethebland is just really nicethebland is just really nicethebland is just really nice
Originally Posted by 96redLT4
I'm not sure anyone here wants to hear this but the reviews on the new Nissan are quite good. The stats earily similar- 530 hp, awd, double clutch tranny making for sub 3 sec 0-60 runs that are repeatable and covered by the warranty. Only big difference is the price- 1/2 as much. For those of us where 170 K isn't small change...
Jim
It's still a Nissan. So, meh... To me, $170K on a Porsche is money better spent than $90K on a Nissan.

I can't speak for owners here, but I bought my S less for the numbers but more for the feel and look of the 911. An impossible childhood dream come true!!
 
  #3  
Old 03-07-2011 | 03:55 PM
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,220
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 497
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
^ Wow. Can't argue that logic (completely dismissing standard features, performance, money, etc...).

The GT-R is proving to be quite a formidable car.
 
  #4  
Old 03-07-2011 | 03:58 PM
2muchtime's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,058
From: Florida
Rep Power: 124
2muchtime has a reputation beyond repute2muchtime has a reputation beyond repute2muchtime has a reputation beyond repute2muchtime has a reputation beyond repute2muchtime has a reputation beyond repute2muchtime has a reputation beyond repute2muchtime has a reputation beyond repute2muchtime has a reputation beyond repute2muchtime has a reputation beyond repute2muchtime has a reputation beyond repute2muchtime has a reputation beyond repute
here we go again.....
 
  #5  
Old 03-07-2011 | 04:05 PM
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,220
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 497
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by 2muchtime
here we go again.....
Same concept, but I don't recall any discussions here between the Turbo S and 2012 GT-R.

I think these two are very closely matched, no?

Both 0-60: ~2.9 secs ... GT-R 2.8secs Turbo S 3.1 (as advertised, actual time, I believe, was either 2.9 or 3.0 for the Turbo S).
Both DCT
Both AWD
Both Top speed 196mph
Both 530HP

I mean, how much more equal can you get?
 
  #6  
Old 03-07-2011 | 04:06 PM
alex55's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,530
From: Romania, Bucharest
Rep Power: 165
alex55 Is a GOD !alex55 Is a GOD !alex55 Is a GOD !alex55 Is a GOD !alex55 Is a GOD !alex55 Is a GOD !alex55 Is a GOD !alex55 Is a GOD !alex55 Is a GOD !alex55 Is a GOD !alex55 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by 2muchtime
here we go again.....
I will get some popcorn, do you want?
 
  #7  
Old 03-07-2011 | 04:07 PM
sbkim's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 814
From: Chicago IL
Rep Power: 0
sbkim has a reputation beyond reputesbkim has a reputation beyond reputesbkim has a reputation beyond reputesbkim has a reputation beyond reputesbkim has a reputation beyond reputesbkim has a reputation beyond reputesbkim has a reputation beyond reputesbkim has a reputation beyond reputesbkim has a reputation beyond reputesbkim has a reputation beyond reputesbkim has a reputation beyond repute
Wasn't regular turbo getting 2.8 with PDK?

Road and Track tested the 2011 911 Turbo S.

0-60 in 2.6 sec
0-100 in 6.3 sec
10.7 @ 128.9 1/4 mile

Results:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/var/ezfl...059e7c3413.pdf

Article:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/ca...he-power-of-12


So there, turbo s wins
 
  #8  
Old 03-07-2011 | 04:10 PM
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,510
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 788
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Moving this to the GT-R to prevent any more hurt feelings in the 997 section.
 
  #9  
Old 03-07-2011 | 04:17 PM
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,220
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 497
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by sbkim
Wasn't regular turbo getting 2.8 with PDK?

Road and Track tested the 2011 911 Turbo S.

0-60 in 2.6 sec
0-100 in 6.3 sec
10.7 @ 128.9 1/4 mile

Results:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/var/ezfl...059e7c3413.pdf

Article:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/ca...he-power-of-12


So there, turbo s wins
Nevermind. I was going off of Porsche's claimed time along with another review. I think the Nissan's best is only 2.88 (or something like that). I didn't see this as a win/lose thing (I don't want to hurt anybody's feelings). For those of you that need it - 2.6 seems quite fast.
 
  #10  
Old 03-07-2011 | 04:20 PM
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,510
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 788
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by jaspergtr
Nevermind. I was going off of Porsche's claimed time along with another review. I think the Nissan's best is only 2.88 (or something like that). I didn't see this as a win/lose thing (I don't want to hurt anybody's feelings). For those of you that need it - 2.6 seems quite fast.
Not your fault. Someone reported it so it was moved.
 
  #11  
Old 03-07-2011 | 11:26 PM
Tachsman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 101
From: Arkansas
Rep Power: 25
Tachsman is a splendid one to beholdTachsman is a splendid one to beholdTachsman is a splendid one to beholdTachsman is a splendid one to beholdTachsman is a splendid one to beholdTachsman is a splendid one to beholdTachsman is a splendid one to behold
As for me, I am really glad Porsche was notably intimidated by the original GT-R which motivated them to improve their 911 TT-S stats. Now we see that drivers of both automobiles have won!
 
  #12  
Old 03-07-2011 | 11:57 PM
96redLT4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 317
From: california
Rep Power: 28
96redLT4 is infamous around these parts96redLT4 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
Not your fault. Someone reported it so it was moved.
Sorry if I posted to the wrong forum. I was wondering if I forgot to hit the submit button. I did not even know ther was a GT-R forum.
Jim
 
  #13  
Old 03-07-2011 | 11:59 PM
96redLT4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 317
From: california
Rep Power: 28
96redLT4 is infamous around these parts96redLT4 is infamous around these parts
Actually I wish this was still in the GT2 997 Turbo forum as it is much better visited, And I was indeed looking to stir up a little controversy, but more specifically get the opinions of people who had driven or ridden in both.
Jim
 
  #14  
Old 03-08-2011 | 12:18 AM
mod mike's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 854
From: calif
Rep Power: 51
mod mike has a spectacular aura aboutmod mike has a spectacular aura aboutmod mike has a spectacular aura about
never one to add to these post but the fact is, a Porsche will always have value. in fact, if a Porsche is in great shape its worth can be 30k plus many decades after. yes that nissan is a fast car, but Porsche is personality type, not just a fast car. in ten years that nissan will be worth 15-20k max. nissan will never have the prestige of any porsche, never.. and 100k is not cheap.... just my 10 cents... but that car is fast!!!
 
  #15  
Old 03-08-2011 | 12:30 AM
crackberry005's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 98
From: southern california
Rep Power: 18
crackberry005 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by alex55
I will get some popcorn, do you want?
pass me some. imma grab me some snickers while im at it.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:42 PM.