AAM Custom Tune '09 GT-R
#16
Today at MIR I ran twice with my GT-R:
Run #1
11.163 @ 125.33mph with a 1.867 60'
Run #2
11.192 @ 125.04mph with a 1.866 60'
Both runs were done WITHOUT launch control or building the revs. I just mashed the throttle off idle.
The track temps were about 10 degrees warmer than when I ran the other night on the private road. The private road also has about a 2.5% decline...whereas MIR is virtually flat (I believe it was 0.2% last time I checked). So I am pretty pleased with the #'s.
Tom
Run #1
11.163 @ 125.33mph with a 1.867 60'
Run #2
11.192 @ 125.04mph with a 1.866 60'
Both runs were done WITHOUT launch control or building the revs. I just mashed the throttle off idle.
The track temps were about 10 degrees warmer than when I ran the other night on the private road. The private road also has about a 2.5% decline...whereas MIR is virtually flat (I believe it was 0.2% last time I checked). So I am pretty pleased with the #'s.
Tom
#17
Today at MIR I ran twice with my GT-R:
Run #1
11.163 @ 125.33mph with a 1.867 60'
Run #2
11.192 @ 125.04mph with a 1.866 60'
Both runs were done WITHOUT launch control or building the revs. I just mashed the throttle off idle.
The track temps were about 10 degrees warmer than when I ran the other night on the private road. The private road also has about a 2.5% decline...whereas MIR is virtually flat (I believe it was 0.2% last time I checked). So I am pretty pleased with the #'s.
Tom
Run #1
11.163 @ 125.33mph with a 1.867 60'
Run #2
11.192 @ 125.04mph with a 1.866 60'
Both runs were done WITHOUT launch control or building the revs. I just mashed the throttle off idle.
The track temps were about 10 degrees warmer than when I ran the other night on the private road. The private road also has about a 2.5% decline...whereas MIR is virtually flat (I believe it was 0.2% last time I checked). So I am pretty pleased with the #'s.
Tom
why no launch control?
#18
It has LC1...and I am a big puss to use it... I think that about covers it...
I know I have some mods on my car....but I really don't want to abuse the clutch and break anything in the rear. I feel that as long as I can prove that I didn't abuse the drivetrain.... I may still have a drivetrain warranty (even if not...I don't want to deal with breaking stuff). I am thinking about getting an LC program that is less aggressive and doesn't abuse the clutch.
Tom
I know I have some mods on my car....but I really don't want to abuse the clutch and break anything in the rear. I feel that as long as I can prove that I didn't abuse the drivetrain.... I may still have a drivetrain warranty (even if not...I don't want to deal with breaking stuff). I am thinking about getting an LC program that is less aggressive and doesn't abuse the clutch.
Tom
Last edited by TMC CL65; 11-12-2011 at 07:09 AM.
#19
It has LC1...and I am a big puss to use it... I think that about covers it...
I know I have some mods on my car....but I really don't want to abuse the clutch and break anything in the rear. I feel that as long as I can prove that I didn't abuse the drivetrain.... I may still have a drivetrain warranty (even if not...I don't want to deal with breaking stuff). I am thinking about getting an LC program that is less aggressive and doesn't abuse the clutch.
Tom
I know I have some mods on my car....but I really don't want to abuse the clutch and break anything in the rear. I feel that as long as I can prove that I didn't abuse the drivetrain.... I may still have a drivetrain warranty (even if not...I don't want to deal with breaking stuff). I am thinking about getting an LC program that is less aggressive and doesn't abuse the clutch.
Tom
LC2 006 3300 -should net you 1.6x-1.7x that should be enough for 10.9x
If you break the tranny , they will check the black box and see you were running 17psi ..warranty will be gone either way.
#20
Just have them install LC2 or get the cobb Lc2 006 3300rpms.. its pretty non -violent and will put you in the 10's easy...
LC2 006 3300 -should net you 1.6x-1.7x that should be enough for 10.9x
If you break the tranny , they will check the black box and see you were running 17psi ..warranty will be gone either way.
LC2 006 3300 -should net you 1.6x-1.7x that should be enough for 10.9x
If you break the tranny , they will check the black box and see you were running 17psi ..warranty will be gone either way.
Tom
#21
Update
I ran my '09 GT-R at an MIR track rental today. I couldn't resist the urge to do further upgrades. So earlier this week I added downpipes, 2.75" intakes, 1000cc injectors and another custom 93 octane tune. The car only put down a peak SAE corrected 524awhp and 580awtq (uncorrected 531awhp and 587awtq). The thing that you don't see with the peak #'s is how much power it picked up throughout the rev range. Here are the results (Without using Launch Control, just nailing the throttle at idle):
Run #1 (with 1 foot roll-out):
0-60 mph: 2.91s
0-100 mph: 6.52s
0-120 mph: 9.15s
0-130 mph: 10.75s
0-150 mph: 14.92s
60-130 mph: 7.84s
1/4m Timeslip: 10.839 @ 128.47 mph (GPS trap was 130.75mph)
Run #2 (with 1 foot roll-out):
0-60 mph: 2.89s
0-100 mph: 6.48s
0-120 mph: 9.13s
0-130 mph: 10.73s
0-150 mph: 15.07s
60-130 mph: 7.83s
1/4m Timeslip: 10.838 @ 128.41 mph (GPS trap was 130.74mph)
Talk about consistent...
I am really very happy with the 14.92s 0-150mph....especially since I didn't use launch control and MIR has virtually no slope (during the 1/4m it drops 1/2 foot and I believe it was 3 feet over the distance it took to go from about 130-150mph).
One other note... I weighed the car on the way back to the pits right after my first run.... with me in the car (my mom says I am not fat...just big-boned ) and just a hair under 1/2 tank, it tipped the scales at 4,085lbs... so the car must be around 3,850lbs.
Tom
Run #1 (with 1 foot roll-out):
0-60 mph: 2.91s
0-100 mph: 6.52s
0-120 mph: 9.15s
0-130 mph: 10.75s
0-150 mph: 14.92s
60-130 mph: 7.84s
1/4m Timeslip: 10.839 @ 128.47 mph (GPS trap was 130.75mph)
Run #2 (with 1 foot roll-out):
0-60 mph: 2.89s
0-100 mph: 6.48s
0-120 mph: 9.13s
0-130 mph: 10.73s
0-150 mph: 15.07s
60-130 mph: 7.83s
1/4m Timeslip: 10.838 @ 128.41 mph (GPS trap was 130.74mph)
Talk about consistent...
I am really very happy with the 14.92s 0-150mph....especially since I didn't use launch control and MIR has virtually no slope (during the 1/4m it drops 1/2 foot and I believe it was 3 feet over the distance it took to go from about 130-150mph).
One other note... I weighed the car on the way back to the pits right after my first run.... with me in the car (my mom says I am not fat...just big-boned ) and just a hair under 1/2 tank, it tipped the scales at 4,085lbs... so the car must be around 3,850lbs.
Tom
#22
I ran my '09 GT-R at an MIR track rental today. I couldn't resist the urge to do further upgrades. So earlier this week I added downpipes, 2.75" intakes, 1000cc injectors and another custom 93 octane tune. The car only put down a peak SAE corrected 524awhp and 580awtq (uncorrected 531awhp and 587awtq). The thing that you don't see with the peak #'s is how much power it picked up throughout the rev range. Here are the results (Without using Launch Control, just nailing the throttle at idle):
Run #1 (with 1 foot roll-out):
0-60 mph: 2.91s
0-100 mph: 6.52s
0-120 mph: 9.15s
0-130 mph: 10.75s
0-150 mph: 14.92s
60-130 mph: 7.84s
1/4m Timeslip: 10.839 @ 128.47 mph (GPS trap was 130.75mph)
Run #2 (with 1 foot roll-out):
0-60 mph: 2.89s
0-100 mph: 6.48s
0-120 mph: 9.13s
0-130 mph: 10.73s
0-150 mph: 15.07s
60-130 mph: 7.83s
1/4m Timeslip: 10.838 @ 128.41 mph (GPS trap was 130.74mph)
Talk about consistent...
I am really very happy with the 14.92s 0-150mph....especially since I didn't use launch control and MIR has virtually no slope (during the 1/4m it drops 1/2 foot and I believe it was 3 feet over the distance it took to go from about 130-150mph).
One other note... I weighed the car on the way back to the pits right after my first run.... with me in the car (my mom says I am not fat...just big-boned ) and just a hair under 1/2 tank, it tipped the scales at 4,085lbs... so the car must be around 3,850lbs.
Tom
Run #1 (with 1 foot roll-out):
0-60 mph: 2.91s
0-100 mph: 6.52s
0-120 mph: 9.15s
0-130 mph: 10.75s
0-150 mph: 14.92s
60-130 mph: 7.84s
1/4m Timeslip: 10.839 @ 128.47 mph (GPS trap was 130.75mph)
Run #2 (with 1 foot roll-out):
0-60 mph: 2.89s
0-100 mph: 6.48s
0-120 mph: 9.13s
0-130 mph: 10.73s
0-150 mph: 15.07s
60-130 mph: 7.83s
1/4m Timeslip: 10.838 @ 128.41 mph (GPS trap was 130.74mph)
Talk about consistent...
I am really very happy with the 14.92s 0-150mph....especially since I didn't use launch control and MIR has virtually no slope (during the 1/4m it drops 1/2 foot and I believe it was 3 feet over the distance it took to go from about 130-150mph).
One other note... I weighed the car on the way back to the pits right after my first run.... with me in the car (my mom says I am not fat...just big-boned ) and just a hair under 1/2 tank, it tipped the scales at 4,085lbs... so the car must be around 3,850lbs.
Tom
Nice times!
what was your 60ft time?
#26
I really don't plan on going with bigger turbos...so I really don't think it is all that beneficial to go with the 3" intake. I am a firm believer in "right-sizing" the mods that are actually on the car. It was very important for me to have a lot of low end torque, especially since I never use launch control. I was concerned that the bigger intake would detract from my low RPM power.
Tom
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eclip5e
Automobiles For Sale
8
04-28-2022 12:38 AM
BlackMarketRacing
996 Turbo / GT2
16
12-03-2015 10:46 AM
PenguiN
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
6
09-15-2015 11:44 AM
Vellano Wheels
Nissan GTR
0
08-19-2015 06:43 PM
vividracing
Nissan GTR
0
08-19-2015 02:11 PM