Panamera The 4-dour coupe by Porsche

Auto Zeitung PTTS vs E63 vs M5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 11-12-2011 | 12:46 AM
kip's Avatar
kip
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,330
From: Northern Europe
Rep Power: 76
kip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by Targa Tim
I'm not sure if I totally agree with you, and I am a big Porsche fan myself.

If AWD is being offered in the M5, and I'm shopping for a sport sedan or SUV right now, then I definitely will take the M5 over PTT. I miss having a 5th seat and bigger trunk in the Panamera sometimes. The second best alternative will be Cayenne turbo.
I agree. At the moment the PTT is the best package for me, but if someone comes with awd and 5seats and similar power with a lot less money, it will probably suit me even better. I am not very marque loyal.

However, the PTTS is a sportscar, the M5 is a sporty saloon. In that way you cant compare them.
 

Last edited by kip; 11-12-2011 at 04:24 AM.
  #17  
Old 11-12-2011 | 07:02 AM
umwolverine's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 447
From: Cincinnati
Rep Power: 34
umwolverine is infamous around these partsumwolverine is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by kip
I know how to subtract numbers, thank you. I am saying you cant pull numbers and compare inbetween pulls like you have, because in this case the turbos are spooled up. The M 5 has a small engine and big turbos, the ptts just the opposite. The M5 has been said to suffer from turbo lag, the PTTS has instant power like a NA engine. If you run the cars in reality 60- or 80- in reality the PTTS will pull ahead until the M5 big turbos spool up and then it is pulling back again. Real world is different than numbers from magazine. So until you have factual numbers, you cant say someone is faster. FACTUALLY in this test the PTTS is faster 0-100, 0-200 km/h and 0-400m, and the M5 is cheaper, all else is assumption. I also really don care if the M5 is faster at speeds 200 and up.
Didn't intend to be critical - just thought the comparison was very interesting. I'm especially surprised that the M5 is this quick - I didn't expect it. I do think there are going to be quite a few very surprised PTTS owners on the autobahn and US highways.
 
  #18  
Old 11-12-2011 | 03:46 PM
kip's Avatar
kip
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,330
From: Northern Europe
Rep Power: 76
kip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to behold
What I think is surprising is that the Panamera Turbo Powerkit gets a better 100-200km/h time (8.2 sec) that equals the times of the M5. On this basis I could also say that I bet the Panamera Turbo Powerkit beats the Turbo S especially at higher speeds, maybe even the M5, but I wont.



Uploaded with ImageShack.us
 
  #19  
Old 11-14-2011 | 01:36 PM
TMC CL65's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 178
From: Maryland
Rep Power: 26
TMC CL65 is a jewel in the roughTMC CL65 is a jewel in the roughTMC CL65 is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by kip
I know how to subtract numbers, thank you. I am saying you cant pull numbers and compare inbetween pulls like you have, because in this case the turbos are spooled up. The M 5 has a small engine and big turbos, the ptts just the opposite. The M5 has been said to suffer from turbo lag, the PTTS has instant power like a NA engine. If you run the cars in reality 60- or 80- in reality the PTTS will pull ahead until the M5 big turbos spool up and then it is pulling back again. Real world is different than numbers from magazine. So until you have factual numbers, you cant say someone is faster. FACTUALLY in this test the PTTS is faster 0-100, 0-200 km/h and 0-400m, and the M5 is cheaper, all else is assumption. I also really don care if the M5 is faster at speeds 200 and up.
Where you are getting your information about the turbo sizes? I have been looking for this information.

Tom
 
  #20  
Old 11-14-2011 | 02:55 PM
kip's Avatar
kip
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,330
From: Northern Europe
Rep Power: 76
kip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by TMC CL65
Where you are getting your information about the turbo sizes? I have been looking for this information.

Tom
From here and there:

M5:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_N63

PTTS:
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...rs-manual.html
 
  #21  
Old 11-14-2011 | 07:20 PM
TMC CL65's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 178
From: Maryland
Rep Power: 26
TMC CL65 is a jewel in the roughTMC CL65 is a jewel in the roughTMC CL65 is a jewel in the rough

I don't see any mention of the turbo size/models...

Tom
 
  #22  
Old 11-14-2011 | 09:13 PM
Mhirsch's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 49
From: Minnesota
Rep Power: 15
Mhirsch is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by dhh
I think there is really no comparison. If we all bought a car for strictly performance we would all own GT-R's.

It seems that everyone here has moved up the 4-door car food-chain BMW---> AMG---> Panamera----> ?

The BMW is invisible and will remain that way - the Panamera is unique and has great performance.

My biggest worry is what is my next car PTT-S or Rapide or some other car. The AMG's and M-cars are no longer even a consideration as it would be a step backwards
BMW invisible, Really? Telling me the PTTS is $70k better than the new M5? I am a porsche owner as well but I disagree with your comment about the new M5 being insignificant as a 4 door performance sedan.
 
  #23  
Old 11-15-2011 | 06:20 AM
kip's Avatar
kip
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,330
From: Northern Europe
Rep Power: 76
kip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by TMC CL65
I don't see any mention of the turbo size/models...

Tom
Sorry didnt understand your question. Peak boost gives some indication in comparing the turbos PTTS 1.2bar? vs 1.5bar in M5.

The M5 has Garrett turbos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8n3w3tDfHU

The PTTS has a new interior for the old turbos I guess, titanium-aluminum turbine wheels:
The increased performance compared with the Panamera Turbo can be attributed to two main enhancements: Improved turbochargers with titanium-aluminium turbine wheels and modified engine control. The use of the innovative titanium-aluminium alloy reduces the weight of the turbine and compressor wheel. This results in a lower moment of inertia and thus in improved and more agile engine responsiveness.
 
  #24  
Old 11-15-2011 | 08:22 AM
TMC CL65's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 178
From: Maryland
Rep Power: 26
TMC CL65 is a jewel in the roughTMC CL65 is a jewel in the roughTMC CL65 is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by kip
Sorry didnt understand your question. Peak boost gives some indication in comparing the turbos PTTS 1.2bar? vs 1.5bar in M5.

The M5 has Garrett turbos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8n3w3tDfHU

The PTTS has a new interior for the old turbos I guess, titanium-aluminum turbine wheels:
The increased performance compared with the Panamera Turbo can be attributed to two main enhancements: Improved turbochargers with titanium-aluminium turbine wheels and modified engine control. The use of the innovative titanium-aluminium alloy reduces the weight of the turbine and compressor wheel. This results in a lower moment of inertia and thus in improved and more agile engine responsiveness.
You can't accurately infer the differences in turbo sizes based on boost #'s. There are so many variables that affect the boost numbers (i.e. intake/exhaust). I don't think you can look at the engine displacement and relative hp numbers. Because based on that logic the X5 M engine would have larger turbos compared to the M5...because the M5 has the same displacement...and only 5 hp more than the X5 M...but the M5 has a lot more boost....one would think that the turbos must be bigger in the X5 M.... which is supposedly the opposite case.

Tom
 
  #25  
Old 11-15-2011 | 12:44 PM
kip's Avatar
kip
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,330
From: Northern Europe
Rep Power: 76
kip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by TMC CL65
You can't accurately infer the differences in turbo sizes based on boost #'s. There are so many variables that affect the boost numbers (i.e. intake/exhaust). I don't think you can look at the engine displacement and relative hp numbers. Because based on that logic the X5 M engine would have larger turbos compared to the M5...because the M5 has the same displacement...and only 5 hp more than the X5 M...but the M5 has a lot more boost....one would think that the turbos must be bigger in the X5 M.... which is supposedly the opposite case.

Tom
I know, thats why I said it gives only some kind of reference to the size, in addition the M5 has reported turbo lag in ALL magazines so far, whereas the PTTS has almost zero lag, I can tell that as I have the Ti-AL turbines. Trust me, they are bigger.
 
  #26  
Old 11-17-2011 | 04:44 AM
kip's Avatar
kip
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,330
From: Northern Europe
Rep Power: 76
kip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to beholdkip is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by TMC CL65
I don't see any mention of the turbo size/models...

Tom
Here is the PTTS turbo:
Mitsubishi TD04-18T-11 with titanium aluminum rotors

http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...ra-turbo-1.pdf

This is what the X6M has, and the M5 F10 should have the same Gerretts:

Turbochargers
Garrett/Honeywell MGT2260DL

http://www.turbomaster.info/eng/appl...nger_cars/bmw/

F10:
"The new S63Tü (technical update) maintains its Garrett-sourced twin-scroll turbochargers that reside in the valley of the V, but the heads that feed them now feature BMW’s Valvetronic variable-valve lift system."
http://www.roadandtrack.com/auto-new...-m5-technology
X6M20102 turbos (izq.)S635504.4/V8GMGT2260DL790484-0003X6M20102 turbos (izq.)S635504.4/V8GMGT2260DL790484-0003
 

Last edited by kip; 11-17-2011 at 05:57 AM.
  #27  
Old 11-17-2011 | 07:29 AM
TMC CL65's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 178
From: Maryland
Rep Power: 26
TMC CL65 is a jewel in the roughTMC CL65 is a jewel in the roughTMC CL65 is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by kip
Here is the PTTS turbo:
Mitsubishi TD04-18T-11 with titanium aluminum rotors

http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...ra-turbo-1.pdf

This is what the X6M has, and the M5 F10 should have the same Gerretts:

Turbochargers
Garrett/Honeywell MGT2260DL

http://www.turbomaster.info/eng/appl...nger_cars/bmw/

F10:
"The new S63Tü (technical update) maintains its Garrett-sourced twin-scroll turbochargers that reside in the valley of the V, but the heads that feed them now feature BMW’s Valvetronic variable-valve lift system."
http://www.roadandtrack.com/auto-new...-m5-technology
X6M20102 turbos (izq.)S635504.4/V8GMGT2260DL790484-0003X6M20102 turbos (izq.)S635504.4/V8GMGT2260DL790484-0003

Thanks! Nice research!

Tom
 
  #28  
Old 11-17-2011 | 08:07 AM
uhn2000's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,310
From: Toronto, Canada
Rep Power: 84
uhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant futureuhn2000 has a brilliant future
Speaking of ///M5 I just came back from the BMW presentation event in Ascari. Amazing car from BMW - for a 4 door sedan that will also be coming in 6MT to NA its a huge hit!

Some Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/uhn2000...7628114890112/

Taxi Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6s-Waj3Pyk

Presentation Video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxF-72pgpWk
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vividracing
Boxster / Cayman
1
10-06-2015 06:13 PM
sdg1871
991 Turbo
16
09-29-2015 09:30 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Auto Zeitung PTTS vs E63 vs M5



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 PM.